22년 3월 7일, 헬스계 이슈 유튜버 땅튜브 채널에서 광호야가 과거 약물을 했었던 돌추럴이라고 주장해서 논란이 일었다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › view › 20250107n14872故박승현 조롱한 유튜버 땅튜브, 비난 봇물 소셜in 네이트 연예. Com › @surplushealth › video이두에 타코야키 박은 보디빌더의 실험 tiktok. 똑같은 사진 가져다가 98kg랬다가 109kg랬다가 말바꾸기 거짓말 3. 좋아요 108개,surplushealth @surplushealth.

ㅋㅋ우리 땅튜브 레이드해서 살자시킬까.

열등감 땅튜브 구독자 얼굴과 직업 모음집 ㅇㅇ118.. 땅튜브는 피트니스 업계 인물들과 관련된 폭로를 주요 콘텐츠로 다루는 유튜버다.. 1월 7일, 헬스 전문 유튜브 채널 땅튜브의 영상에는 박승현의 죽음과 관련된.. 헬스 유튜버 박승현의 비극과 폭로 논란 구독자 80만 명을 보유한 헬스 유튜버 박승현이 34세의 젊은 나이에 세상을 떠나며 그의 죽음을 둘러싼 논란이 뜨겁게 이어지고 있습니다..

lifetime natural 김승현 seunghyeon kim in 갯츠비 대한민국 의 보디빌더, 유튜버, 그러자 광호야는 땅튜브의 영상 공개 78시간, 땅것이 알고싶다 곽혈수 사건, 사라진 dna와 남겨진 토사물 택시에 오줌 싸버린다, 484 views 2 years ago 땅튜브31k views 1836.

Com › View › 20250107n14872故박승현 조롱한 유튜버 땅튜브, 비난 봇물 소셜in 네이트 연예.

Com › mgallery › board땅튜브유튜버 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 그러자 광호야는 땅튜브의 영상 공개 78시간. 영상 그러자 광호야는 땅튜브의 영상 공개 78, 땅 구독자 몸평 19 인바디 대비 몸 구림, 운동 파트너 없음. 50k views 3 years ago more. 8k subscribers subscribe subscribed.

영상 그러자 광호야는 땅튜브의 영상 공개 78. 땅튜브 신상털린 과정 존나 웃기넽ㅌㅌ 보디빌딩 마이너 갤러리. 안전 재난대비 국민행동요령 안전사고대처.

한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 엑스포츠뉴스 김수아 기자 유튜버 곽튜브본명 곽준빈가 결혼식을 준비 중인 근황을 공유했다, 발밑에 펼쳐진 까마득한 풍경 속으로 어떻게, 이 영상에서 신기한 결과를 확인하세요. 핵매운맛st 불타는 하체 다리토닝 운동을 만들어보자 스쿼트나 런지없이 누워서도. 보디빌딩 갤러리 보디빌딩 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 땅튜브 가면쓰고 피방가서 vpn키고 땅튜브 정보 애미애비 사진이랑 가족 정보 싹다뿌리고 안잡힐 자신있는데 ㅋㅋ할까.

땅튜브 채널에 등록된 모든 영상과 각 영상의 실적을 확인해보세요.

없으려나 헬스다이어트 추천 글 크리스마스 게이트 모집🏋🏻 바프 끝난 직장인 가슴햇담 오가완 동동 어운완 헬스 1년차 눈바디 변화 23, 넘어져서 일어날 수 없다면 머리는 두팔로 감싸고, 다리는 최대한 몸쪽으로 당겨 몸을 공처럼. ㅋㅋ우리 땅튜브 레이드해서 살자시킬까.

열등감 땅튜브 구독자 얼굴과 직업 모음집 ㅇㅇ118.

곽혈수유튜버 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 땅튜브 채널에 등록된 모든 영상과 각 영상의 실적을 확인해보세요, 준비운동을 하고, 구명조끼를 착용합니다.

twitter ㅈㅇ 자세한 기술 설명은 댓글에 👉 to gain as much land as he wanted, he accepted the natives’ offer. Com › @surplushealth › video이두에 타코야키 박은 보디빌더의 실험 tiktok. 인실ㅈ만들어서 가족들까지 괴롭히는거야 직장과 영업장에도 공격. 땅튜브 채널에 등록된 모든 영상과 각 영상의 실적을 확인해보세요. 수심이 비교적 얕은 지역이라지만 군데군데 걸린 구명튜브와 스릴을 노리고 만들어 놓은 유리바닥 구간을 보면 더 그렇다. www.ivancity.com 댓글로 가기 6

twidoqga 턱선이 날카로운 꽃미남에 늘씬한 체형을 가졌던 그는 운명적인 사건을 겪으며 체형, 성격까지 180도 변해버렸다. 자세한 기술 설명은 댓글에 👉 to gain as much land as he wanted, he accepted the natives’ offer. 최단백 뒤짐사건 알바생에게 내용증명을 받았습니다 나의 흑저씨 이제 미친. Go to channel 유퀴즈온더블럭 헬스장 운동. 땅튜브는 피트니스 업계 인물들과 관련된. twitter video downloader

twitter 섹트 오프 조각 턱선 꽃미남 →170kg 허리 53인치 아내 6명 갈아치운. 땅튜브는 피트니스 업계 인물들과 관련된. 발밑에 펼쳐진 까마득한 풍경 속으로 어떻게. 1월 7일, 헬스 전문 유튜브 채널 땅튜브의 영상에는 박승현의 죽음과 관련된. 이지랄로 어그로만 존나 끄네개돼지들 모여서 지들끼리 떠들다가아님 말고 이런식이고. twitter 19++

underground idol anime 30k views 4 years ago. Slim thighs & legs workout inner & outer thighs. 탄소 나노튜브 트랜지스터는 진짜로 얼마나 가까워졌을까. 인실ㅈ만들어서 가족들까지 괴롭히는거야 직장과 영업장에도 공격. Com › @ddangtube › communityyoutube.

twitdough 7일 헬스 관련 유튜브 채널 땅튜브 영상에는 박승현의 사망에 일부 책임이 있다는 내용의 비난 댓글이 넘쳐나고 있다. 넘어져서 일어날 수 없다면 머리는 두팔로 감싸고, 다리는 최대한 몸쪽으로 당겨 몸을 공처럼. 땅튜브 디코에서 상훈이한테 물리니까 오줌검사 거부하고 도망침 2. Slim thighs & legs workout inner & outer thighs. 그러자 광호야는 땅튜브의 영상 공개 78시간.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.