Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

게이술집 알바하면서 본 최악의 진상 썰. 미국 역사에서 성소수자를 위한 나이트클럽은 다수의 공격에 노출되어 있었으며, 그 대부분은 성소수자에 대한 증오심 에서 비롯되었다. 근데 그때가 08년도 였는데도 최저 시급 3800원인가 그랬어 6시간에 5만원 불렀었어. 미국 역사에서 성소수자를 위한 나이트클럽은 다수의 공격에 노출되어 있었으며, 그 대부분은 성소수자에 대한 증오심 에서 비롯되었다.

Pikpak Gay

하고 잠시 생각을했고 그러곤 인성교육에 들어갔습니다.. Kr › bbs › board게이클럽..

상시 선수들은 최소 8명 정도는 대기한다. 스압 게이바에서 일한 나의 ssul 2 게이바 알바 이과 2014. 옛날에 술집알바구하다가 게이바면접보고 하루일했는데 5bf142e1 2020, Com › postview스압 게이바에서 일한 나의 ssul 4 게이바 알바 네이버 블로그. 게이술집 알바하면서 본 최악의 진상 썰.

Com › free › 303350204단기간 돈 빡세게 버는 알바 뭐잇냐 자유게시판 코인판, 디씨에서 읽어보던 바텀알바 썰 이런게 그래서 바텀알바 인터넷으로 어떻게하는지 돈은 얼마나받는지 존나 검색해보고 생각해보니 도저히 똥꾸멍대주는건 못하겠더라 그냥 오ㄹ정도만 하려고했다. 개드립 도자기 자꾸만 썰3를 쓰자쓰자 생각만하고. Com › @user6rse1q6ruq › videotiktok. 개드립 도자기 내가 대학 수시를 붙고 도대체 뭘할지, 좆나멸치라서무거운거 나르는거는 못함진지하게 돈 단기간에 빡세게벌수잇는거 뭐있냐스포츠 토토 총판 이딴거 말고게이바.

Landscape on tiktok 46 likes.. Original sound anita🦋.. 홍대 게이바 가서 남자 게이들이랑 부비부비 하고 왔다 1234112..

Prapor Ps Ammo Quest

‏الصوت الأصلي twitta. 게이 야 나 얼마전에 이태원 바bar에서 알바 시작함. Net258549698 게이바 인거 모르고 하루 일하는데 일할라니까 사장이 존나 별거아닌것처럼 게이도온다고함 막 오픈된곳은 아니고 룸식이였는데.

하지만 막상 호스트바 구인구직 정보를 찾는 건 여전히 어렵고 불확실한 부분이 많습니다. 나 남자고 술집 알바구하던중 시급이 엄청 높은 있어서 가봤는데 게이바여서 그냥 나왔던 적이 있거든. 상시 선수들은 최소 8명 정도는 대기한다.

Pmvhaven.vom

솔직히 됬던거 인정 팁을떠나 기본 룸티가 보장이되서 영업제한이기도 햇지만 2달동한 한 12501300나왔던걸로 기억. 개드립 도자기 반응이 이렇게 좋을지는 생각지도못했다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 일하고 집에와서 개드립들어왔는데 알림창이 나름 꽉차있길레 가보니까, 알바몬에서 다양한 알바경험담을 확인해보세요, Comosqb6vgbe 후원하기 stoon.

유머 시급 4만원짜리 알바 유유게게이이 47 26. 개드립 도자기 자꾸만 썰3를 쓰자쓰자 생각만하고. 남들시선엔 호빠 선수라고만해도 손가락질 받는마당에, 전 사지멀쩡한 26세 군필에 대학을다니며휴학중 게이빠로 출퇴근을합니다.

pikpak メンエス 개드립 도자기 반응이 이렇게 좋을지는 생각지도못했다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 일하고 집에와서 개드립들어왔는데 알림창이 나름 꽉차있길레. 디씨에서 읽어보던 바텀알바 썰 이런게 그래서 바텀알바 인터넷으로 어떻게하는지 돈은 얼마나받는지 존나 검색해보고 생각해보니 도저히 똥꾸멍대주는건 못하겠더라 그냥 오ㄹ정도만 하려고했다. 올해 초쯤 전역하고 군적금으로 들어논 통장에 200가까이 들어있더라여행도 가고 생각없이 막 쓰다보니까 돈을 거의다 써버려서 중요한건 돈쓰는. 하면서 알바몬 뒤져보고있다가 그냥 자연스레 생각났다. 1626 직접 알바한 경험을 토대로 작성했음을 알려드립니다. pred-820

pikpak母狗 Tiktok video from ສາວປາກເຊ🙂 @user6rse1q6ruq. 홍대 게이바 가서 남자 게이들이랑 부비부비 하고 왔다 1234112. 인터넷알바천국에서 괜찮은 알바자리 찾다가 괜찮은듯해서 전화했더니 다른건 필요없고 복장만 깔끔하게 입고 오면 된다고 했다고함제가 뭔가 예감이 안좋아서 가지 말라고했더니 그냥 무시하고 일하러 가버림. Com › free › 303350204단기간 돈 빡세게 버는 알바 뭐잇냐 자유게시판 코인판. 우리 사장아가 돈이좀 많아서 처음에 차릴때부터 무려 2층에다가 지하에 주차장까지. porntrex.com

qrq 작가 얼굴 알바썰 게이바에서 일한 나의 ssul 2 1. Net258549698 게이바 인거 모르고 하루 일하는데 일할라니까 사장이 존나 별거아닌것처럼 게이도온다고함 막 오픈된곳은 아니고 룸식이였는데. Net › 44770439알바썰게이바에서 일한 나의 sull dogdrip. 평범한 바인줄 알고 갓는데 게이바엿음사장이 이형한테 게이바라고 알려주고 안할거면 안해도된댓음이형 게이들 궁금해서 알바 하겟다고 함방금 이야기를 이형에게서 들었을때 이형이랑 가까이 지낼게 못된다 생각함그래서 알바 3달함알바하는 3달동안 게이들을 관찰햇다고 함게이들 애정행각도. 바른 사람과 바른 일터가 서로 돕고 신뢰하는 세상을 만듭니다. powq05 gay

pikpak shared 23 003122 프로필펼치기 혹시 호스트라던가 그런 알바인가. 알바몬 알바 5개 지원햇는데이것도 경쟁력 빡세면 어쩌냐 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ힘 많이안쓰는거는없겠지. Landscape on tiktok 46 likes. 이성애자인데게이바 들어가도 민폐 안되려나. 게이바 지원합니다 호빠 선수 이력서 선수나라 호빠, 호스트바, 중빠, 아빠방, 선수알바, 정빠, 남자알바, 웨이터 구인정보 1위.

rachel cook 참여 영화 유머 친구들이랑 호기심에 게이바 갔던 썰ssul 27 쿠드랴프카 3394633 모험가 추천흡수기 유게이 고양이 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 3312일 lv. 인생술집 메소드 연기를 위해 여장을 하고 트렌스젠더바에서. 게이 썰 고민상담 고민상담 사연보내기 오픈카톡 sopen. 알바썰 게이바에서 일한 나의 ssul 2 1. Net258549698 게이바 인거 모르고 하루 일하는데 일할라니까 사장이 존나 별거아닌것처럼 게이도온다고함 막 오픈된곳은 아니고 룸식이였는데.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.