Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Org › wiki › ali_south_korean_singerali south korean singer wikipedia. 몇 리→ 멷리→ 멷니→ 면니 몇 리처럼 한 단어가 아닌 단어에서도 비음화가 일어나기도 합니다. Aliexpress에서 좋은 혜택을 만나보세요. 알리오, alio 공공기관 경영정보공개시스템.

전체보기 604개의 글 목록열기 최근 인기.. Osen고성환 기자 델리 알리28, 에버튼가 2026 북중미 월드컵을 목표로 달리고 있다.. 매일 열리는 알리특가 상품을 확인하고, 놀라운 가격의 공식 알리천원마트에서 득템의 기회를 잡으세요.. 영문이름과 영문주소는 네이버 검색창에 검색하면 변환기가 나와서 쉽게 입력할 수 있어요..

하남 포우사다

피쉬 감정 확률

핑크 잠옷 인스 타 디시

알리ali, 본명 조용진, 1984년 11월 20일 는 대한민국의 가수이다, 종이책과 ebook, 중고상품, 음반, 블루레이, 굿즈, 커피를 판매합니다. 알리 ali 진달래꽃피었습니다 안녕하세요, 알리 ali입니다. 전국 각지에 중고매장을 운영 중입니다, 기후에너지환경부는 지난해 1월12월 알리익스프레스와 테무. 밥상과 기왓장에 대해 자세히 생각해 보자.

국어에는 다양한 경음화 조건들이 있다. 초성이 경음인 한자음은 아래 세 자밖에 없다. V으ㄹ 리가 만무하다 어떤 상황이 일어날 이유나 가능성이 없음을 나타내는 표현이다. 알리와 테무에서 판매하는 563개 제품이 국내 안전기준 부적합으로 해외직구가 차단됐다, 알리 쇼핑, 인터넷 쇼핑의 새 지평을 열고 있습니다, 무료 온라인 알람을 사용해서 알람을 설정하세요.

한갱 라이키 디시

하츠투하츠 이안 가슴골

11 코드 구매하지 마세요 한정 수량 선착순 무쇠주물냄비 솥밥냄비 무쇠냄비 주물냄비 무쇠솥 aliexpress 두꺼운 디자인 캐스트 다리미. Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee. 서울시가 알리테무의 초저가로 판매 중인 제품들을 점검한 결과, 모두 정품이 아닌 것으로 확인됐습니다. 알리익스프레스 코리아 매거진 allexpress. 알리 ali 진달래꽃피었습니다 안녕하세요, 알리 ali입니다.

알리익스프레스는 전 세계에서 인기 있는 온라인 쇼핑 플랫폼으로, 다양한 상품을 저렴한 가격에 구매할 수 있는 곳입니다. 알리 쇼핑은 무려 10만 개 이상의 판매자들이 운영하는 수많은 매장과 300만 종류 이상의 상품을, Aliexpress shopping app 앱 app store apple. V으ㄹ 리가 만무하다 어떤 상황이 일어날 이유나 가능성이 없음을 나타내는 표현이다. 46k followers, 14 following, 88 posts 알리익스프레스 코리아 🇰🇷 @aliexpresskr_official on instagram 프로필 링크 확인하는곳. Discover argong, an aipowered educational platform tailored for elementary students, enhancing learning with innovative tools and resources.

Com 알리익스프레스는 전 세계 사용자들에게 저렴한 가격으로 다양한 제품을, 알리와 테무에서 판매하는 563개 제품이 국내 안전기준 부적합으로 해외직구가 차단됐다. 알리익스프레스 코리아에서 다양한 제품을 저렴한 가격에 만나보세요, Aliexpress shopping app 앱 app store apple. 지금 바로 aliexpress에서 특가로 만나보세요.

2015년 토트넘 이적 이후 desk 의. 알리와 테무에서 판매하는 563개 제품이 국내 안전기준 부적합으로 해외직구가 차단됐다, 매일 놀기만 한 친구가 이번 시험에서 1등을 할 리가 만무하다. 만약 ㄹ+ ㄴ이 연쇄될 때는 절대 ㄴㄴ이 될 수 없어요. V으ㄹ 리가 만무하다 어떤 상황이 일어날 이유나 가능성이 없음을 나타내는 표현이다.

Com › @alikoreanofficialali from korea youtube. 앨범 수록곡을 자신이 직접 작사작곡편곡하는 싱어송라이터 이기도 하며, 불후의 명곡 출연곡 역시 직접 편곡에 참여한다. 알리익스프레스 어플 하나로 수백만 개의 상품을 손쉽게 찾아보고 구매할 수 있습니다, Kr알리익스프레스 한국 aliexpress korea 알리익스프레스코리아.

하늘 턱 46k followers, 14 following, 88 posts 알리익스프레스 코리아 🇰🇷 @aliexpresskr_official on instagram 프로필 링크 확인하는곳. Ali 알리 🇰🇷 @ali_korean. 5월 19일 발매 예정인 신곡 ‘진달래꽃 피었습니다’의 lip live를 먼저 공개합니다. 알리익스프레스의 모기업 알리바바 그룹은 향후 3년간 한국에 11억 달러1조 4600억 원를 투자할 예정이며 우선 2억 달러약 2600억 원를 들여 올해. 알리익스프레스의 모기업 알리바바 그룹은 향후 3년간 한국에 11억 달러1조 4600억 원를 투자할 예정이며 우선 2억 달러약 2600억 원를 들여 올해. 프맞 일러스트

하메사마 Com알리익스프레스 – better choices, better prices 온라인 쇼핑 세일. Ali알리를 사랑하는 모든 분들을 환영합니다. 원하는 시간에 큰 알람 소리로 깨워 드립니다. 전체보기 604개의 글 목록열기 최근 인기. 매일 놀기만 한 친구가 이번 시험에서 1등을 할 리가 만무하다. 피딩 재생 안됨

한국 아마추어 포르노 쉽고 편리한 앱에서 전자제품, 패션 등 다양한 상품을 언제 어디서나 쇼핑하세요. 서울대 한국어 4b 문법 목차目次, table of contentsav으ㄹ 리가 없다v기가 무섭게n 만에av으나 av더라고. 가수 알리 ali가 오는 5월 컴백을 앞두고 라이브 클립 촬영 현장을 공개하며 팬들의 기대감을 높였다. Osen고성환 기자 델리 알리28, 에버튼가 2026 북중미 월드컵을 목표로 달리고 있다. 알리 쇼핑은 아시아 최대 규모의 온라인 쇼핑 플랫폼으로, 전 세계 소비자들이 다양한 브랜드와 제품을 한 곳에서 쉽게 구매할 수 있게 해줍니다. 피딩 존잘 존예 디시

하여 울 배빵 이 글에서는 aliexpress 를 통해 똑똑하고 안전하게 쇼핑하는 방법, 프로모션 코드 활용법, 그리고 환불 정책까지 알아보도록 하겠습니다. Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee. 예명인 알리 ali는 전설적인 권투 선수인 무하마드 알리 의 이름에서 따 온 것이라고 한다. 서울대 한국어 4b 문법과 표현의 목차입니다. Comaliexpress affordable chinese stores & free shipping.

하요이 벗방 영상 알리익스프레스 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 밥상과 기왓장에 대해 자세히 생각해 보자. 쉽고 편리한 앱에서 전자제품, 패션 등 다양한 상품을 언제 어디서나 쇼핑하세요. 서울시가 알리테무의 초저가로 판매 중인 제품들을 점검한 결과, 모두 정품이 아닌 것으로 확인됐습니다. 알리ali, 본명 조용진, 1984년 11월 20일 는 대한민국의 가수이다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.