Com › shorts › 19t3es40ws0海莉很熱情地跟觀眾打招呼啊啦啦隊 啦啦隊女孩 cheerleader 金海.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

其中南韓 kt 巫師代表「金海莉」這次參與桃園亞洲職棒交流賽宣傳記者會，是她第一次訪台。 「金海莉」神似南韓人氣女團 memoland 成員 nacy，過往曾是女團lipbubble 成員，她的身材高挑、美貌出眾，亮眼外型堪稱偶像級，被封為「最頂啦啦隊」。現年25歲的「金海莉」去年結婚終結單身，仍難擋高人. 韓國啦啦隊女神劉夏英（유하영）近日低調來台，過去出身偶像女團的她，與韓國職棒kt巫師女神、台灣職籃領航猿啦啦隊女神金海莉（김해리. Com › popular › 金海莉老公金海莉老公 instagram. Watch short videos about 金海莉老公 from people around the world.

Aiue Oka 근황

Asmr Mimo Leak

金海莉受封最頂人妻啦啦隊，超辣「魔笛舞」編舞人就是她！ 李珠珢前隊長金韓拿宣布結婚！與應援團長步入禮堂被 封「黃金應援cp.. Day ago 然而今（28）日卻傳出有4支韓職球隊禁止旗下女孩兩邊跳，韓華鷹、三星獅、樂天巨人以及kt巫師皆達成共識，不僅金海莉、李藝斌、朴淡備等女孩恐受影響。..

Av리오

問卦 韓啦在嫁為人婦台啦在當小三、搞破鞋？ gossiping板, Com › popular › 金海莉老公金海莉老公 instagram, Com › @ntnudavid › post金海利 김해리：女子組合lip bubble的前成員，去年剛結婚 snam. 獨家／看不到 睦那京、金海莉！韓職4球團開會 禁旗下啦啦隊員應援中職 檸檬果汁：居然看不到嗎🥹 睦那京 金海莉 啦啦隊 （圖／記者劉彥池攝影）.

獨家／看不到 睦那京、金海莉！韓職4球團開會 禁旗下啦啦隊員應援中職 檸檬果汁：居然看不到嗎🥹 睦那京 金海莉 啦啦隊 （圖／記者劉彥池攝影）. 南韓「最頂啦啦隊」金海莉竟然現身台灣？ 消息一出粉絲們驚喜不已！ 金海莉首次訪台，就是為了參加 2025 亞洲職棒交流賽宣傳記者會，近日她還在桃園市區街頭拍下台灣感性美照，趕快來發囉女神的傲人背景和最新行蹤吧！. 251029 桃園巨蛋台鋼獵鷹 vs 桃園璞園領航猿金海莉김해리pilotscrew領航猿 桃園璞園領航猿領航猿啦啦隊 taiwan cheerleader 台湾チアplg.

Alain Candfans

金海丽结婚了吗 金海丽成志贤夫妇抖音 金海丽成志贤恋爱经历 金海丽成志贤夫妇 金海 金海莉 金海丽, 韓啦： 韓華鷹啦啦隊的雙隊長之一李美來，2020年12月6日結婚, Cc › bbs › cheergirlstw商演 金海莉一日店長 看板 cheergirlstw 批踢踢實業坊.

Aznudd

Keywords 金海莉三振舞演出金海莉的, Com › @ntnudavid › post金海利 김해리：女子組合lip bubble的前成員，去年剛結婚 snam. 金海利김해리：女子組合lip bubble的前成員，去年剛結婚snamu. Com › shorts › 19t3es40ws0海莉很熱情地跟觀眾打招呼啊啦啦隊 啦啦隊女孩 cheerleader 金海.

新聞「喧賓奪主的穿搭」啦啦隊女神金海利，意外展現反轉美貌與時尚女王氣場！ 出席金韓拿婚禮展現kt 義氣新郎新娘準備退場simgpoi. ，不見得喔！可能是海莉上輩子拯救了宇宙才對。 超扯顏值身材 金海莉 可惜結婚了珠珠寶寶比較讚. 热门： 南京秦淮灯会年味拉满 挑战100元从广东坐公交回东北 比格比萨环卫工套餐降至9.

av19팬방 「最頂人妻」金海莉外貌揉合清純和冶豔，2019年加入韓職kt巫師啦啦隊「lady wiz」，女團出身的她，為爆紅神曲〈魔笛舞〉的編舞設計人，去年加盟plg聯盟桃園璞. Com › popular › 金海莉結婚金海莉結婚 instagram. Days ago 時間：131 1030 地點：台北國際電玩展的kingshot 攤位m808 參加女孩：金海莉 資訊來源： s. 大家還喜歡嗎～～💕💕 金海莉領航猿pilotscrew stephane montgilbert and 2. 251029 桃園巨蛋台鋼獵鷹 vs 桃園璞園領航猿金海莉김해리pilotscrew領航猿 桃園璞園領航猿領航猿啦啦隊 taiwan cheerleader 台湾チアplg. av19.live

av19 안됨 디시 Keywords 金海莉三振舞演出金海莉的. Keywords 金海莉三振舞演出金海莉的. 韓國啦啦隊女神劉夏英出身女團lipbubble，她和領航猿啦啦隊的金海莉曾是同團成員，《nownews今日新聞》獨家掌握她近來到台灣旅遊，劉夏英接受訪問. 「金海莉」神似南韓人氣女團memoland 成員nacy，過往曾是女團lipbubble 成員，她的身材高挑、美貌出眾，亮眼外型堪稱偶像級，被封為「最頂啦啦隊」。現年25歲. Com › @ntnudavid › post金海利 김해리：女子組合lip bubble的前成員，去年剛結婚 snam. askl12349 leaked

alex10ofc instagram Com › watch已婚啦啦隊員金海莉在台灣爆紅 引爆韓國網路社群. Com › popular › 金海莉結婚金海莉結婚 instagram. Watch short videos about 金海莉老公 from people around the world. 金海莉受封最頂人妻啦啦隊，超辣「魔笛舞」編舞人就是她！ 李珠珢前隊長金韓拿宣布結婚！與應援團長步入禮堂被 封「黃金應援cp. Days ago 新聞標題：看不到睦那京、金海莉！韓職4球團開會 禁旗下啦啦隊員應援中職 新聞來源（縮網址）：s. baby alien girl

allincrew Kt巫師的金海莉是人妻耶南珉貞是退役人妻 金海莉是現役人妻2024年8月24結的婚 還很新鮮的人妻si. Days ago 中職新球季3月底開打，但球迷們關注焦點之一的啦啦隊應援，恐怕傳出變數！體壇傳出消息，韓國職棒有四大球隊在去年底開會，禁止旗下啦啦隊員. 金海莉，外型高佻冷豔，開口說話卻是甜到出汁的奶萌嗓音，超魅力反差迅速征服台灣粉絲。 김해리金海莉kimhaeri 치어리더cheerleader 韓援kt. 韓國啦啦隊女神劉夏英（유하영）近日低調來台，過去出身偶像女團的她，與韓國職棒kt巫師女神、台灣職籃領航猿啦啦隊女神金海莉（김해리. ，不見得喔！可能是海莉上輩子拯救了宇宙才對。 超扯顏值身材 金海莉 可惜結婚了珠珠寶寶比較讚.

amagami yui Watch short videos about 金海莉結婚from people around the world. 韓援旋風持續襲捲全台！先前宣布加盟台灣職籃的韓籍啦啦隊成員金海莉與李藝斌，3號受邀擔任燒肉店一日店長，吸引近百名粉絲參與！不僅在現場. Watch short videos about 金海莉結婚from people around the world. Kt巫師的金海莉是人妻耶南珉貞是退役人妻 金海莉是現役人妻2024年8月24結的婚 還很新鮮的人妻si. 「最頂人妻」金海莉外貌揉合清純和冶豔，2019年加入韓職kt巫師啦啦隊「lady wiz」，女團出身的她，為爆紅神曲〈魔笛舞〉的編舞設計人，去年加盟plg聯盟桃園璞.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.