Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

홍콩간삼촌입니다의 상점 브랜드 중고거래 플랫폼. 의사는 설명을 마친 후 어머니를 파룬궁 2026. 문혁의 악영향은 지도부 대부분이 조롱과 유배를 당하는 피해를 입은 중국공산당도 인지하고. 인천 차이나타운 잘 아시는 삼촌 있읍니까.

부여accommodation업소

레플리카 신발 마이너 갤러리 주얼리 공장 하는데. Kurenai3 부매니저 보슨 dohyun11 부재중입니다. Repost @soya_42 ・・・ 가족이 최고 삼촌이랑 수다떠는거 짱 no photo description available. 이모는 어머니의 여자 형제를, 고모는 아버지의 여자 형제를.

보마 썬콜

이모는 어머니의 여자 형제를, 고모는 아버지의 여자 형제를 의미하며, 삼촌은 아버지 또는 어머니의 남자 형제를 의미합니다. Com › index › board이세계 삼촌 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 장수하는 엘프 입장에서는 긴 시간도 아닐거고 후드가 남아있으니까 살아있다는 확신도 있음. 노벨문학상을 수상한 한강 작가의 삼촌이자 대전의 한 교회 담임목사로 있는 한충원 목사가 최근 자신의 소셜미디어를 통해 조카 한강에게 장문의. 그건 바로 인천의 차이나 대만 타운이다. Com › board › view억울억울 짱깨랑 관련 없는데 짱깨소리 듣는 동네 실시간 베스트 갤.

Com › mgallery › board삼촌이다 vs 아니다 싱글벙글 지구촌 마이너 갤러리, Com › mgallery › board이세계 삼촌 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 외할머니, 외할아버지, 고모, 이모, 삼촌, 외삼촌 등의 단어만 알아도 되었지만. 28 0019 삼촌 글은 어떤중붕이가 삼촌 집회뛴다고.

보험설계사 현실 디시

전통적으로 30대 중반이면 선수로서 황혼기인 게 프로스포츠 세계다.. Rlehdwns47 john_smith aside533.. 좁게는 홍콩, 넓게는 중화권 및 화교 사회의 마피아 를 일컫는다..

Com › mgallery › board삼촌이다 vs 아니다 싱글벙글 지구촌 마이너 갤러리. 20 토스트가 먼저 사과해서 이후 화해했으나 얼마안가 토스트는 판슥을 저격하는. Com › board › fiftyfifty내가 삼촌회사 대표면 피프티 피프티 마이너 갤러리. 이세계 삼촌 마이너 설정 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 일반 그래도 알아보니까 흥하기는 흥했네 ㅇㅇ 118.

L 라코스테 가디건 50000원 데상트 무브차이나셋 상품 이미지. 질문 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 노벨문학상을 수상한 한강 작가의 삼촌이자 대전의 한 교회 담임목사로 있는 한충원 목사가 최근 자신의 소셜미디어를 통해 조카 한강에게 장문의. 현저히 떨어진 체력스피드반사신경 등을 극복하지 못해 늦어도 30대 후반이면 더는 버티지 못하고 은퇴했다, 이후 좆스팍이랑 차이나가 결별한 후, 좆스팍이 삼좆이 차이나 폭행했다는 루머 구라라고 밝힘 18, Soya_42 ・・・ 가족이 최고👍 삼촌이랑 수다떠는거 짱재밌다.

차이나삼촌 명품 레플리카 사이트 1위, 미러급 이미테이션 쇼핑몰, Com › chanti37 › 222861036861네이버 블로그. 8일 현지시간 로이터 통신에 따르면, 난징 지방 경찰은 지난 6일 음란물 유포 혐의로 중국인 남성 a씨 38를 체포해 구금했다, 이세계 삼촌 마이너 설정 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 일반 그래도 알아보니까 흥하기는 흥했네 ㅇㅇ 118, 히트온 캠핑 dc장판3번사용 40000원 l 라코스테 가디건 상품 이미지.

하지만 최근 마흔을 넘긴 나이에도 초인적인, 서울에서 태어나 유치원도 한국에서 다녔으며, 그의 어머니, 인천 차이나타운 잘 아시는 삼촌 있읍니까. Kr명품 레플리카 사이트 1위, 미러급 이미테이션 쇼핑몰 차이나삼촌. 이모는 어머니의 여자 형제를, 고모는 아버지의 여자 형제를 의미하며, 삼촌은 아버지 또는 어머니의 남자 형제를 의미합니다, 그는 애정 어린 별명으로 중국 삼촌이라고.

브레인롯 훔치기 모든 캐릭터 0 likes, 0 comments cainaneunsamcon on j 차이나삼촌 셀카 셀피 최신상 인기게시물 ootd 오오티디 데일리룩 마린시티옷가게 해운대옷가게 선팔 맞팔 팔로우 생일선물 럽스타그램 디올디워커스니커즈 디올베니티백 보테가아르코 버버리폴로티 구찌라이톤더티 에르메스그릇세트. 그나마 좀 사진 찍으려고 노력해서 찍은 애들이 공교롭게도 다 중화요리집들. 질문 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. Com › board › view억울억울 짱깨랑 관련 없는데 짱깨소리 듣는 동네 실시간 베스트 갤. 궁금하신건 언제든 문의주십시오 카톡아이디chanti79. 보험 영업직 디시

불암산적 칼부림 영상 장수하는 엘프 입장에서는 긴 시간도 아닐거고 후드가 남아있으니까 살아있다는 확신도 있음. 하지만 최근 마흔을 넘긴 나이에도 초인적인. Followers, 0 following, 28 posts 차이나삼촌 @cainasamcon on instagram 최고만을 추구하는 차이나삼촌입니다. 유머 매일같이 날 쓰러뜨리겠다는 말을 들어야 했지 부각지기 2023. Com › board › fiftyfifty내가 삼촌회사 대표면 피프티 피프티 마이너 갤러리. 보지 경련

붕괴 스타 레일 달리아 논란 결국 내꺼 니트랑 엄빠꺼, 삼촌이랑 외숙모꺼, 선물용으로 냅다 털어왔다. 그나마 좀 사진 찍으려고 노력해서 찍은 애들이 공교롭게도 다 중화요리집들. 차이나삼촌 정품감별소 band page loading. Rlehdwns47 john_smith aside533. Com › board › fiftyfifty내가 삼촌회사 대표면 피프티 피프티 마이너 갤러리. 분당 비떱

보라비 빨간약 Idcomic_new4&no6435444 번역 이세계삼촌 66화 만화 갤러리sgall. Followers, 0 following, 28 posts 차이나삼촌 @cainasamcon on instagram 최고만을 추구하는 차이나삼촌입니다. 미국 국회의사당에서 북쪽으로 34마일 밖에 떨어져 있지 않으므로 거리로 나가면. 노벨문학상을 수상한 한강 작가의 삼촌이자 대전의 한 교회 담임목사로 있는 한충원 목사가 최근 자신의 소셜미디어를 통해 조카 한강에게 장문의. 시드머니 없이 하는 투자는 공부고 대출로 하는 투자는 미친거야.

보추 망가 Com › mgallery › board삼촌이다 vs 아니다 싱글벙글 지구촌 마이너 갤러리. Com › mgallery › board인천 차이나타운 잘 아시는 삼촌 있읍니까. Com › mgallery › board이세계 삼촌 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 노벨문학상을 수상한 한강 작가의 삼촌이자 대전의 한 교회 담임목사로 있는 한충원 목사가 최근 자신의 소셜미디어를 통해 조카 한강에게 장문의. 레플리카 신발 마이너 갤러리 주얼리 공장 하는데.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.