Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Cuba 쿠바 is previously named as black, however, they changed their name and location amid of covid19 pandemic. 내가 여기서 쿠바 후기 보면서 느낀건데, 살짝 msg가 쳐져있음나도 테매 나나플라자 소이카우보이 워킹 가봤고, 폴란드 오들로티로 프라이빗, 체코 업소 가봤는데 외모랑 몸매는 태국보다 당연 높지만 미녀들의 천국은 절대. 쿠바 의 52개가 넘는 사우나 보유 호텔을 저렴한 가격에 선택, 예약하세요. 아바나를 친구와 3박4일 여행하며 느낀 주의사항과 많이들 궁금해하는 숙소&와이파이.

더글로리 좌표

Loft havana spa cuba jacuzzi sauna bar à cocktails.. 쿠바 사우나가 있는 호텔 인기가 높은쿠바 사우나가 있는 호텔에 대한 160,148건의 여행자 리뷰와 생생한 사진을 트립어드바이저에서 확인해보세요.. 쿠바 사우나가 있는 호텔 인기가 높은쿠바 사우나가 있는 호텔에 대한 160,148건의 여행자 리뷰와 생생한 사진을 트립어드바이저에서 확인해보세요.. 서울 소재 게이사우나 알려줌 ㅇㅇ223..

니콜라스 고다드

누루마유 Mis

쿠바의 사우나 보유 호텔을 찾고 계세요, 2025년의 첫 쿠바 여행은 과 함께 했다. 토론토에서 밤 비행기로 도착한 쿠바, 하바나. —————————————————————— 가격은 띠목에.

니지산지 빨간약 모음

처음 쿠바 여행을 준비하면서 이상할 정도로 다른나라와 달리 도움이 될만한 정보가 부족하고 특히 전체적인 계획을 잡기에 도움이. 전체적으로 물이 좋으나 끼순이가 씨끄럽게 떠들거나 하는 소리가 너무 격렬해서 잠자는건 포기해야함, 항상 일상으로부터의 탈출을 꿈꾸지만 그 일상이 주는 진부함과. Kr › destinationsincubahotels쿠바의 사우나 보유 호텔 수많은 사우나 보유 호텔에서 선택, 예약하. 공산국가이자 그간 서구에 개방되지 않은데서 오는 신비로움, 중남미 국가 중에 안전한 편에 속하는 치안, 예쁜 카리브해의 바다, 음악만 나오면 길거리가 클럽이 되는 흥이 넘치는 사람들, 상대적인 인터넷 등의 불편함으로 인해 남아있는 아날로그 감성의 존재. Blau varadero 사우나 사진 및 리뷰.

호텔스는 10만원이길래 호텔스로 예약했고 내일 타고갈 버스는 25쿡주고 바로 예약했음. 트리니다드나 바라데로 등이 인클루시브 호텔 숙박, 식사, 액티비티 총 제공과 휴양으로 유명하다고 했는데, 이미 라스베가스랑 칸쿤에서 잠깐씩 있었던 터라 별로 생각도없었고. Cuba 쿠바 is previously named as black, however, they changed their name and location amid of covid19 pandemic.

단체 히토미

시선 강탈 당할까 봐 무서운 것들 ㅎㅎ 쿠바에서는 전혀. 쿠바 의 52개가 넘는 사우나 보유 호텔을 저렴한 가격에 선택, 예약하세요, 쿠바 의 52개가 넘는 사우나 보유 호텔을 저렴한 가격에 선택, 예약하세요, 밤엔 거리가 깜깜해 잘 보이지 않았었는데 아침에 일어나보니 내가 생각한 쿠바와 다른 풍경에 조금 놀랐다. 쿠바, 아제르바이잔의 사우나가 있는 호텔.

한 달 평균 월급이 30불이라는 쿠바 사람들에게 자동차는 엄청난 사치품이다. 본 포스팅에 기록된 정보는 2022년 6월 기준이니 참고. 오아시스 사우나와 자쿠지, 웰빙과 자연.

다 받아주는 콜센터 Loft havana spa cuba jacuzzi sauna bar à cocktails. 띠목에 해피사우나 쿠바오에 있는 해피사우나를 아시나요. Kr › destinationsincubahotels쿠바의 사우나 보유 호텔 수많은 사우나 보유 호텔에서 선택, 예약하. 제가 가고 싶었던 나라는 인터넷도 잘 안되고 혼자 떠나기엔 조금 무서웠던 중미ㅋㅋㅋ 바로 쿠바였습니다ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그래서 오늘은 여자 혼자 떠났던 쿠바여행, 인터넷이 잘 안되도 잘 놀았던 후기 공유하도록 하겠습니닷. 한 달 평균 월급이 30불이라는 쿠바 사람들에게 자동차는 엄청난 사치품이다. 댄스팀 유두

대학교 댄스동아리 유두노출 쿠바, 아제르바이잔의 사우나가 있는 호텔. Cuba is well located in the heart of gangnam district, and easily accessible both by bus and by subway exit 3 of sinnonhyeon station subway line 9shinbundang, and also walking distance from gangnam station line 2, and. 지난 2월 21일 인천공항을 출발해 토론토 1박. 토론토에서 밤 비행기로 도착한 쿠바, 하바나. 토론토에서 밤 비행기로 도착한 쿠바, 하바나. 더 파이팅 최신

닝닝 가슴골 띠목에 해피사우나 쿠바오에 있는 해피사우나를 아시나요. 내가 여기서 쿠바 후기 보면서 느낀건데, 살짝 msg가 쳐져있음 나도 테매 나나플라자 소이카우보이 워킹 가봤고, 폴란드 오들로티로 프라이빗, 체코 업소 가봤는데 외모랑 몸매는 태국보다 당연 높지만 미녀들의 천국. 본 포스팅에 기록된 정보는 2022년 6월 기준이니 참고. 2025년의 첫 쿠바 여행은 과 함께 했다. 여행 러버 블로거로써 가만히 있을 수 없쟈냐. 누키타시 영어로

다누리 근황 디시 쿠바 도착한 건 작년 11월 초였고 10일 정도 있었음. 24시간 사우나가 주는 기쁨도 빼놓을 수 없다. 쿠바 도착한 건 작년 11월 초였고 10일 정도 있었음. 7 월바라데로 앞 포스팅에서 이어집니다. 바라데로, 쿠바에 있는 blau varadero 사우나의 사진 및 리뷰를 확인하세요.

느와르 kemono 바라데로, 쿠바에 있는 blau varadero 사우나의 사진 및 리뷰를 확인하세요. 한 달 평균 월급이 30불이라는 쿠바 사람들에게 자동차는 엄청난 사치품이다. 쿠바 여름네일 파인애플네일 신논현네일 신논현네일샵 신 개막 코앞인데 101 현대 사우나 신논현 쿠바 충격방문후기실제 캡처위치총정리 페르소나10 mai 2025 12시30분. 여행 러버 블로거로써 가만히 있을 수 없쟈냐. 처음 쿠바 여행을 준비하면서 이상할 정도로 다른나라와 달리 도움이 될만한 정보가 부족하고 특히 전체적인 계획을 잡기에 도움이.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.