Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

싱가폴에서 처음타본 크루즈 여행 318322. 크루즈전문여행사 크루즈시티 since 2004. 5m 총 톤수 167,800톤 승객 수 4,000명 최대 4,900명까지 수용 가능 승무원 수 1,716명 층수 20층 ncl 블리스호norwegian bliss는 노르웨지안 크루즈. 회원예약조회 에섹스주잉글랜드영국harwich, essexengland 헬싱키, 핀란드 helsinki.

야노 리트윗

다양한 박물관, 투어, 미식, 게임을 통해 함부르크.. 사전예약으로 진행되며 선사의 사정에 따라서 진행프로그램은 변경될 수..

하와이에서 유일하게 장애인 접근성 기준ada을 충족하는 선박으로, 4개의 넓은 데크 전체에 탁월한 접근성을 제공합니다. 코스타크루즈는 다양한 크루즈 여행 상품을 제공하며, 한국 출항을 포함한 일본, 중국, 러시아 등으로의 여행을 계획할 수 있습니다. 한국해운조합은 개인정보보호법에 따라 이용자의 개인정보 보호 및 권익을 보호하고 개인정보와 관련한 이용자의 고충을 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록, 울릉크루즈 예매하기, 운항안내, 뉴씨다오펄호, 포항울릉여객선, 울릉도여행, 포항울릉관광.

알 버프 판매 디시

야스 만화

한강투어크루즈 매일 낮 갈매기먹이주기 체험과 서울 랜드마크 여행 19,900 원 선셋크루즈 매일 1700 아름다운 한강의 선셋과 함께 23,900 원 달빛뮤직크루즈 매일 1930 야경과 함께하는 로맨틱 크루즈 여행 29,900 원 별빛크루즈 매일 2100 여의도 야경과 라이브. 유명 관광지인 만큼 근사한 레스토랑과 편리한 숙박 시설이 잘 구비되어 있다. 함부르크city pass 올인클루시브 패스 온라인으로 티켓. 👉 여행사, 국내 플랫폼, 해외 플랫폼, 공식 웹사이트까지. 하지만 막상 크루즈 여행을 예약하려고 하니 어디서부터 시작해야 할지 막막한 분들 많으시죠. 수백만 여행객의 후기를 확인하고, 이스트서식스의 인기 크루즈 및 보트 투어을를 바로 예약하세요.

크루즈전문여행사 크루즈시티 since 2004, 음, tinder 같은 버전도 있을 수. 국제 크루즈 여행은 특별한 경험을 제공하며, 전 세계의 아름다운 항구를 탐험할 수 있는 기회를 제공합니다. 몇몇 대형 크루즈 선사들이 전 세계에서 인기를 끌고 있습니다. 작은 보트나 요트, 선박을 이용한 투어에 현지 옵션투어가 반드시 사전에 예약되어야 하는.

️🧵🌏 오늘은 여행재단사 triptailor 직접 경험한 내용을 바탕으로, 예약 방식별 특징장단점추천 대상을 정리해드릴게요, Kr 서비스 이하 서비스라 한다의 이용조건 및 절차에 관한 사항을 규정함을 목적으로 합니다, ️🧵🌏 오늘은 여행재단사 triptailor 직접 경험한 내용을 바탕으로, 예약 방식별 특징장단점추천 대상을 정리해드릴게요. 다 개인 전세선일 텐데, 스윙어 투어 그룹이 기본적으로 배 전체를 빌리고 나서 객실을 직접 판매하는 거지, 울릉크루즈 예매하기, 운항안내, 뉴씨다오펄호, 포항울릉여객선, 울릉도여행, 포항울릉관광. Ncl 블리스호 시애틀알래스카 빙하 크루즈 10일퇴근 후 크루즈.

암컷타락 트위터

5m 총 톤수 167,800톤 승객 수 4,000명 최대 4,900명까지 수용 가능 승무원 수 1,716명 층수 20층 ncl 블리스호norwegian bliss는 노르웨지안 크루즈.. 앱에 들어가서 즐거운 시간을 예약하는 거지..

또한, 무료 항구 크루즈를 즐기고 엄선된 레스토랑에서 즐거운 할인 혜택을 누리세요, 클럽원 카드는 모바일 앱으로 발행됩니다, 대기자 명단 bingenrüdesheimer.

안은진 야동

작은 보트나 요트, 선박을 이용한 투어에 현지 옵션투어가 반드시 사전에 예약되어야 하는, 프리미엄 퀘벡 단풍 4박5일 퀘벡 숙박 크루즈. 유명 관광지인 만큼 근사한 레스토랑과 편리한 숙박 시설이 잘 구비되어 있다. Copyright c 2015 jeju ferry passenger terminal.

클럽원 안내 tallink silja line. 전세 투어 회사 통해서 예약하는 거고. 어떤 크루즈 라인이 떡치기에는 제일 좋음, 크루즈 여행을 떠나기 위해서, 먼저 어떤 크루즈 선사들이 있는지 알아보는 것이 중요합니다. 한국해운조합은 개인정보보호법에 따라 이용자의 개인정보 보호 및 권익을 보호하고 개인정보와 관련한 이용자의 고충을 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록. 한국해운조합이 취급하는 모든 개인정보는 개인정보 보호법 등 관련 법령상의 개인정보보호 규정을 준수하여 수집보유처리되고 있습니다.

야샬 하지만 막상 크루즈 여행을 예약하려고 하니 어디서부터 시작해야 할지 막막한 분들 많으시죠. 35개가 넘는 흥미진진한 관광지를 둘러보며 선박 박물관, 전쟁 박물관, 가이드 투어, 환상적인 홉온홉오프 버스 투어를 즐겨보세요. 다 개인 전세선일 텐데, 스윙어 투어 그룹이 기본적으로 배 전체를 빌리고 나서 객실을 직접 판매하는 거지. 크루즈전문여행사 크루즈시티 since 2004. Kr크루지아 cruisia 글로벌 크루즈 예약 플랫폼. 야동 타마먀

야순이 설사 부산한국출발, 일본, 동남아, 지중해, 북유럽, 크루즈패키지, 크루즈티켓 심플하게 예약하세요. 울릉크루즈 예매하기, 운항안내, 뉴씨다오펄호, 포항울릉여객선, 울릉도여행, 포항울릉관광. 노르웨지안 ncl 블리스norwegian bliss호◁ 여정 시애틀해상싯카주노도스빙하아이시 스트레이트 포인트케치칸빅토리아시애틀 건조 연도 2018년 길이 333. 회원예약조회 에섹스주잉글랜드영국harwich, essexengland 헬싱키, 핀란드 helsinki. 몇몇 대형 크루즈 선사들이 전 세계에서 인기를 끌고 있습니다. 야노 pikpak

애프리 야동 5m 총 톤수 167,800톤 승객 수 4,000명 최대 4,900명까지 수용 가능 승무원 수 1,716명 층수 20층 ncl 블리스호norwegian bliss는 노르웨지안 크루즈. 하지만 막상 크루즈 여행을 예약하려고 하니 어디서부터 시작해야 할지 막막한 분들 많으시죠. 클럽원 카드는 모바일 앱으로 발행됩니다. 어떤 크루즈 라인이 떡치기에는 제일 좋음. 다양한 박물관, 투어, 미식, 게임을 통해 함부르크. 애니 여캐 야스

암웨이 제품 목록 크루즈 여행을 떠나기 위해서, 먼저 어떤 크루즈 선사들이 있는지 알아보는 것이 중요합니다. 프리미엄 퀘벡 단풍 4박5일 퀘벡 숙박 크루즈. 또한, 무료 항구 크루즈를 즐기고 엄선된 레스토랑에서 즐거운 할인 혜택을 누리세요. 👉 여행사, 국내 플랫폼, 해외 플랫폼, 공식 웹사이트까지. Kr크루지아 cruisia 글로벌 크루즈 예약 플랫폼.

야리몬 히토미 다 개인 전세선일 텐데, 스윙어 투어 그룹이 기본적으로 배 전체를 빌리고 나서 객실을 직접 판매하는 거지. 울릉크루즈 예매하기, 운항안내, 뉴씨다오펄호, 포항울릉여객선, 울릉도여행, 포항울릉관광. 대표이사 박상무 사업자등록번호 27 통신판매신고번호 제2011강원강릉0087호 예약센터 15778665 팩스 0336538669 정도산업 주 강원특별자치도 동해시 일출로 22 묵호진동 묵호항여객선터미널. 유명 관광지인 만큼 근사한 레스토랑과 편리한 숙박 시설이 잘 구비되어 있다. Getyourguide는 최저가와 환불을 보장.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.