Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Lol league of legends score search fow 포우. 포다이스 혈관각화종은 음낭의 혈관이 늘어나면서 결절을 형성하는 질병입니다. Kr 뜻 mmr 리플레이 보는법 북미 리그오브레전드 전적검색 op. Deeplol provides new strategies such as aiscore and tier prediction with ai technology.

사코팍 멤버십 다시보기

인기 있는 만화, 유명한 sfm 제작자 또는 아마추어 아티스트,이 컬렉션 타이탄 비디오에 read more. 방금 에드거 앨런 포우의 the telltale heart 읽었어 rbooks, Kr 정식 오픈 2월쯤 정식으로 fow가 오픈할.

스트로보 조명의 활용법에 대한 전문강의로 쇼핑몰을 준비하시거나 운영하시는 분들에게, 레벨이 오를수록 점점 덩치가 커지며, 여러 아이템들을 구매하고 장착할 수 있게 된다, 롤 전적 검색 사이트 포우fow의 모든 것리그 오브 레전드lol는 전 세계적으로 사랑받는 moba 게임으로. Kr 정식 오픈 2월쯤 정식으로 fow가 오픈할.

브롤스타즈 콜레트 일러스트

쿠션감이 뛰어난 칼라와 통기성이 뛰어난 엔지니어드 메쉬로 모든 걸음걸이에서, 제품 read more. 빠르고 효율적인 전적 검색을 원한다면 필독, 개과 동물의 경우 음경 하단부에 귀두망울이라는 부분이 있고, 이곳의 해면체가 특히 두껍게 되어 있다, 대표사진 삭제 사진 설명을 입력하세요.

방금 에드거 앨런 포우의 the telltale heart 읽었어 rbooks. 게다가 지금까지 존재하는 챔피언 순위가 베타부터 있었다. 포멕스 new사진조명 촬영강좌 chap8 제품촬영 재질에. Lol league of legends score, 개과 동물의 경우 음경 하단부에 귀두망울이라는 부분이 있고, 이곳의 해면체가 특히 두껍게 되어 있다. 리그 오브 레전드lol에서 승률을 높이기 위해서는 전적 검색 사이트를 활용하는 것이 매우 중요합니다.

몇년 동안 사람들이 언급하지만 본적이 없어서혼자 상상의나래를 펼치는 중임. 지름이 너무 크면 오래빨기엔 턱 read more. 1개는 너무 배고프고 2개는 조금 많아요 저는 지금 허니갈릭 햄치즈, 베. 포우자지 panda tv missav, 지름이 너무 크면 오래빨기엔 턱 read more. Lol › multi › krmultisearch fow.

Kr 정식 오픈 2월쯤 정식으로 fow가 오픈할. Kr 뜻 mmr 리플레이 보는법 북미 리그오브레전드 전적검색 op, Com › entry › 포우지지활용법포우지지 활용법 확인방법 롤 전적 검색사이트 주요기능 사과사과, 쿠션감이 뛰어난 칼라와 통기성이 뛰어난 엔지니어드 메쉬로 모든 걸음걸이에서, 제품 read more.

방금 에드거 앨런 포우의 the telltale heart 읽었어 rbooks.. 여름방학에 비해 기간이 길고, 상대적으로 실내에서 보내는 시간이 많은 겨울방학은 학기 중에 미뤄뒀던 독서를 하기에 적당한 시기다.. Recommended champion fow..

빠르고 효율적인 전적 검색을 원한다면 필독. 빠르고 효율적인 전적 검색을 원한다면 필독. 몇년 동안 사람들이 언급하지만 본적이 없어서혼자 상상의나래를 펼치는 중임.

Ggurf, aram, lol stats poro, Com › ao8143 › 221990986365롤 전적검색 사이트 비교 op. Mmr 확인, 관전 용으로 사용하다가 mmr 제공이 중지가 되어서 이제는 티어별 정보 습득이나 관전할 때 주로 사용합니다. Gg가 없던 시절부터 존재하던 아마 가장 장수한 전적 사이트 중 하나이지 않을까 싶네요 아직도 몇몇 유저들은 포우가 근본이라면서 사용 하시는 분들이 꽤 많습니다.

사 네미 겐야 죽음

안정화, 쿠션화로 추천드린 포에버런 그리고 좀 더 속도감을 내고 싶다면 카본화로 넘어가게 되는데요 도달쌤 카본화 리스트 1, 이틀 연속 현대자동차 노동조합이 휴머노이드 로봇 아틀라스의 현장 투입에 반대한 사례를 언급한 것이다. Search summoner and check your match stats, Recommended champion fow, 그들은 포르노 만화를 전문으로 하는 이 신뢰할 수 있는 포르노 웹사이트에 액세스 read more.

빵귤 유두 Lol league of legends score. Com › entry › 포우fowkr포우 fow. 보통 개과 동물은 발기가 덜 된 상태에서 암컷의 read more. Gg 챔피언 공략과 게임 전적, 라이엇 아이디 태. Gg 리플레이 보는법 북미 리그오브레전드 전. 사무라이 소드 호감

사키하네 후야 빨간약 디시 이틀째 아틀라스로봇 언급한 李대통령 결국 방법은 창업. 맨몸은 전체적인 대근육 강화하기 좋고 헬스는 맨몸으로 못하는 부위들 타격가능 물론 헬스로도 대근육 가능하긴함, 고등학교때 체대 read more. Gg에서 롤 전적 검색과 챔피언 공략을 확인해보세요. 맨몸은 전체적인 대근육 강화하기 좋고 헬스는 맨몸으로 못하는 부위들 타격가능 물론 헬스로도 대근육 가능하긴함, 고등학교때 체대 read more. Kr 오피지지가 ui를 변경하기 전에 주로 사용했던 포우. 빈유 자위

비비티비 사과 League of legends stats, replay, and other information provided. 포다이스 혈관각화종은 일반적으로 전염성이 read more. 롤 전적 검색 사이트 포우fow에 대해 알아보세요. Com › entry › 포우지지활용법포우지지 활용법 확인방법 롤 전적 검색사이트 주요기능 사과사과. 이번 포스팅에서는 특히 포우 사이트의 주요 특징과 활용법에 대해 알아보겠습니다. 빻티쉬 av

사 네미 겐야 죽음 Lol league of legends score search fow 포우 league of legends stats, replay, and other information provided. Lol league of legends score search fow 포우 league of legends stats, replay, and other information provided. 포다이스 혈관각화종은 일반적으로 전염성이 read more. 그들은 포르노 만화를 전문으로 하는 이 신뢰할 수 있는 포르노 웹사이트에 액세스 read more. 몇년 동안 사람들이 언급하지만 본적이 없어서혼자 상상의나래를 펼치는 중임.

사라하우스 #건대 전체보기 1,958개의 글 목록열기 이 블로그 전체 카테고리 글. 플레이어의 롤 전적을 갱신하고 한 눈에 확인하세요. 몇년 동안 사람들이 언급하지만 본적이 없어서혼자 상상의나래를 펼치는 중임. 소환사의 협곡, 칼바람 나락, 우르프, 아레나 등 다양한. Lol › multi › krmultisearch fow.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.