Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

남아동 키즈 래쉬가드세트2피스+수모 yaw1856_bk 37,600 원 네이버페이 에어워크서프몰 남아동 키즈 래쉬가드 2피스+수모 yaw1839 37,600 원 네이버페이 에어워크서프몰 남아동 키즈 래쉬가드세트2피스+수모 yaw1858_bk 44,300 원 네이버페이 에어워크서프몰 남유아. 신세계몰에서 아동주니어패션 스포츠웨어수영복 수영복 추천인기 상품부터 가격할인 혜택까지 만나보세요. 155 elinboa 여아 수영복 풀세트 40000원 여아 수영복. 일본 아레나 여아 탄탄이 수영복 130사이즈 판매합니다.

이안 Cum

어린이 수영복의 다나와 통합검색 결과입니다. 실내 어린이 수영장의 수온은 평균적으로 30도32도를 유지합니다. 우리 아이 첫 수영복 뭐가 좋을지 고민하고 계시다면. 오늘출발 오전 11시 전 주문시 배송비 3,000원, 155 elinboa 여아 수영복 풀세트 40000원 여아 수영복, What swimsuit should my child wear.

Com에서 신생아유아패션 스포츠웨어수영복 수영복 추천인기 상품부터 가격할인 혜택까지 만나보세요, 수영코치 러블리스위머와 함께하는 키즈 수영복 best. 여아수영복 아디다스 수영 3st 스윔수트 주니어 원피스 수영복 bp5449 아디다스 수영 그래픽스윔 주니어 원피스 수영복 cv4666 아디다스 수영 아동 겨울왕국 원피스.

건 배송비 2,500원조건부 배럴 본사직영 여아 베이직 라인백 스커트 반신 수영복 딥네이비 b6skswh301dnv 89,000원 무료배송 내셔널지오그래픽키즈 본사직영.. 실내 어린이 수영장의 수온은 평균적으로 30도32도를 유지합니다..

What swimsuit should my child wear, 쿠팡이 추천하는 아동여아수영복 특가를 만나보세요, 건 3만↑무료배송 레노마수영복 폴리백 증정 레노마수영복 여아동 플라워 프릴 실내원피스수영복gf21802 최고판매가 42,000 원 10,000 원 9,000원 10 % 4. 신세계몰에서 여자실내수영복 최저가 상품부터 여자실내수영복 추천인기 상품까지, 할인 가격으로 만나보세요, 건 3만↑무료배송 레노마수영복 폴리백 증정 레노마수영복 여아동 플라워 프릴 실내원피스수영복gf21802 최고판매가 42,000 원 10,000 원 9,000원 10 % 4. 폴리백 증정 레노마수영복 여아동 플라워 프릴 실내원피스수영복gf21802.

허벅지부분 길이는 4부정도 사이즈인데 기존 수영복 디자인과 달리 살짝 넉넉하게 디자인되어 입고벗기 수월해요, 한사이즈 컸으면 펄럭펄럭 해서 수영시 불편했을 것 같은데 70으로하면서 아주 딱입니다 아이말로 물안에 들어갔더니 더 편하다고해요♡, 3부반신 수영복 아이 수영 강습을 시작하면서 아레나 3부 반신 수영복을 구매했습니다 😊 요즘 수영복은 기능도 디자인도 정말 잘, 브랜드명 티에스스포츠아동수영복 남아 5부팬츠 래쉬가드 여아 원피스 집업 어린이 주니어 실내 강습용 초등학교 생존수영 아레나33,000원 오늘출발 무료배송오후 3시.

건 배송비 2,500원조건부 배럴 본사직영 여아 베이직 라인백 스커트 반신 수영복 딥네이비 b6skswh301dnv 89,000원 무료배송 내셔널지오그래픽키즈 본사직영. 어린이 수영복의 다나와 통합검색 결과입니다. What swimsuit should my child wear. 바닷가에서 수영할 때처럼 래시가드를 입혀야 되나.

여자아이 수영복 최저가 상품 가격비교와 함께 핫딜검색, 할인혜택, 특가 정보를 확인하세요. Com에서 신생아유아패션 스포츠웨어수영복 수영복 추천인기 상품부터 가격할인 혜택까지 만나보세요, 디자인 예쁘고 퀄리티 좋은 아이수영복 찾으신다면 스네프 추천드립니다.

이승아 디시

0204 아레나 여아 수영복 75000.. This content isnt available..

아동 수영복 바지 래쉬가드 초등 래쉬가드 워터레깅스 실내 쥬니어 학생 여자아이 주니어래쉬가드 여아수영복 레쉬 키즈래쉬가드 남아래쉬가드 어린이래쉬가드 아동래쉬가드 주니어 수영복 키즈레쉬가 등록월 2024. G마켓 내 초등여아수영복 검색결과입니다. 남아동 키즈 래쉬가드세트2피스+수모 yaw1856_bk 37,600 원 네이버페이 에어워크서프몰 남아동 키즈 래쉬가드 2피스+수모 yaw1839 37,600 원 네이버페이 에어워크서프몰 남아동 키즈 래쉬가드세트2피스+수모 yaw1858_bk 44,300 원 네이버페이 에어워크서프몰 남유아, 무료배송 신세계백화점 탑텐키즈 남,녀 실내 생존 일체형 수영복 키트mke5ip12012201 최고판매가 21,900원 19,900원 16,462원 17% 4. 폴리백 증정 레노마수영복 여아동 플라워 프릴 실내원피스수영복gf21802.

0204 아레나 여아 수영복 75000. 바닷가에서 수영할 때처럼 래시가드를 입혀야 되나, 여아수영복 아디다스 수영 3st 스윔수트 주니어 원피스 수영복 bp5449 아디다스 수영 그래픽스윔 주니어 원피스 수영복 cv4666 아디다스 수영 아동 겨울왕국 원피스. 여아 수영복 벗긴 20대 남성 shorts ytn, 관심 스키보드수영 수영복 아동용 쿠팡.

이주은 따먹

우리 아이 첫 수영복 뭐가 좋을지 고민하고 계시다면, 레노마 여아동 u백 리본 원피스수영복, Com › search어린이수영복 추천인기 상품, 신세계몰, 오늘출발 오전 11시 전 주문시 배송비 3,000원. 여자아이 수영복 최저가 검색, 최저가 26760원, 쿠팡이 추천하는 여자어린이수영복 관련 혜택과 특가.

익헨 뷰어 건 3만↑무료배송 레노마수영복 폴리백 증정 레노마수영복 여아동 플라워 프릴 실내원피스수영복gf21802 최고판매가 42,000 원 10,000 원 9,000원 10 % 4. 아동 수영복 바지 래쉬가드 초등 래쉬가드 워터레깅스 실내 쥬니어 학생 여자아이 주니어래쉬가드 여아수영복 레쉬 키즈래쉬가드 남아래쉬가드 어린이래쉬가드 아동래쉬가드 주니어 수영복 키즈레쉬가 등록월 2024. 155 elinboa 여아 수영복 풀세트 40000원 여아 수영복. 여아주니어래쉬가드 여자아이 생존수영 집업 자매수영복 sf82 스피도 여자 어린이 fastskin pro3 여아동 5부 선수수영복 scg12101fnb 스피도 여자. Com › search어린이수영복 추천인기 상품, 신세계몰. 이시다 아키라 결혼

이쉔 나이시 디시 Ts스포츠 여아동 수영복 반신 3부 원피스 여아 어린이 주니어 실내 수영장 강습용 초등학교 생존수영 23012. 아기수영복 래쉬가드 여아 주니어 여아원피스 여아 키즈 여자. 아레나, 스피도, 펑키타, 센티, 배럴, 오닐, 르망고, 미즈노, 티어, 후그 수영복 및 수영용품. Com › dsearch어린이여자수영복 다나와 통합검색. 브랜드명 티에스스포츠아동수영복 남아 5부팬츠 래쉬가드 여아 원피스 집업 어린이 주니어 실내 강습용 초등학교 생존수영 아레나33,000원 오늘출발 무료배송오후 3시. 이이경 블로그 원본

이비 티에스 폰지 폴리백 증정 레노마수영복 여아동 플라워 프릴 실내원피스수영복gf21802. 처음 물에 들어가면 따뜻한 느낌이 드는 정도라고 생각하시면 되세요. 남아동 키즈 래쉬가드세트2피스+수모 yaw1856_bk 37,600 원 네이버페이 에어워크서프몰 남아동 키즈 래쉬가드 2피스+수모 yaw1839 37,600 원 네이버페이 에어워크서프몰 남아동 키즈 래쉬가드세트2피스+수모 yaw1858_bk 44,300 원 네이버페이 에어워크서프몰 남유아. Com › kokr › collections여자 수영복 소녀 수영복 써니비키니 – sunnybikinis. Com › search어린이수영복 추천인기 상품, 신세계몰. 이세돌 erome

이세돌 유튜브 디시 수영복 뿐만 아니라 튜브, 물안경, 아쿠아슈즈, 물놀이용품 없는게 없어요 스네프 아동 감성 바로크 스윔웨어 원피스 수영복 유아 어린이 스네프 스네프 스네프 공식 스마트스토어 smartstore. 무료배송 신세계백화점 탑텐키즈 남,녀 실내 생존 일체형 수영복 키트mke5ip12012201 최고판매가 21,900원 19,900원 16,462원 17% 4. 여자 연예인 수영복 비키니 모음 네이버 블로그 셀럽패션 113개의 글 목록열기. 여자아이 수영복에 대한 검색 결과는 총 1549 개입니다. 오늘출발 오전 11시 전 주문시 배송비 3,000원.

이안 꼴림 그는 충동이 억제되지 않았다며 혐의를 인정한 것으로 알려졌습니다. Com › kokr › collections여자 수영복 소녀 수영복 써니비키니 – sunnybikinis. 그는 충동이 억제되지 않았다며 혐의를 인정한 것으로 알려졌습니다. 고잉키즈 주말단3일 전상품 키즈 래쉬가드상하수영복여아수영복남아수영복. 아동 수영복 바지 래쉬가드 초등 래쉬가드 워터레깅스 실내 쥬니어 학생 여자아이 주니어래쉬가드 여아수영복 레쉬 키즈래쉬가드 남아래쉬가드 어린이래쉬가드 아동래쉬가드 주니어 수영복 키즈레쉬가 등록월 2024.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.