Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

에일리 그 사진, 해린 전신 사진, 이안 전신 사진, 레제 전신. 에일리 그 사진, 해린 전신 사진, 이안 전신 사진, 레제 전신. Kr › articles › 146392에일리 추정 누드사진 전 남친이 유출한 듯 위키트리. 공개된 사진에는 한 여성이 전신 누드로 춤을 추거나 포즈를 취하는 모습.

마이팬즈 추천

영어권 한류 연예사이트 올케이팝에 에일리로 추정되는 여성의 전신 누드사진이 공개됐다.. 더팩트 db 고민경 기자 영어권 한류 연예정보 사이트에 에일리라고 주장하는.. 에일리 소속사 a2z엔터테인먼트는 23일 이들 부부의 공식 웨딩사진을 공개했다..

가수 에일리로 추정되는 여성의 전신누드 사진이 유출돼 그 진위 여부에 대한 논란이 가열되고 있다, 과거 온라인 커뮤니티에 에일리 폭풍 월드인맥이라는 제목으로 올라온 사진에서 에일리는 음악 프로듀서팀 넵튠스의 일원으로 수많은 플래티넘 음반을 제작, 그래미상 3회 수상에 빛나는 퍼렐 윌리엄스 pharrell williams를 비롯해 래퍼이자 배우로 2006년 그래미, 14일 서울 올림픽공원 체조경기장에서 열린 2013 멜론 뮤직 어워드.

마법소녀 Hitomi

에일리 누드사진 거래 의혹, 디스패치 에일리가 분명해 보인다, 올케이팝의 문제의 사진에는 한 여성이 전신 누드로 춤을 추거나 포즈를 취하고 있다, 가수 에일리가 노출사진 유출사건 이후 처음으로 팬들 앞에 섰습니다. 영어권 한류 연예정보 사이트 올케이팝은 10일 오후 에일리로 예상되는. 가수 에일리본명 이예진24로 의심되는 여성의 누드 사진이 인터넷에 유출된 가운데 에일리의 팬 카페가 해당 사진이 에일리 본인으로 밝혀질 경우 팬 클럽에서 탈, 가수 에일리 추정 `전신 누드사진` 유출, 진위 논란.

더팩트 db 고민경 기자 영어권 한류 연예정보 사이트에 에일리라고 주장하는. 에일리 사진유출 논란 에일리, 국내 유포 네티즌도 고소한다강경대응 osen이혜린 기자지난 11일 누드사진 유출 사건으로 피해를 입은 가수 에일리가 국내 유포에 일조한 네티즌에게도 법적 소송에 들어간다. 사진 속 에일리는 깜찍한 교복 차림으로 카메라를.

인터넷매체 디스패치는 지난 7월 19일 자신을 에일리의 전 남자친구라고 밝힌 남성이 에일리의 전신 누드사진을 갖고 있다며 기사화를 부탁했다고. 에일리 소속사 a2z엔터테인먼트는 23일 이들 부부의 공식 웨딩사진을 공개했다. Kr › news › photo가수 에일리 추정 &grave. 올케이팝측은 k팝 스타 에일리와 비슷한 여성으로 보인다라는 설명과 함께 에일리로 추측되는 여성이 전신 누드로 카메라를 보며 노래를 부르는 사진, 올케이팝은 익명의 웹사이트와 커뮤니티에 에일리로 의심되는 누드 사진이 다수 업로드 됐다며 사진이 흐릿하게 처리됐지만 사진 속의 여성과 에일리가 매우 흡사하다는 것을 확인할 수 있다고 전했다. 이에 누리꾼들은 사진 속 배경이 에일리가 데뷔 전 유투브에 올렸던 방.

많이 먹는 사람 디시

가수 에일리로 추정되는 여성의 전신 누드 사진이 유출돼 파문이 일고 있다. 올케이팝의 문제의 사진에는 한 여성이 전신 누드로 춤을 추거나 포즈를 취하고 있다. 에일리로 추정되는 누드사진을 공개한 영어권 한류 연예사이트 올케이팝이 네티즌들 사이에서 화제다. Ystarailee tears at the official place because of opened. 에일리와 닮아보이기는 하지만 동일인물인지는 확인된 바 없다. 사진 속 여성은 전신 누드 상태로 포즈를 취하고 있는 모습으로, 언뜻 보기에는 에일리와 닮아 보이지만 조명이 어둡고 얼굴이 자세히 나오지 않아.

가수 에일리가 노출사진 유출사건 이후 처음으로 팬들 앞에 섰습니다. 가수 에일리로 추정되는 여성의 전신 누드 사진이 유출돼 파문이 일고 있다. 에일리 알몸 사진 유출, 증거 속속 등장.

에일리티브이데일리 강효진 기자 에일리가 교복 전신샷을 공개했다. 에일리로 추정되는 누드사진을 공개한 영어권 한류 연예사이트 올케이팝이 네티즌들 사이에서 화제다. 에일리 그 사진, 해린 전신 사진, 이안 전신 사진, 레제 전신. 가수 에일리가 누드 사진 유출이라는 의혹을 받고 있어 화제다.

마이 비데 나무위키 가수 에일리로 추정되는 여성의 전신 누드 사진이 유출돼 파문이 일고 있다. 가수 에일리로 추정되는 여성의 전신누드 사진이 유출돼 그 진위 여부에 대한 논란이 가열되고 있다. 누드 사진 유출과 관련해 당사자인 가수 에일리 측이 공식 입장을 밝혔다. 가수 에일리본명 이예진24로 의심되는 여성의 누드 사진이 인터넷에 유출된 가운데 에일리의 팬 카페가 해당 사진이 에일리 본인으로 밝혀질 경우 팬 클럽에서 탈. 에일리 올케이팝 누드사진 유출 의혹, 에일리는 누구. 마그피스 얼굴

맹숙 사진 에일리는 2일 자신의 인스타그램에 snl 히힛 드림하이2 이후로 오랜만에 교복. 가수 에일리로 추정되는 누드영상이 유출돼 논란이 일고 있다. Com › article › 201311110540804에일리 추정女, 올누드 사진 유출 파문&mldr. 에일리 사진유출 논란 에일리, 국내 유포 네티즌도 고소한다강경대응 osen이혜린 기자지난 11일 누드사진 유출 사건으로 피해를 입은 가수 에일리가 국내 유포에 일조한 네티즌에게도 법적 소송에 들어간다. 지난 10일 올케이팝은 에일리로 예상되는 여성의 누드사진이 유출됐다며 동양인 여성의 모습을 담은 누드 사진. 마운자로 bmi 디시

머리 커보이는 이유 디시 공개된 사진에는 한 여성이 전신 누드로 춤을 추거나 포즈를 취하는 모습이 담겨있다. 에일리 그 사진, 해린 전신 사진, 이안 전신 사진, 레제 전신. Kr › news › entertainment에일리 추정 19금 누드 사진 유출, 네티즌 반응이&mldr. Kr › news › entertainment에일리 추정 19금 누드 사진 유출, 네티즌 반응이&mldr. 에일리 소속사 a2z엔터테인먼트는 23일 이들 부부의 공식 웨딩사진을 공개했다. 마젠타 움짤

만지지마세요 코테사시군 디시 누드 사진 유출과 관련해 당사자인 가수 에일리 측이 공식 입장을 밝혔다. Kr › news › entertainment에일리 추정 19금 누드 사진 유출, 네티즌 반응이&mldr. 사진 속 여성은 전신 누드 상태로 포즈를 취하고 있는 모습으로, 언뜻 보기에는 에일리와 닮아 보이지만 조명이 어둡고 얼굴이 자세히 나오지 않아. Kr › articles › 146392에일리 추정 누드사진 전 남친이 유출한 듯 위키트리. 에일리 누드사진 올케이팝에 유출, 맞다 아니다.

망고넷 에일리로 추정되는 누드사진을 공개한 영어권 한류 연예사이트 올케이팝이 네티즌들 사이에서 화제다. 공개된 사진은 한 여성이 전신 누드로 춤을 추거나 포즈를 취하는 모습을 담고 있는데, 가수 에일리와 닮아 보이긴 하지만 조명이 어두워 얼굴이 확실히. 가수 에일리로 추정되는 여성의 전신 누드 사진이 유출돼 파문이 일고 있다. Kr › news › entertainment에일리 추정 19금 누드 사진 유출, 네티즌 반응이&mldr. 지난 10일 올케이팝은 에일리로 예상되는 여성의 누드사진이 유출됐다며 동양인 여성의 모습을 담은 누드 사진.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.