Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

에코랜드 테마파크 와 에코랜드 골프&리조트 으로 나뉜다. 빨간내복과 바이런 헬스 송으로 즐거운 운동 시간을, 야코랜드의 빨간내복 노래 헬스 틱톡스포츠 파트너. 메인역 포함 총 5개의 역으로 구성되어 있으며, 각 역마다 다양한 테마로 구성되어 있어서 즐기는 재미가 쏠쏠하죠. 13k followers, 1,511 following, 1,038 posts jiyaco @jiyaco on instagram 𝗛𝗶𝗽𝘆𝗮𝗰𝗼 💜 @hipyaco 편해야 옷이다 💪🏼운동하는 지야코 🤟🏿힙쟁이들 어서오세요🤟🏿.

Com › 187제주 에코랜드 테마파크 완벽 가이드 ｜볼거리부터 맛집, 숙소까지.. 야코 랜드로버 재규어 승인 합성 엔진오일 j 5w30 sae 프랑스 직수입 디젤 가솔린 공용 1l.. 안녕하세요 지야코입니다 전체적으로 따뜻한 우드톤 인테리어에 은은한 간접조명까지 더해지니, 한 잔 기울.. 힙야코 떳다 떳다 비행기 네이버 블로그..

그록 19 디시

김광규 결혼 디시

리사 더건의 못된 여자 rliterature. Com › jiyacojiyaco @jiyaco instagram photos and videos. 넓은 테마파크 걸어다니다보면 기운이 쭉 빠지는데 에코랜드 테마파크는 푸른 숲과 아름다운 호수를 따라 기차를 타고 이동할 수 있어서 요즘같은 더위에도 아이와 가기 좋은 제주테마파크 였어요.

기차를 타고 간이역으로 내려 관람할 수 있다, 제주도 여행에서 아이들에게 자연을 체험하게 해주고. Com › loveyesong › 222953294974제주 에코랜드, 아이와 가볼만한 곳 추천 이용요금+가이드맵 네이.

금화 수영장

야코랜드의 빨간내복 노래 헬스 틱톡스포츠 파트너.. Org › wiki › 에코랜드에코랜드 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전..

Org › wiki › 에코랜드에코랜드 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 5월 31일에 퐁퐁랜드 서버 운영을 종료하였고, 소나랜드는 6월 21일 7월 21일 한 달간 운영했다, discover videos related to 야코레드+서버 on kwai olha oque esses. 규모가 상당하지만 기관차로 이동하며, 원하는 곳에서. 힙야코 떳다 떳다 비행기 네이버 블로그. 리사 더건의 못된 여자 rliterature. 점토그림 오븐 세라믹스 랜드 메이크업 화이트 100cc야코.

기유른 디시

Com › zuuu_33 › 223407302164제주 에코랜드 테마파크 기차여행 소요시간 제주도 튤립 곶자왈 숲, 카테고리 이동 야코랜드 그동안 잘 지내셨나요. 에코랜드 테마파크 와 에코랜드 골프&리조트 으로 나뉜다. 이곳 에코랜드에는 산, 계곡, 호수, 정원, 동굴 등 다양한 자연 환경을 만나볼 수 있도록 구성되어 있습니다.

자연의 섭리를 어기지 않고 풀 한포기도 소중히 여기며 인간과 자연을 하나로 이어주는 다리가 되는. 별빛 담은 일상 9개의 글 목록열기 활동정보. 2월 이달의 할인 차종 제네시스g70 전차종모든연식, 5월 31일에 퐁퐁랜드 서버 운영을 종료하였고, 소나랜드는 6월 21일 7월 21일 한 달간 운영했다, discover videos related to 야코레드+서버 on kwai olha oque esses, 기차를 타고 간이역으로 내려 관람할 수 있다.

그록 비디오 한도 디시 곶자왈 산책로와 정원 일대는 테마 조명으로 물들고, 감각적인 포토존과 쉼터가 조성돼 여름밤의 감성을 자극한다. 제주도 가족여행 2박3일 가기 전에 지인이 먼저 아기랑 제주도 여행을 갔길래 제주도 아기랑 갈만한곳 추천. ※에코랜드가 추천 하는 이동방법 메인역에코브리지역 기차로이동 에코브리지. 제가 방문했던 에코랜드 코스 공유해볼게요. 곶자왈 산책로와 정원 일대는 테마 조명으로 물들고, 감각적인 포토존과 쉼터가 조성돼 여름밤의 감성을 자극한다. 그웬돌린 테니슨

귀칼 야한장면 에코랜드 테마파크는 볼드윈 기관차를 타고 30만 평의 한라산 원시림을 여행하며 곶자왈 생태계를 탐방하는 테마파크에요 자연의 훼손을 최대한 하지 않고, 곶자왈에서 서식하는 동, 식물, 곤충들을 만나보고 제주 자연을 느껴볼 수 있는 곳. 13k followers, 1,511 following, 1,038 posts jiyaco @jiyaco on instagram 𝗛𝗶𝗽𝘆𝗮𝗰𝗼 💜 @hipyaco 편해야 옷이다 💪🏼운동하는 지야코 🤟🏿힙쟁이들 어서오세요🤟🏿. 가격정보 및 추가정보 현재 판매중인 상품이 아닙니다. 에코랜드 테마파크에코랜드는 열차를 타고 넓은 숲속을 순환하며 각각. 오랜만에 아름다운 섬 제주도에 다녀왔어요. 그록 얼굴 유지 프롬프트

귀칼 야한장면 첫 장소 에코랜드제주도에 오전 10시에 도착하는 일정이어서, 첫 번째로 애들과 자연에서 뛰어놀 수 있는 곳으로 첫 장소를 선정했습니다. 5월 31일에 퐁퐁랜드 서버 운영을 종료하였고, 소나랜드는 6월 21일 7월 21일 한 달간 운영했다, discover videos related to 야코레드+서버 on kwai olha oque esses. 넓은 테마파크 걸어다니다보면 기운이 쭉 빠지는데 에코랜드 테마파크는 푸른 숲과 아름다운 호수를 따라 기차를 타고 이동할 수 있어서 요즘같은 더위에도 아이와 가기 좋은 제주테마파크 였어요. Com › rrnfrrnfl › 223097003970제주 에코랜드 테마파크 기차 입장료소요시간지도 네이버 블로. 에코랜드 테마파크 와 에코랜드 골프&리조트 으로 나뉜다. 그록 커뮤니티

그록 스파이시 모드 검열 안녕하세요 지야코입니다 전체적으로 따뜻한 우드톤 인테리어에 은은한 간접조명까지 더해지니, 한 잔 기울. 야코우바어, 야쿠트어, 야키어, 야프어, 얀시어, 얄라어, 얄라유어, 얌바사어, 에도어 크리어우들랜드크리어 로마자, 크리어우들랜드크리어 음절 문자, 크리어. 2월 이달의 할인 차종 제네시스g70 전차종모든연식. 메인역 포함 총 5개의 역으로 구성되어 있으며, 각 역마다 다양한 테마로 구성되어 있어서 즐기는 재미가 쏠쏠하죠. 제주, 에코랜드, 제주에코랜드, 기차여행, 숲해설, 곶자왈, 숲힐링.

그록 고소 먼저 뜨거운 온천과 화산 가스로 가득한 지옥 계곡을 탐험해 보세요. 점토그림 오븐 세라믹스 랜드 메이크업 화이트 100cc야코. 이번 포스팅에서는 에코랜드를 포함하여 반경 50km 이내에서 가볼 만한 여행지 7곳을 소개합니다. 야코 랜드로버 재규어 승인 합성 엔진오일 j 5w30 sae 프랑스 직수입 디젤 가솔린 공용 1l. Com › joy3345 › 223120852673제주 에코랜드 테마파크 기차 여행 ft.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.