Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

로맨스, 판타지, bl 웹툰 8000편 무료 제공 사이트, 신규가입 시 4000원 상당의 코인 즉시 지급. 작품 소개 설레는 사랑을 꿈꾸는 순수낭만소녀 손여은 후추의 다른 만화. ※주의 당신이 박히는 쪽♥ 신흥 사이비 종교 교주, 김교주는 황당한 미션을 받는다. 희성과 3일 안으로 야외플 못하면 죽음 남자랑 어떻게 해.

하지원 진실게임 노출

웹툰만화 섹못죽 단편선 늑대를 길들이는 방법 자신이 만든 게임에 갇히게 된 엘라는 힘들게 꾸린 세상에 애정을 갖고 공략한 남자들과 뜨거운 밤을 보내던 와중 퀘스트창이 뜬다. 웹툰만화 에스톡신 두통에 시달리던 ‘지민’, 의사 ‘권주’로부터 충격적인 진단을 받는다. 19세 미만 구독불가 1화 무료 섹못죽 단편선 에스톡신 유노.

비게퍼 비즈니스 게이 퍼포먼스 커플링으로 엮인 멤버들과 3p를 하지 않으면 죽는다, 단편선 explore tumblr posts and blogs. 최근 10편 은 해당 이용권으로 볼 수 없습니다. 1화 무료 96 토요일 정오까지 프롤로그 무료 공개 첫화부터 프롤로그, 웹툰만화 섹못죽 단편선 비게퍼를 멈춰주세요, 일 때문에 미뤄뒀던 연애 세포들이 반응합니다.

Source ridibooks, translated note part of ridis sengmotjung danpyeonseon 섹못죽 단편선 collection. 희성과 3일 안으로 야외플 못하면 죽음 남자랑 어떻게 해, While they are hesitating, their abilities are stolen, and in the end, the two decide to start the mission unable to tolerate their immaturity, the cclass monster tentacle attacks them. 오늘도 어김없이 원나잇을 즐기던 지호, 숙취에 시달리며 깨어나는데 갑자기 이상한 퀘스트창이 보인다. 본 작품은 1일마다 1편씩 무료 입니다.

하와이대저택 디시

본 작품은 1일마다 1편씩 무료 입니다.. 손가락은 2023년에 제작된 21분짜리 단편영화로, 연기를 업으로 삼은 스승 은정목규리 분과 연기를 꿈꾸는 제자 푸름강채윤 분 사이의 미묘한 관계를 그립니다.. Com › books › 1746027133섹못죽 단편선 비게퍼를 멈춰주세요..

방심하고 여자친구와 섹스하던 중 덜미를 잡히고 만다. 얼마 전 새아빠의 바람피우는 장면을 목격한 팥쥐는 엄마의 재혼이 달갑지가 않다, 여행 첫날부터 일정이 꼬이더니만 눈이 예쁜 남자가 이상한 여행의 한 복판에 끼어들었습니다. 일 때문에 미뤄뒀던 연애 세포들이 반응합니다. 일 때문에 미뤄뒀던 연애 세포들이 반응합니다. 오리지널 만화 성인 장르+ 무료 랭킹 이벤트 선물함.

피폐 역하렘 게임에 갇혀버렸다 무료웹툰 무료보기

늑대를 길들이는 방법 섹못죽 단편선 19금늑대를 길들이는 방법 섹못죽 단편선. 희성과 3일 안으로 야외플 못하면 죽음 남자. 웹툰만화 에스톡신 두통에 시달리던 ‘지민’, 의사 ‘권주’로부터 충격적인 진단을 받는다. 오늘도 어김없이 원나잇을 즐기던 지호, 숙취에 시달리며 깨어나는데 갑자기 이상한 퀘스트창이 보인다, 이런저런 결과에 의하면 이틀 뒤 당신은 죽습니다. 오늘도 어김없이 원나잇을 즐기던 지호, 숙취에 시달리며 깨어나는데 갑자기 이상한 퀘스트창이 보인다.

피딩 아인 porn 권주를 사이코변태의사라고 생각한 것도 잠시 지민의 눈앞에 상태창이 뜬다. 늑대를 길들이는 방법 섹못죽 단편선 19금늑대를 길들이는 방법 섹못죽 단편선. While they are hesitating, their abilities are stolen, and in the end, the two decide to start the mission unable to tolerate their immaturity, the cclass monster tentacle attacks them. 늑대를 길들이는 방법 섹못죽 단편선 19금늑대를 길들이는 방법 섹못죽 단편선. 07 용량 9mb 300 원 대여 섹못죽 단편선 에스톡신 4화 선택 섹못죽 단편선 에스톡신 4화 등록일 2025. 하얀늑대 박은선

플디갤 섹못죽 단편선 콩떡팥떡은 떡 궁합이 찰떡이야. 웹툰만화 섹못죽 단편선 성사지연중 줄곧 짝사랑해 온 직장 상사와 사내섹스하지 않으면 죽는다고. Com › books › 1746027134섹못죽 단편선 3days bl 웹툰 리디. 최근 10편 은 해당 이용권으로 볼 수 없습니다. 섹못죽 단편선 에스톡신 5화 완결 등록일 2025. 프문 김지훈 엄마

하기와 얼굴 디시 일 때문에 미뤄뒀던 연애 세포들이 반응합니다. 웹툰만화 섹못죽 단편선 늑대를 길들이는 방법 자신이 만든 게임에 갇히게 된 엘라는 힘들게 꾸린 세상에 애정을 갖고 공략한 남자들과 뜨거운 밤을 보내던 와중 퀘스트창이 뜬다. 로맨스, 판타지, bl 웹툰 8000편 무료 제공 사이트, 신규가입 시 4000원 상당의 코인 즉시 지급. 신도 10명과 애널 섹스하지 않으면 3일 뒤에 죽습니다. 짝사랑 상대와 사내섹스하지 않으면 죽음. 하여 울 서비스신

플루리부스 7화 19세 미만 구독불가 1화 무료 섹못죽 단편선 에스톡신 유노. 자신이 만든 게임에 갇히게 된 엘라는 힘들게 꾸린 세상에 애정을 갖고 공략한 남자들과 뜨거운 밤을 보내던 와중 퀘스트창이 뜬다. 빚쟁이들을 찾아다니며 수금하던 수는, 이 불쌍한 커플에게 아량을 베풀겠다며 선택지를 제안한다. 손가락은 2023년에 제작된 21분짜리 단편영화로, 연기를 업으로 삼은 스승 은정목규리 분과 연기를 꿈꾸는 제자 푸름강채윤 분 사이의 미묘한 관계를 그립니다. While they are hesitating, their abilities are stolen, and in the end, the two decide to start the mission unable to tolerate their immaturity, the cclass monster tentacle attacks them.

픽셀올스타즈 권주를 사이코변태의사라고 생각한 것도 잠시 지민의 눈앞에 상태창이 뜬다. 희성과 3일 안으로 야외플 못하면 죽음 남자랑 어떻게 해. 수상한 의사가 말해준 유일한 치료제는 ‘타인의 정액’. 신도 10명과 애널 섹스하지 않으면 3일 뒤에 죽습니다. ※주의 당신이 박히는 쪽♥ 신흥 사이비 종교 교주, 김교주는.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.