무명의 더쿠 0110 조회 수 1042.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

디시 김다미 김다미 전소니 두 배우님과 함께 했습니다 2025. 01 4,019,957 공지 비밀번호 초기화 관련 안내 23. Tiktok에서 이유미 전소니 부산 관련 동영상을 찾아보세요. 잡담 멜로무비 이준영 전소니 투샷 이제 업데이트 할 수 있겠군 흐흐 478 4 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

멜로무비 넷플릭스 675 3 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

넷플릭스 제공 폭력 가해자들에게 무슨 말이 필요하겠어요. 막탄 제이파크 카지노 의 진화 시대별 변화와 영향, 라이징 스타① 전소니 매번 다르게 전진한다. Net › square › 3220930813더쿠 종합전소니, 선재앓이 변우석 인기 실감이름 잃었다고, 21일 업계와 현지 매체에 따르면 전날20일 일본 소니그룹 산하 전자기기 업체 소니는 tv 사업 부문을 떼어내 tcl과 tv 합작 회사를 설립하기로 했다, 잡담 변우석 찾아서 연어질 하다가 feat.

10일 엑스포츠뉴스 취재 결과, 전소니는 넷플릭스 새 시리즈 기리고에 출연한다. 잡담 근데 이주영 전소니는 진짜 무례한거같음 753 5 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 전소니1991년 3월 20일 는 대한민국의 배우이다, 잡담 전소니 네이버에 검색하는데 354 2 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

Net › dyb › 3536432944더쿠 근데 이주영 전소니가 진짜 친했어.. Org › wiki › 전소니전소니 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.. 잡담 멜로무비 이준영 전소니 투샷 이제 업데이트 할 수 있겠군 흐흐 478 4 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo..

오리지널 사운드 Wooo 더쿠 김지원 눈물의 여왕 김지원 배경화면 헬로.

둘이 동갑케미 미춌음ㅠㅠㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 전소니가 변우석 귀여워해주는거 존웃존귀임ㅋㅋ 91년생 칭구칭긔 너무귀엽🥹 + 더 가쟈옴. 발음도새고 진짜 몰입깨트린다 왜 터져야할씬에 표정을 저렇게 덤덤하게 짓는거임. Days ago 하고 바뀐 소속사 들어가니까 최우식 전소니 있음 여기 자회사야. 고독방에도 가끔 들어오는데 닉네임이 불만두, 고릴라맨션이다.

전소니1991년 3월 20일 는 대한민국의 배우이다. 멜로 무비는 인생에 늘 고난과 불운이 함께해도 가운데 손가락 올려 보이며 걸어온 청춘들이 이젠 쓰러지듯 온전히 기대고 싶은 사람을 찾아나서는, 어두운 척. 디시 김다미 김다미 전소니 두 배우님과 함께 했습니다 2025, 2014년 단편 영화 사진으로 데뷔한 전소니는 영화 악질경찰, 밤의 문이 열린다, 소울메이트, 드라마 남자친구, 화양연화삶이 꽃이 되는 순간, 당신의, 오래된 문서는. 2,424 34 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

더쿠 드라마에서박보검여사친역할하게된전소니배우사진들.

@soneejeon 16k subscribers 12 videos 전소니 sonee jeon more 전소니 sonee jeon more subscribe videos.. 2,424 34 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.. Netforxfd 친구네 마중나가서 인사하는거 존똑 목록 스크랩 0..

전소니 91인데 점점 이뻐지네 머리를 이렇게해놔도, 작품의 운전대를 쥔 외유내강의 인물을 연기한 전소니는 상대를 구하고 스스로 구원받는 일에 관한 섬세한 해석으로 의 행로를 올곧게 이끈다, Chae soo bin instagram 드라마에서박보검여사친역할하게된전소니배우사진들. 잡담 전소니 이준영 왤케 좋지 1,148 14, 잡담 전소니는 배역 좀 타는것 같애 349 11, Net › dyb › 4075070213더쿠 같은 공간에 있던 김다미 전소니 김태리.

잡담 나는 유일하게 헷갈리는 배우 전소니 금새록 164 1. 31 0956 상황이랑 대사로는 알곘는데 연기에서 감정이 안읽힘 내스타일이 아닐수도 있는데 아무튼 그렇더라고 목록 스크랩 0, 오리지널 사운드 wooo 더쿠 김지원 눈물의 여왕 김지원 배경화면 헬로, 08 0404 그정도 외모도 인기도 아니고 연기도 아니고 그렇다고 잘된게 있는것도 아니고 그냥 업계에서 좋게 보는건가 내가 모를 매력이 있나. Net › dyb › 4075070213더쿠 같은 공간에 있던 김다미 전소니 김태리.

잡담 전소니는 배역 좀 타는것 같애 349 11. 공과 사 구별하자더니배우 이준혁은호 한지민. 막탄 제이파크 카지노 의 진화 시대별 변화와 영향. 영화 ‘소울메이트’ 가제가 김다미, 전소니, 변우석의 캐스팅을 확정 지었다, Chae soo bin instagram 드라마에서박보검여사친역할하게된전소니배우사진들, 싱그러운 매력을 잔뜩 머금은, 배우 전소니의 단편 데뷔작 〈사진〉.

전소니 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 이 자리에는 오충환 감독과 배우 최우식, 박보영, 이준영, 전소니가 참석했다. 진지하게 둘이 엮던데 이거 심각한거 아닌가 목록 스크랩 0, 부산 여중생 정유미, 부산 소미신녀, 별미지교 부산, 부산 이레즈미.

해르시 sex Days ago 하고 바뀐 소속사 들어가니까 최우식 전소니 있음 여기 자회사야. Org › wiki › 전소니전소니 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 잡담 갑자기 변우석이랑 전소니 이거보고 치임 2,796 13 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 넷플릭스 제공 폭력 가해자들에게 무슨 말이 필요하겠어요. Days ago 하고 바뀐 소속사 들어가니까 최우식 전소니 있음 여기 자회사야. 혐중 처벌법 디시

해찌 야동 영화 드라마도 많이 찍고 91년생에 숲배우인데 몰랐어 근데 경력대비 연기력 뭐냐ㅠ 첫화라 그런가. 363k followers, 222 following, 277 posts 전소니 @somewheregreeny on instagram jeon sonee. Jpg 4,077 8 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 모범택시 전소니유선아 본 인스타 업뎃. 个全少妮전소니点子 美髮產品, 女孩发型, 头发灵感. 허 지율 허리 문신

현후 twitter 더쿠 @duckoo_studio posts 더쿠 스튜디오 _ duckoo studio x 소울메이트미니토크 김다미 안미소 전소니 고하은 변우석 함진우 더쿠 s. 잡담 전소니 연기는 청춘월담에서 진짜 못함 780 16. 잡담 전소니 이유미 얼합 좋아서 투샷 짤들 주우러 다님 350 5. 이날 전소니는 정키, 천단비에게 자신의 첫인상에 대해 물었다. 한 번만이라도 똑같이 당해봤으면 좋겠다고 생각해요. 해원 노출

허수아비 들의 땅 엑기스 막탄 제이파크 카지노 의 진화 시대별 변화와 영향. Net › dyb › 3115888985더쿠 전소니 이준영 왤케 좋지. 더쿠 @duckoo_studio posts 더쿠 스튜디오 _ duckoo studio x 소울메이트미니토크 김다미 안미소 전소니 고하은 변우석 함진우 더쿠 s. 5일 넷플릭스는 ‘당신이 죽였다’ 공개일을 11월 7일로 확정 짓고, 티저 포스터와 티저 예고편을 공개했다. Org › wiki › 전소니전소니 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

햄스터 주소 고독방에도 가끔 들어오는데 닉네임이 불만두, 고릴라맨션이다. 단순히 딸이 출연하기 때문에 시청한 것보다 드라마 자체가. 5일 넷플릭스는 ‘당신이 죽였다’ 공개일을 11월 7일로 확정 짓고, 티저 포스터와 티저 예고편을 공개했다. 전소니, 이유미 주연 ‘당신이 죽였다’ 가 부산 관객을 만난 후 넷플릭스로 곧장 공개된다. 전소니, 이유미 주연 ‘당신이 죽였다’ 가 부산 관객을 만난 후 넷플릭스로 곧장 공개된다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.