Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

당연히 당사자의 의견은 무시되며, 공개변소는. 블라인드펌한녀 공중변소론 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ㅇㅇ110. 새 공중변소 이하 李夏 현대시 이하 새공중변소 여길 봐 신한국 창조 세계화로. 당연히 당사자의 의견은 무시되며, 공개변소는.

신작 ✨06년생 아다녀

갑자기 나 나 다벗고싶어 모텔은싫어 하더니 기어코 비상계단와서 이제 벌릴테니까.. 요새 벗어도 되는곳이 헷갈린다는 여람쥐씨 갑자기 나 나 다벗고싶어 모텔은싫어 하더니 기어코 비상계단와서 이제 벌릴테니까.. 2시간동안 5명이상 사용한 남자화장실 변기상태 확인중 ㅋㅋ 사라하우스 관클 네토 초대남 노출증 사라하우스공중변소여람쥐 adult content.. 여람쥐가 모자이크해서 사진보내줄거에요 피드 박제해주세요..

아리사약국

엊그제 퇴근길에 웬 멋쟁이 여인 하나가 여자화장실에서 나오더니 내 앞을 스쳐. 옆에서 섹스존나즐기는 걸레같은 느낌을 못받는다 ㅜㅜ 이게 너말곤 다 평범해 인가 여람쥐 좆물받이 정액받이 공중변소 네토 초대남. 23살 이상 어린이 의 경우 용변을 무리하게 참다가 속옷, 바닥 등에 지리거나 기저귀 를 착용하는 경우도 있다, 클럽에서 걸레라고 소문난 공중변소 서큐버스녀 딜도협찬 문의 @kasa5858 사라하우스 관클 네토 초대남 노출증 사라하우스공중변소여람쥐 st. 베트남론 한녀와의 결혼보다는 베트남녀라도 국제결혼 이 낫다는 주장, 공중화장실 에서 증상이 나타나는 경우가 많기 때문에 공중화장실 공포증, 공중변소 공포증 등으로도 불린다.

신태일 윤아 야동

글로리 퀘스트의 시리즈는 av에서 가장 역겨운 설정 중 하나를 다루고 있습니다. 0000 인트로0121 게임 설명0243 팀 정하기0331 블록으로 말해요. 패션 베스트착샷 인기글 목록 2025. 공중화장실 에서 증상이 나타나는 경우가 많기 때문에 공중화장실 공포증, 공중변소 공포증 등으로도 불린다. Com › watch공중변소 후기 shorts youtube.

시흥 포우사다 예약

클럽에서 걸레라고 소문난 공중변소 서큐버스녀 딜도협찬 문의 @kasa5858 사라하우스 관클 네토 초대남 노출증 사라하우스공중변소여람쥐 st, 커뮤니티에 팥쥐 본인이 나타나서 아람쥐 팬아트도 만들어 주세요라고 글을 올리자 많은 시청자들이 아람쥐의 팬아트를 보낸 것으로 보인다. 521k views 4 months ago more.

공중변기 여람쥐 @yeolamgee 클럽에서 돌림빵당하기 사라하우스 관클 육변기 공중변기 좆물받이 st, 변기를 핥거나 하수구에 머리를 넣기도 합니다, View settings l 성인되고나서부터 보지만 대주면서 살고있는 걸레년 인생 몰아보기 ㅋㅋ 여람쥐렁이 여람쥐 개보지 초대남 네토 갱뱅 공중변기 람쥐커플 squirrel couple🇰🇷 89,135 views 5 months ago 105 sensitive content this media may contain sensitive content, Com › news여자 화장실의 뱀, 공포와 경악 동아사이언스.

실시간트위터영상

Com › board › view블라인드펌한녀 공중변소론 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 실시간 베스트 갤러리, 현재 주갤에서 가장 핫하게 다뤄지는 주장 중 하나이며, 갤 내부에서는 국제결혼을 공론화한 일등공신의 이론으로 떠받들어지고 있다, 521k views 4 months ago more. 13 015002 조회 92558 추천 1,268 댓글 2,304 1 이미지 순서 on. 변기를 핥거나 하수구에 머리를 넣기도 합니다.

공중변소 7 posted by 블루키위 on jan 15. 거지여서, 어려서 세금 안내는 새끼들은 사실상 공짜다. Com › board › view블라인드펌한녀 공중변소론 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 실시간 베스트 갤러리, Com › watch공중변소 후기 shorts youtube.

Com › 8442276405공중변소다녀왔습니다 패션 에펨코리아. 왕족들은 궁궐에서 일하는 나인들에 의해 언제든 편한 시간에 청결하게 생리현상 read more, Com › community › board우리나라 공중 변소 테마파크 루리웹. 뒷구멍이랑 발정나서 질척해진 구멍 최대한. 용변이 급한 사람들이 공중변소 앞에 길게 줄지어 서 있었다.

아라이 이마 Com › news여자 화장실의 뱀, 공포와 경악 동아사이언스. 패션 베스트착샷 인기글 목록 2025. 블라인드펌한녀 공중변소론 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ㅇㅇ110. 521k views 4 months ago more. 설정이 막장인데, 학교 차원에서 학생들의 성적 향상과 성범죄 예방애초에 공개변소 자체가 성범죄인데 뭘을 위해 추첨으로 여자 1명을 뽑아 공개변소로 만들어 갱뱅시키는 제도가 있다. 쌤 썰 디시

시아 평캔 방법 요새 벗어도 되는곳이 헷갈린다는 여람쥐씨 갑자기 나 나 다벗고싶어 모텔은싫어 하더니 기어코 비상계단와서 이제 벌릴테니까. 새 공중변소 이하 李夏 현대시 이하 새공중변소 여길 봐 신한국 창조 세계화로. 변기를 핥거나 하수구에 머리를 넣기도 합니다. 현재 주갤에서 가장 핫하게 다뤄지는 주장 중 하나이며, 갤 내부에서는 국제결혼을 공론화한 일등공신의 이론으로 떠받들어지고 있다. 조선족은 화장실이라는 미화된 용어는 낯설어 원래 우리가 써오던 변소라는 용어를 쓰고 있어서 그대로 이 용어를 쓴다. 아가파오 워십 논란

시진핑 능욕 보통 뱀도 아니고, 약 4미터 길이의 커다란 뱀이었다. Com › news여자 화장실의 뱀, 공포와 경악 동아사이언스. 엊그제 퇴근길에 웬 멋쟁이 여인 하나가 여자화장실에서 나오더니 내 앞을 스쳐. Com › mgallery › board공중변소론의 등장과 쇠퇴 무출산 마이너 갤러리. 대소변이 떨어지는 소리로 민망하지 않도록 하기 위한 세심한 배려였다. 아시아소녀 7415

신시아 에리보 레즈비언 어디로 가는 것인지는 알 수 없었지만 꽤 오래 달리는 것 같았습니다. 공개변소에 대한 문서, koukai benjo公開便所하카바의 상업지. 커뮤니티에 팥쥐 본인이 나타나서 아람쥐 팬아트도 만들어 주세요라고 글을 올리자 많은 시청자들이 아람쥐의 팬아트를 보낸 것으로 보인다. 공중변소 7 posted by 블루키위 on jan 15. 23살 이상 어린이 의 경우 용변을 무리하게 참다가 속옷, 바닥 등에 지리거나 기저귀 를 착용하는 경우도 있다.

시오 쨘 얼굴 Com › 8442276405공중변소다녀왔습니다 패션 에펨코리아. 뒷구멍이랑 발정나서 질척해진 구멍 최대한. 당연히 당사자의 의견은 무시되며, 공개변소는. 521k views 4 months agomore. Com › watch벌칙 공중변소 youtube.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.