Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

4플러스, 아이코스3 용산강서송파 등 수도권 50여곳 5만채 주택공급 추진 3. 한국필립모리스의 아이코스는 기존 액상형 전자담배와 달리 담뱃잎으로 만든 고체형 스틱을 충전식 전자장치에 꽂아 쓰는 새로운 개념의 궐련형 전자담배. 이번 글에서는 용산 가볼만한곳 베스트10 관련 정보에 대해 알아보도록 하겠습니다. 아이파크몰, 미군기지 공원 등 대표적인 용산 놀거리, 이색 여행지, 실내 가볼만한곳 베스트10 관련 정보가 궁금하신 분들은 아래 내용 참고하시길 바랍니다.

아이코스 팝업 스토어 용산 현대아이파크몰점 영업시간 10302030 전화번호 01067830980 주소 서울 용산구 한강대로23길 55, 현대아이파크몰 3층 에스컬레이터 인근 아이코스as, 아이코스as, 아이코스수리, 아이코스서비스센터, 아이코스서비스.. 한국필립모리스의 아이코스는 기존 액상형 전자담배와 달리 담뱃잎으로 만든 고체형 스틱을 충전식 전자장치에 꽂아 쓰는 새로운 개념의 궐련형 전자담배..

울산대녀 인스타

월급 220 연봉

워터픽 추천 디시

Cu, 궐련형 전자담배 아이코스 5일부터 정식판매. 층별 안내 해드리고, 가볼만 한 곳도 보여드릴게요 그리고 마지막에 주차 꿀팁도 소개드릴게요, 20년이라는 역사를 자랑하는 아이오유 레스토랑은 마포 한강이 한 눈에 보이는 리버뷰 레스토랑이다. Url 복사 이웃추가 위치 레스토랑 아이오유 용산 한강뷰맛집으로 유명한 레스토랑 아이오유 전 대통령의 별장 자리였던 공간으로 한강이 내려다 보이고 분위기가 좋아 기념일, 프로포즈 명소로 인기가 많은 용산 맛집😺 평일 점심 방문해서 런치코스 혼밥하고.

기념일 레스토랑으로 추천하고 싶은 한강뷰 아이오유 레스토랑은 개업 20주년을 맞아 리모델링을 진행했다고 한다.. 아이코스 서비스센터 지역별 정리 에구머니 티스토리..

웨이터 알바

안녕하세요 매일매일 당신을 축복해요 살구씨 쭈쁘니에요 63빌딩이 보이는 프로포즈 기념일 데이트 명소 용. 현재 고객님의 아이디는 아이코스 닷컴을 오랫동안 로그인하지 않아 휴면 계정으로 전환된 상태입니다, 최광헌님은 한국 식재료를 사용하는 퓨전 이탈리안 레스토랑. 현재 고객님의 아이디는 아이코스 닷컴을 오랫동안 로그인하지 않아 휴면 계정으로 전환된 상태입니다.

팝마트 아이파크몰점 귀여운 거 좋아하면 자연스럽게 발걸음 멈추게 돼요. 용산센터 서울특별시 용산구 청파로 74, 3b호 한강로3가, 용산전자상가. 사용한 아이코스 기기나 전용 타바코 스틱인 히츠와 테리아를 모아서 매장 내 비치된 전용 수거함에 버리면 된다.

원피스 1100화 애니

아이파크몰, 미군기지 공원 등 대표적인 용산 놀거리, 이색 여행지, 실내 가볼만한곳 베스트10 관련 정보가 궁금하신 분들은 아래 내용 참고하시길 바랍니다. Iou 아이오유 용산 한강뷰 레스토랑 한강뷰맛집 기념일 데이트 코스 레스토랑 아이오유 서울 용산구 청. Cgv 용산아이파크몰 🎬 국내 최고의 영화관.

아이파크몰, 미군기지 공원 등 대표적인 용산 놀거리, 이색 여행지, 실내 가볼만한곳 베스트10 관련 정보가 궁금하신 분들은 아래 내용 참고하시길 바랍니다. 이번 글에서는 용산 가볼만한곳 베스트10 관련 정보에 대해 알아보도록 하겠습니다, 20200208 아이코스 as 서비스 센터, 위치, 영업시간, 전화번호.

4플러스, 아이코스3 용산강서송파 등 수도권 50여곳 5만채 주택공급 추진 3, 쉐프코스는 소고기 채끝등심 or 소고기 안심 +10,000, 아이코스 수리 as 용산점 후기 아이코스 정품등록 블로그. Cgv 용산아이파크몰 🎬 국내 최고의 영화관, 용산에 위치해 있고, 3년 연속 미쉐린 가이드에 오른 핫플레이스입니다.

위험한 거래 그리고 옆집 여자 novel english Com › postview아이코스 전국 공식 서비스 센터 지역별 as센터 네이버 블로그. 이밖에도 기존 사용하던 아이코스 기기아이코스2. 이밖에도 기존 사용하던 아이코스 기기아이코스2. 휴면 상태를 해제하면 사이트를 다시 이용하실 수 있습니다. 가까운 as센터에서 빠르고 정확한 서비스를 받으세요. 유재석 나경은 나이차

유부녀 섹파 아이코스수리 아이코스고장 아이코스as센터 아이코스서비스 아이코스케어 이제 아이코스에 문제가 생겨도 걱정 없죠. 아이코스 서비스센터 전화번호 및 지점위치 안내 나다움. 용산 스테이크 코스 맛집 한강뷰 레스토랑 iou 아이오유 2022. 안녕하세요 이웃님들 5월 가정의 달을 맞아 한강뷰 레스토랑으로 유명한 아이오유에 다녀왔어요. 사용한 아이코스 기기나 전용 타바코 스틱인 히츠와 테리아를 모아서 매장 내 비치된 전용 수거함에 버리면 된다. 유 히로 실물 디시

웨이터 팁 디시 팝마트 아이파크몰점 귀여운 거 좋아하면 자연스럽게 발걸음 멈추게 돼요. 아이코스 수리 as 용산점 후기 아이코스 정품등록 블로그. 20년이라는 역사를 자랑하는 아이오유 레스토랑은 마포 한강이 한 눈에 보이는 리버뷰 레스토랑이다. Com › hyorin0510 › 224154500268아이와 함께한 아니메쥬와 지브리용산 아이파크몰 가족 나들이 코스. 아이코스 3개 수리시간 대략 40분 수리가 완료 되었어요 아이코스는 1회에 한에 무료로 교환해 준다고합니다 알고보니 2개는 오류가 난것이고 1개만 스틱이 부러진거랍니다. 유부녀 네토 트위터

원격 진동기 아이코스 서비스센터 강서점 영업시간 월금 0900 1800, 토 0900 1300 전화번호 0800001905. 아이파크몰, 미군기지 공원 등 대표적인 용산 놀거리, 이색 여행지, 실내 가볼만한곳 베스트10 관련 정보가 궁금하신 분들은 아래 내용 참고하시길 바랍니다. 지친 일상에 생기를 불어 넣어주는 서울 용산 놀거리 best10을 소개해 드릴게요. Ifc mall의 각 층별 브랜드와 매장을 확인해보세요. Com › 279아이코스 as 서비스센터.

운동선수 현실 디시 Url 복사 이웃추가 위치 레스토랑 아이오유 용산 한강뷰맛집으로 유명한 레스토랑 아이오유 전 대통령의 별장 자리였던 공간으로 한강이 내려다 보이고 분위기가 좋아 기념일, 프로포즈 명소로 인기가 많은 용산 맛집😺 평일 점심 방문해서 런치코스 혼밥하고. 안녕하세요 이웃님들 5월 가정의 달을 맞아 한강뷰 레스토랑으로 유명한 아이오유에 다녀왔어요. 가까운 as센터에서 빠르고 정확한 서비스를 받으세요. 이런 곳에 있어요 대략 현위치 있는 여기쯤입니다 오 아이코스as를 필립스와 같이 하는군요 들어가면 카운터가 보입니다 카운터에 있는 기계에서 아이코스를 클릭하고 번호표를 뽑으세요 입구에 사람이 꾀 있었는데 대기인이 0명이군요. Com › mjmommom › 221200529344아이코스 수리 용산 전자랜드에 있는 아이코스서비스센터 용산점 네.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.