軍 2인자 장유샤 등 2명 기율위반 조사종합.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

시진핑 주석을 제외하고 중국군 서열 1위인 장유샤 중앙군사위 부주석 숙청 이유는 미국에 핵무기 기밀을 넘겼기 때문이라고 월스트리트저널wsj이. 3 2023년 10월 25일에 공식적으로 해임된 국방부. 대규모 숙청의 목적은 무엇인가 지구본 뉴스룸. 시진핑 중국 국가주석의 ‘30년 지기’였던 그가 한순간에 몰락한 이유에.

시진핑, 장유사 숙청으로 군부 장악에 성공한듯 블로그.. Days ago 자극하여 내부에서부터 체전에 무너뜨리라는 전략을 무사하고 있다는 분석에 힘을 실어줍 pages 󱙿 public figure 󱙿 digital creator 󱙿 동물 데일리드링크 군사 󱙿 videos 󱙿 중국, 공산당 2인자 숙청 베이징 현재 폭풍전야 시진핑의 과감한 결단 대체.. Com › nobo2003 › 224161073829사실상 친위 쿠데타..

중국 장유사 숙청ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 마도샀나 S.

중국군 장유사 숙청 시진핑 중앙군사위원회 군부 권력투쟁 푸젠방 산시방.

중국군 서열 2위 장유사 숙청를 처음 접하시는 분들께 도움이 되었길 바래요.. 장 부주석의 체포로 시 주석의 군부 숙청 작업은 마무리 단계에 들어간 것으로 보인다.. 12k views streamed 3 days ago.. 지난 25일 열린 중국공산당 정치국집단학습에 장유샤 가운데 중앙군사위 부주석이 시 주석의 발언을 적고 있다..

26 0935 중국 장유사 숙청 이유 미국에 핵무기 관련 정보 넘겼다 주장.

시진핑 주석을 제외하고 중국군 서열 1위인 장유샤 중앙군사위 부주석 숙청 이유는 미국에 핵무기 기밀을 넘겼기 때문이라고 월스트리트저널wsj이. 시진핑의 칼이라 불리는 그의 출생부터 로켓 군 경력, 그리고 절대적 신뢰의 배경까지 알아보도록 하겠습니다. 중국군 서열 2위 장유사 숙청를 처음 접하시는 분들께 도움이 되었길 바래요, This divergence became increasingly visible across the pla and ultimately posed a serious challenge to xi’s authority. 시진핑, 장유사 숙청으로 군부 장악에 성공한듯 블로그. 중국 인민해방군의 2인자 장유샤 당 중앙군사위원회 부주석과 류전리 중앙군사위원이 전격 숙청됨으로써 서방과의 중국군 소통 창구가 상실됐다는 우려.

Com › frezzz06 › 224161887115중국 군부 권력투쟁과 장유사 숙청, 대만 침공 리스크 점검, Days ago 베이징연합뉴스 김현정 특파원 중국 군부 최고위 인사인 장유샤 당 중앙군사위원회 부주석이 전격 낙마한 가운데, 29일 중국 국방부 정례, 2위 entj 연애하면서 감정 소모하는 걸.

myfans ies744 시진핑의 칼이라 불리는 그의 출생부터 로켓 군 경력, 그리고 절대적 신뢰의 배경까지 알아보도록 하겠습니다. 12k views streamed 3 days ago. 중국 정가는 이처럼 한동안 공포의 균형 속에서 군은 군대로, 당은 당대로 반부패의 기치를 내건 숙청 바람이 매섭게 불 전망이다. 24일 아사히에 논평을 기고한 르포라이터 야스다 미네토시는 지난해 부패 등의 혐의로 숙청당한 중국 관료가 98. Kr › article › 25384101시진핑장유샤 ‘공포의 균형’&mldr. myfans lpsg

miss.av 시진핑 주석을 제외하고 중국군 서열 1위인 장유샤 중앙군사위 부주석 숙청 이유는 미국에 핵무기 기밀을 넘겼기 때문이라고 월스트리트저널wsj이. Kr › view › akr20260129185100083장유샤 숙청 배경 침묵하는 中&mldr. 10월 20일, 중국의 4중전회가 특이한 이유 네이버블로그 10월 20일, 중국의 4중전회가 특이한 이유fea. 대규모 숙청의 목적은 무엇인가 지구본 뉴스룸. 지난 20일에는 장관급 당정군 고위 간부가 참석하는 세미나에 스타이펑 당 중앙조직부장과 함께 장 부주석이 불참해 낙마설이 돌기도 했다. missav てまん

minami airi pikpak 2위 entj 연애하면서 감정 소모하는 걸. 장에 대한 시 주석의 분노가 읽히는 듯하다. 1위 시진핑과 2위 장유사가 건재하고, 35위가 사라졌으니, 하나 남은 부주석 자리를 6위 장성민이 가져갔다고 볼수도있음. 중국 공산당 제20기 전국인민대표대회 2022 이후 시진핑 주석의 장기집권 체제는 역사적 전환점에 직면하고 있습니다. ‘中 2인자’ 장유샤 숙청 미스터리’ 기사 중 ‘장유사’는 ‘장유샤’의 잘못이므로 바로잡습니다. missed_me_0 sex

missav fan 1위 시진핑, 2위 장유사, 3위 허웨이둥, 4위 리상푸, 5위 먀오화, 6위 장성민, 7위 류전리 였는데, 3위,4위,5위가 모두 숙청됨. 세계의 국가와 도시들 중국, 시진핑 장기집권의 걸림돌인 군서열 2위 장유사 부주석 숙청 해븐하선 ・ 11시간 전 url 복사 이웃추가 2026년 1월 27일 화요일. Kr › view › akr20260129185100083장유샤 숙청 배경 침묵하는 中&mldr. 미 월스트리트 저널은 중국군 비공개 브리핑을 인용해 장. 軍 2인자 장유샤 등 2명 기율위반 조사종합.

miru myfan 장유사 시진핑 숙청 중국공산당 대만침공 pla. 지난 25일 시진핑 중국 국가주석이 주최한 공산당 정치국 집단학습입니다. 중국 공산당 제20기 전국인민대표대회 2022 이후 시진핑 주석의 장기집권 체제는 역사적 전환점에 직면하고 있습니다. Com › shayne_12 › 224158541417중국 서열 2위 장유사 숙청, 견고한 시진핑 신제국주의 시대와 대만. Com › shayne_12 › 224158541417중국 서열 2위 장유사 숙청, 견고한 시진핑 신제국주의 시대와 대만.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.