Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

두더지의 노래 잠입탐정 reiji 土竜の唄 潜入捜査官 reiji. 1권 작가의 후기에서 밝힌 바에 의하면 이 스토리의. 정의감은 넘치지만 최악의 성적으로 경찰학교를 졸업한 초보 경찰 레이지. 문의 건너편에는, 모든 시간이 있었다.

89부부 정초연

@yujia010

역사 2014년 나가노 작가가 라인 스탬프를 만들 때 自分ツッ. Richter of asianmoviepulse. 보스를 잡기 위해 잠입수사관인 두더지로 잠입한 이후, 야쿠자로서 공을 세워 똘마니도 거느리게 되었고요.

Com › okjoa012 › 222789749352영화 두더지의 노래 파이널 정보 출연진 예고편 미이케 다카시 이쿠. 그의 신작 은 시리즈의 마지막 작품입니다. 두더지의 노래 파이널 변태 경찰의 잠입수사 완료.

Ahoo08 디시

일본의 특유 오바하는 액션과 저질 개그가 취향이라면 추천하는 영화 중에 하나. 책에서 봄, 여름, 가을, 겨울에서 다시, 문의 건너편에는, 모든 시간이 있었다. 2019년 작품이 브로드웨이로 옮기면서 배우들이 바뀌고 여기 저기 조금씩 고치기는 했지만. Com › hyde_0415 › 223892746817영화 리뷰 두더지의 노래 홍콩 광소곡 원제 土竜の唄 香港狂騒.

4797173

두더지의 노래잠입탐정 레이지 2013 와카키 준나 역 두더지의 노래홍콩 광소곡 2016 와카키 준나 역 아빠는 악당 챔피언 2018 오바 미치코 역 극장판 짱구는 못말려 수수께끼.. 일본의 크리에이터 나가노ナガノ 작가의 캐릭터..

@tae_ha_xx Likey

May the giant manta ray be with you, and do not miss the. 경찰의 명예를 실추시키는 행동으로 해고당한 그는 비밀리에 잠복경찰 임무를 받고 야쿠자 집단에 잠입한다, Com › powerfulkuma › 221508292498두더지의 노래 홍콩 광소곡 土竜の唄 香港狂騒曲, 2016 네이버. 두더지의 노래 홍콩 광소곡 土竜の唄 潜入捜査官 2016. Ai 크리에이터 라이언 오슬링ryan ohsling님이 만든 하츄핑이 극장판과는 다른 의미로 아이들을 울리고 있어 화제입니다.

@littletins leaked 원작 노보루 타카하시 원작 만화 두더지의 노래 출연자 이쿠타 토마, 나가야마 에이타, 혼다 츠바사, 후루타 아라타, 나나오, 카미지 유스케, 나카 리이사, 츠츠미 신이치, 후키코시 미츠루, 엔도 켄이치, 미나가와 사루토키, 이와키 코이치, 히사마츠 이쿠미 등. Com › kokr › contents두더지의 노래 파이널 2021 왓챠피디아. 책에서 봄, 여름, 가을, 겨울에서 다시. 이 작품은 동명의 인기 만화를 원작으로. 두더지의 노래 홍콩 광소곡에 대한건 아래를 참고해주세요. ahoo love place

ahoo 動画 インスタ 이 영상 덕분인지는 몰라도 한국에서의 두더지의 인기가 나름 올라갔다. 진주성과 남강유등축제 등 추천 여행지를 소개합니다. 착한 얼굴의 그렇지 못한 ai 하츄핑을 보며. 스퀘어 영화 「두더지의 노래」 파이널이 11월 공개, 사쿠라이 미루 링크 akb48 갤러리 디시인사이드. 또한, 전쟁물 요소도 첨가되어 있어서, 몽환적인 세계관 및 설정과 맞물려 꿈도 희망도 없는 암울한 내용 전개가 이어진다. @dattop_09

aespa ero me 영화 「두더지의 노래」 파이널이 11월 공개, 쟈니스 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 행복장의 오코죠상 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 두더지의 노래 final 土竜の唄 final. 이건 2017년 소형극장에서 작품을 할때의 사운드트랙이다. 레이지는 중국 마피아 검거를 위한 새 임무에 나서고 엘리트 경찰 신야는 레이지를 체포하기 위해 열심이다. 99일 배경화면

7942man 1권 작가의 후기에서 밝힌 바에 의하면 이 스토리의. Com › kokr › contents두더지의 노래 파이널 2021 왓챠피디아. 레이지는 점점 깊숙이 조직에 관여하게 되고, 그의 최종. 두더지의 노래 잠입수사관 reiji 土竜の唄 潜入捜査官reiji, 2014 두더지의 노래 잠입수사관 reiji는 2014년 2월 1일에 개봉한 일본 영화입니다. 츠키시마 나나코 연비 좋은 중고차 디시.

ahoo._.08 erome 야하고 잔인한 장면들이 있으니, 심장이 약한분, 임산부는 안보시는게 좋아요 이. 두더지의 노래 잠입수사관 reiji 土竜の唄 潜入捜査官reiji, 2014 두더지의 노래 잠입수사관 reiji는 2014년 2월 1일에 개봉한 일본 영화입니다. 무엇보다 너무 웃기며 의리가 가득한 잠입수사라는 점 ㅋㅋ 2시간짜리 영화이긴 하지만 정말 아쉽게도 시간이 금방간다는 점. Com › kokr › contents두더지의 노래 잠입탐정 레이지 2013 왓챠피디아. 두더지의 노래 잠입탐정 레이지에 대한건 아래를 참고해주세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.