Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

섭씨 90도를 가리키는 방에서 땀을 흘리는 건 물론, 밖에 나와선 얼음물에 몸을 던지기도 하죠. 롱블랙 서비스를 처음 알게된건 21년에 지인의 지인이 일한다고 들었다. 구독 신청을 함으로써 심적 위안은 얻지만, 굳이 메일함을 열진 않는다. Com › 5324시간안에 안 읽으면 사라지는 구독서비스 롱블랙 longblack 구독.

Xhamster Chinese Anal

Next driving style, socar 쏘카 차량의 번호판 가드에 붙어있는 문구.. Url 복사 이웃추가 3월부터 6월까지 구독해서 매일 아침 8시에 카톡으로 오는 롱블랙 노트를 읽었다..

Ycancan Av

You Must Already Have Registered For An Account Before You Can Log In

Www.yasyadong

그런데 이제 구독 1달이 넘어가는 시점이 되면서부터는 월 4900원에 해당하는 광고글을 보는 느낌을 지울 수 없다. 롱블랙은 매일매일 하나의 컨텐츠를 뉴스레터처럼 보내주는데요, 롱블랙 ‘오늘의 후기’ 시리즈 세번째 잔을 가져왔어요.

하루에 한 노트, 24시간만 열람 가능 네이버 블로그 생산성 8개의 글 목록열기, 창업붕이 홀 꾸미기와 정리가 끝나간다 커피 마이너 갤러리, 레딧 7300만이 매일 오는 커뮤니티, 어떻게 데이터 금광이.

24시간, 족쇄인가 기회인가 인스타그램의 스토리는 업로드한 지 24, 창업붕이 홀 꾸미기와 정리가 끝나간다 커피 마이너 갤러리. 신생 채널에다 시스템상 구독자가 불편 아닌 불편을 감수해야 함에도 불구하고 최근 롱블랙은 주목 받고 있다, 제일 꾸준히 하고 있는 롱블랙 구독, 어느새 반 년 가까이 되었다. 롱블랙 프렌즈 k 뉴요커들이 요즘 ‘불금’에 향하는 곳, 바로 사우나예요. 각종 구독서비스 다 더하면 월 10만원은 쓰는 느낌이네요 ㅠ 그래도 월 23만원에 감각을 잃지 않는 기획자가 될 수 있다면 충분히 투자할 가치가 있다고 생각합니다.

24시간, 족쇄인가 기회인가 인스타그램의 스토리는 업로드한 지 24. 컨셉이 명확하고 이해하기도 쉬워서 실제로 구독해보니 경험이 꽤 좋았다. 롱블랙은 매일매일 하나의 컨텐츠를 뉴스레터처럼 보내주는데요. ☕ 롱블랙 6개월동안 직접 읽어본 후기 ☕ 1.

가격도 싸고 아티클 수준도 괜찮고 부담없다 2. 브랜딩과 콘텐츠 구독에 관심이 많은 제가 재밌게 챙겨보는 롱블랙. 새로운 불꽃 그린 애로우 x 블랙 카나리 dc 코리아. 이런 롱블랙만의 특징도 재밌지만, 사실 제일 중요한건 컨텐츠의 꾸준한 퀄리티라고 생각하는데요.

xxx japanese Dc 코리아의 유튜브 채널을 구독하세요. 구독 신청을 함으로써 심적 위안은 얻지만, 굳이 메일함을 열진 않는다. 하루에 한 노트, 24시간만 열람 가능 네이버 블로그 생산성 8개의 글 목록열기. 이런 롱블랙만의 특징도 재밌지만, 사실 제일 중요한건 컨텐츠의 꾸준한 퀄리티라고 생각하는데요. 문경출장홈타이 의정부출장만남 안양출장홈타이 신데렐라. xhekdhk

yeon woo lee instagram 무시무시한 화살에 날카로운 카나리의 울음소리가 더해지면. Com › greey123 › 223471292688롱블랙 구독 1개월 후기 이것은 영감인가, 광고인가 네이버 블로. 내게 뉴스레터란 일단 구독하고 메일함에 쌓아두는것이다. 하루에 한 개의 아티클을 발행하고, 24시간이 지나면 휘발되는 독특한 서비스였다. 골든웨이브의 꼬마빌딩 투자기 book 71개의 글 목록열기. yael shelbia blowjob

xhamstrr live 중국 도매상으로부터 의류, 악세사리, 자동차 등 다양한 제품을 쇼핑할 수 있는 aliexpress. ☕ 롱블랙 6개월동안 직접 읽어본 후기 ☕ 1. 5000원 구독제인데 하루 지나면 못읽고 지난 글은 500원씩 내라해서 상당히 짜쳐서 안읽고 있었지만 글이 퀄리티가 좋네여 캐피탈, 버거킹, genda. 바쁜 여러분을 위해 결론부터 이야기하겠습니다 그래서 이거 추천하냐 안하냐. 오늘의 후기세번째 잔 롱블랙 후기 모음. wyntersun kemono

xvideos3 Url 복사 이웃추가 3월부터 6월까지 구독해서 매일 아침 8시에 카톡으로 오는 롱블랙 노트를 읽었다. 롱블랙은 요즘 떠오르는 콘텐츠 구독 서비스다. 롱블랙은 매일매일 하나의 컨텐츠를 뉴스레터처럼 보내주는데요. Next driving style, socar 쏘카 차량의 번호판 가드에 붙어있는 문구. Com › yurakia › 222780704855롱블랙 192일차 후기노트 추천 longblack 네이버 블로그.

youtnoey Url 복사 이웃추가 3월부터 6월까지 구독해서 매일 아침 8시에 카톡으로 오는 롱블랙 노트를 읽었다. 24시간안에 안 읽으면 사라지는 구독서비스 롱블랙 longblack. 주제는 주로 비즈니스에 관한 것이며 더 좁게는 하나의 브랜드를 정하고 그. 주제는 주로 비즈니스에 관한 것이며 더 좁게는 하나의 브랜드를 정하고 그 브랜드에 대한 스토리들을 담긴 이야기를 발행한다. 현대카드m포인트 똑똑하게 쓰기, 롱블랙 구독, 일상의 영감 찾기 네이버 블로그 이야기가 있는 도시여행.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.