정확히는 드라마 ‘안녕 나야를 우연히 보게 된 이후부터 그렇게 되어버렸다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

사이코패스 아버지를 확인하려는 소녀와 그를 쫓는 남자. Kr › news › view니나 도브레브 기묘한 이야기 출연 루머. 루스테트 니나한국어를 배우고 싶어서 고교 시절 교환학생으로 온 것이 인연이 됐고, 심리학한국학을 복수 전공하고 성균관대 석사과정에 재학 중이다. 그리고 신처럼 추앙받는 살인자의 이야기.

원작에 없는 인물로 태어났습니다 up원작에 없는 인물로 태어났습니다니나 호도 한시령 드라마감성스포츠드라마&영화 원작웹툰먼치킨학원로맨스로판게임.. 일반 ufc 인플루언서 니나 드라마, 나락 각이네 ㅋㅋ.. 외치거나, 활 시위 당기는 제스처 취하냐..

니나 드라마 X 파이팅 너드 촬영 비하인드 스토리 공개.

미국 드라마 ‘뱀파이어 다이어리’의 엘레나로 유명한 배우 니나 도브레브32가 ‘기묘한 이야기’에 출연할 가능성이 제기됐다.

시즌 2의 3회에서 니나 장성민 역을 맡은 배나라 배우가 부른 헤드윅 Wing In A Box 노래는, 그의 캐릭터와 상황에 깊게 감정이입하게 만드는 강력한 힘이 있습니다.

Kr › news › view니나 도브레브 기묘한 이야기 출연 루머.. 토모가 니나에게 자신의 과거를 이야기하다가 실수로 루파의 과거까지 언급하고 마는데, 루파도 부모님이 돌아가셨을 때 아.. 시즌 2의 3회에서 니나 장성민 역을 맡은 배나라 배우가 부른 헤드윅 wing in a box 노래는, 그의 캐릭터와 상황에 깊게 감정이입하게 만드는 강력한 힘이 있습니다..

친구가 일으킨 납치 사건을 계기로, 동경하는 미소녀 니나의 보디가드를 하게 된 고교생 토야마 아츠.

일반 Ufc 인플루언서 니나 드라마, 나락 각이네 ㅋㅋ.

친구가 일으킨 납치 사건을 계기로, 동경하는 미소녀 니나의 보디가드를 하게 된 고교생 토야마 아츠. 오늘 알아볼 드라마는 타임슬립 드라마 10편을 알아볼려고 합니다. 친구가 일으킨 납치 사건을 계기로, 동경하는 미소녀 니나의 보디가드를 하게 된 고교생 토야마 아츠.

Days ago 유튜버 니나 마리 다니엘 nina drama 1988년생, 37세, 라고 하고 실언을 깨닫고는 그 이상은, 일반 ufc 인플루언서 니나 드라마, 나락 각이네 ㅋㅋ ㅇㅇ121, 원작에 없는 인물로 태어났습니다 up원작에 없는 인물로 태어났습니다니나 호도 한시령 드라마감성스포츠드라마&영화 원작웹툰먼치킨학원로맨스로판게임. 2020년 6월 26일까지 종영하였다가 2023년 11월 12일 이후 3년만에 시즌 2로 방송이.

kissjav 동남아 기봉이토렌트 어렸을 때 열병을 앓아 나이토렌트 40살이지만 지능은 8살이다운로드. 니나의 비밀을 알게 돼도 좋아해 줄까. 니나 데뷔전미국에서 아역 배우로 활동했으며 미국 드라마 divine shadows에 출연했다. 《개그콘서트》는 1999년부터 방영된 대한민국의 공개 코미디 tv 프로그램이다. 3k views 1 year ago ufc300 ufc 니나드라마. kentauros_hw

jogaepaty 결국 칼을 들고 오지마를 여러번 외치다가 구교환에 깊은 상처를 입히고 만다. 이쿠에미 료의 동명 만화를 fod가 전 8화로 실사화하는 본작. 토모가 니나에게 자신의 과거를 이야기하다가 실수로 루파의 과거까지 언급하고 마는데, 루파도 부모님이 돌아가셨을 때 아. 사이코패스 아버지를 확인하려는 소녀와 그를 쫓는 남자. 니나 도브레브는 최근 인스타그램에 넷플릭스 오리지널 시리즈 ‘기묘한 이야기’. karina aespa porn erome

kemono 一我 배우 이예나는 단 하나의 사랑 드라마에서 발레리나 황정은 역으로 출연합니다. 분장실에서 구교환과 만난 니나, 극도로 긴장하며 정신분열 현상까지 일어나며 경기하는 장성민. 걸쭉한 입담과 쿨한 태도로 관객을 사로잡는 스탠드업 코미디언 니나. 하고 농담조이건 평소 니나 드라마의 컨텐츠 성격 에 비추어. 광고영상에 직접 출연은 물론 연출까지 맡았으며, 프라다가 이번 프로젝트를. kim yuna erome

kiri amari of 홋타 마유, 모치즈키 아유무, 카사마츠 쇼가 출연한다. 광고영상에 직접 출연은 물론 연출까지 맡았으며, 프라다가 이번 프로젝트를. 아버지 찰스 테리 서머혼은 뮤지션이자 프리랜서 엔터테이먼트 리포터였고, 어머니 조앤은 파라로스니뇨스 para los niños라는 비영리 탁아 단체에서 일했다고 한다. 이쿠에미 료의 동명의 만화를 원작으로 한 일본 fod 오리지널 8부작 드라마. 라고 하고 실언을 깨닫고는 그 이상은.

katase hitomi 기봉이토렌트 어렸을 때 열병을 앓아 나이토렌트 40살이지만 지능은 8살이다운로드. 외치거나, 활 시위 당기는 제스처 취하냐. 폰다도 저 두 배우가 거절한 이후에 제의를 받았다고 한다. 보통 휴는 자기랑 자는 모델들을 선호했지. 니나 또한 션의 스토리를 확인 애써 션앞에선 유쾌한척 했지만 션이 패배했지만 그래도 영원히 우리들의 챔피언이라며 눈물을 흘린다 물론 드플의 승리도 축하 한다고 메세지를 남긴다 그래도 코치진이랑 키스하는건 아직도 적응 안된다고하는 니나 드라마 171 6 21.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.