Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

통일전망대 분단 현실이 발아래 펼쳐져 있는 곳으로 분단의 아픔과 통일을 염원하는 마음을 되새기고자 1984년에 지어졌으며, 이후 수십만 명의 실향민과 관광객이 찾아와 이산의 상처를 달래고 통일을 기원하였다. 591 followers, 64 following, 0 posts. 님들 라면드시지마세요 님들 라면드시지마세요 체질이라는게바뀝니다 예를들어. 737년 신라 효성왕 1년 고자군으로 개칭되었다가, 신라 경덕왕 16년에 주군현을 중국식으로 개정할 때 고자군 古自郡을 고성군으로 개칭하였다.

Hoe Iqos Originals Duo Te Gebruiken

70m 높이의 전망대 꼭대기에서 북쪽의 해금강과 금강산을 바라보면서 사진을 찍어보세요.. Likes, 4 comments jeongjeongun99 on janu 꼬성.. 이 사찰에서 가장 흥미로운 유물은 당나라 때 중국에서 사들인 천 년된 부처의 치아 사리 유물예요.. 199 1333 20 1 19746096 필터나 빼고와 줫대지련아 ㅇㅇ118..

Hitomi Smalldom Man

Hitomi School

공룡 화석지가 유명해 공룡의 고장 으로도 불리며, 해변과 산이 조화를 이루어 자연 속에서 힐링할 수 있는 명소가 많습니다, 371 followers, 69 following, 0 posts 꼬성 @smrmaakxoalsqudtls on instagram. Com › h100489 › 223994423696강원도 고성 가볼만한곳 6곳 마차진해수욕장 통일전망대 포함 국내. 이번 글에서는 강원도 고성 가볼만한곳 베스트10 을 정리해. 통일전망대 분단 현실이 발아래 펼쳐져 있는 곳으로 분단의 아픔과 통일을 염원하는 마음을 되새기고자 1984년에 지어졌으며, 이후 수십만 명의 실향민과 관광객이 찾아와 이산의 상처를 달래고 통일을 기원하였다.

Hentai Segma

현지 판매점에서 북한 과자와 시원한 북한. 199 1333 20 1 19746096 필터나 빼고와 줫대지련아 ㅇㅇ118. 공룡 테마파크부터 당항포해양공원까지, 고성의 매력적인 관광지를 함께 확인해보세요.

Hitomila Miel

이번 글에서는 강원도 고성 가볼만한곳 베스트10 을 정리해. 591 followers, 64 following, 0 posts. 이번 글에서는 강원도 고성 가볼만한곳 베스트10 을 정리해, 현지 판매점에서 북한 과자와 시원한 북한. 이번 글에서는 강원도 고성 가볼만한곳 베스트10 을 정리해. 강원도 고성 가볼만한곳 국내 패키지 여행 feat.

hiomi.la 고성 가볼만한곳 베스트10 +명소 추천 경상남도 고성 은 아름다운 해안선과 역사적인 유적지, 자연경관이 어우러진 매력적인 여행지입니다. Com2025년 7월 28일 위 신규 주소로 국내 모든 isp에서 우회없이 접속 가능합니다. 호면 수락관에 얘기해서 나 꼬성을 하나 만드렸어야 하는 게 아닌가. 경남 고성의 숨은 명소 베스트 10곳을 현지인의 시선으로 소개합니다. 70m 높이의 전망대 꼭대기에서 북쪽의 해금강과 금강산을 바라보면서 사진을 찍어보세요. houkago no yuutousei mangadex

hitomi sister 한국어 독하네 진짜 dc official app. 이번 모임에는 솔캠을 즐기는 캠퍼들과 가족캠퍼, 젊음이 느껴지는 청춘캠퍼, 지긋하신 선배 캠퍼님들의 어울림속에서 만남을 가졌는데요, 행사 동안 read more. Com › h100489 › 223994423696강원도 고성 가볼만한곳 6곳 마차진해수욕장 통일전망대 포함 국내. 공룡 테마파크부터 당항포해양공원까지, 고성의 매력적인 관광지를 함께 확인해보세요. 開心同大家一齊觀賞janees 2025遇妍演唱會💜. hitomi.la pop

htms-114 missav 한자로는 다르지만 10 이름이 강원특별자치도 고성군 과 같아서 헷갈리기 쉬운 곳이다. 371 followers, 69 following, 0 posts 꼬성 @smrmaakxoalsqudtls on instagram. 122 꼬성2物牛子辦特別鳴謝： 신카리1 pーproject janees bagaa 青藤量生置增地： crisathena paris parh 票務： kktix 能胶面權macpherson 夢花经品. 동해안 최북단 강원특별자치도 고성군 현내면 명호리의 해발 70미터 고지 위에. 199 1333 20 1 19746096 필터나 빼고와 줫대지련아 ㅇㅇ118. h밤가드

hitomi 보지 공룡 테마파크부터 당항포해양공원까지, 고성의 매력적인 관광지를 함께 확인해보세요. 609 followers, 66 following, 0 posts. 통일전망대 분단 현실이 발아래 펼쳐져 있는 곳으로 분단의 아픔과 통일을 염원하는 마음을 되새기고자 1984년에 지어졌으며, 이후 수십만 명의 실향민과 관광객이 찾아와 이산의 상처를 달래고 통일을 기원하였다. 님들 라면드시지마세요 님들 라면드시지마세요 체질이라는게바뀝니다 예를들어. Com › entry › 강원도고성강원도 고성 가볼만한곳 베스트10.

hitoni kor neto Dc official app 갤닉네임입니다. 웹툰에서 회차를 소장할 수 있는 재화입니다. 동해안 최북단 강원특별자치도 고성군 현내면 명호리의 해발 70미터 고지 위에. 미니멀웍스 인비테이션 가슴뛰는 만남 at 목계솔밭. Org › collection › nclcollectionstoreinternational atomic energy agency.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.