Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

엄청난 노력을 해주셨습니다 ㅠㅡㅜ 진짜진짜 감동이에요 그리고 찍고나서는. Com › _kshxfs › 98221427반하리 사진관 카카오톡채널. 올데이 프로젝트 애니 포즈 추천으로 매력 발산하기. Com › studio_banhari › reels반하리 사진관 안양사진관 @studio_banhari instagram photos a.

Fc-24694056

더쿠사진관에선 여권사진이 2만원이라 아주 가성비있게 찍을 수 있었고, 집과도 가까워서 냉큼 예약했다.. Com › duagusgk95 › 222869163754안양 사진관 반하리사진관 네이버 블로그.. 오늘은 지수님이 안양사진관에 방문해주셨어요.. 돌아오지않을 2023년의 마지막을 기록하러 반하리에 오세요..

오늘은 증명사진이 필요해 동네사진관을 알아보던 중 반하리사진관이라는 곳에 방문하게되었어요. 나 이런글 올려도 되나 싶은데 내 얘기좀 들어 줄래. 주차공간은 없지만, 주변에 공영주차장이. 한분씩 순차적으로 답을 해드리기때문에 답변이 늦어질 수 있다는 점 양해 부탁드리고 순차적으로 확인후 매세지 보내드려요, 주차공간은 없지만, 주변에 공영주차장이.

Fc2-ppv-4620399

안양사진관 반하리사진관, 사진찍으면 칭찬받는 곳ㅋ 내돈. 반하리 사진관의 장점은 찍으시는 사장님의 섬세함과 센스 그리고 예쁨을 포착해주시는 거 ♥ 어디가 예쁜지 어떤 색이 예쁜지 어떤 표정 자세가 더 나은지 뚝딱거리는 저를 위해. 당시에는 신생이였음 @studio_banhari님이 instagram을 사용 중입니다 1,959명이 @studio_banhari님의 계정을 팔로우합니다 팔로워 1,959명, 팔로잉 821명, 게시물 267개 안양사진관 반하리사진관 @studio_banhari님의 instagram 사진 및 동영상 보기.

그만큼 그저 가깝기 보다는 사진을 보고 찾아와주신다고 생각해요, 광주 최고의 참치집 소개와 추천 메뉴. 그리고 시그니처 안무 포즈를 해 주세요, 반하리사진관 added a new photo to the album 반하리사진관 — in anyang, south korea.

서울특별시 서울 서울사진관 서울증명사진 서울여권사진 서울프로필사진 안양 안양사진관 안양증명사진 안양여권사진 안양프로필사진 반하리사진관 0 8 인쇄. 안양 사진관 안양사진관 안양역사진관 반하리사진관 증명사진 안양증명사진 안양역증명사진 증명사진맛집 취업사진 안양취업사진 프로필사진 안양프로필사진 일상 일상블로그 공감 서이추환영 서이추 댓글 4 블로그 카페 keep 메모 보내기 인쇄. 더쿠사진관은 당서초등학교 옆 건물의 3층인데.

Fc23750179

Com › studiobanhari반하리사진관 facebook. Com › studio_banhari반하리 사진관 안양사진관 @studio_banhari instagram stories an. 반하리 사진관 공식채널 친구 8,903 2월 예약안내 116일 금요일 저녁10시부터 2월 예약이 오픈 됩니다, 오며가며 한 번 가보고싶다고 생각했는데, 12월에는 예약이 마감되어서 예약 못 하다가 1월에 찍게되었어요. 반하리 사진관 안양사진관 @studio_banhari 안양 만안구 냉천로203번길 24,2층 1인 대표작가 증명사진,기록사진,프로필,다인프로필 100%예약제, 카카오채널 반하리사진관 ⬇️ 예약링크,dm x 카톡😎 top nine of 2025.

용봉동의 인기 참치집에서 1인분으로 1.. Com › duagusgk95 › 222869163754안양 사진관 반하리사진관 네이버 블로그..

위치는 서울 당산로 41길 18, 본빌딩 3층 이다. 안양반하리사진관은 카페 2층에 있어요❗️. 영등포구청역과 당산역 쪽에 있는 더쿠사진관. 다영 증사와 함께하는 반하리사진관 오픈 소식, 가격표는 본문 아래에 있음 반하리 사진관 안양사진관 @studio_banhari instagram 사진 및 동영상 팔로워 10k명, 팔로잉 1,089명, 게시물 1,203개 반하리 사진관 안양사진관 @studio_banhari님의 instagram 사진 및 동영상 보기 instagram.

fc2-ppv-4304385 사진관 오픈, 다영 증사, 반하리사진관, 2월. 돌아오지않을 2023년의 마지막을 기록하러 반하리에 오세요. 가격표는 본문 아래에 있음 반하리 사진관 안양사진관 @studio_banhari instagram 사진 및 동영상 팔로워 10k명, 팔로잉 1,089명, 게시물 1,203개 반하리 사진관 안양사진관 @studio_banhari님의 instagram 사진 및 동영상 보기 instagram. 장어초밥이 일품인 미미참치에서 특별한 맛을 경험하세요. Studio_banhari 반하리 사진관. fc2ppv 사이트

fc2ppv2763672 사진관 오픈, 다영 증사, 반하리사진관, 2월. 나 이런글 올려도 되나 싶은데 내 얘기좀 들어 줄래. 안양 사진관 반하리사진관 네이버 블로그 daily 99개의 글 목록열기. Com › postview안양사진관, 반하리사진관 오픈. 더쿠사진관에선 여권사진이 2만원이라 아주 가성비있게 찍을 수 있었고, 집과도 가까워서 냉큼 예약했다. fansly baddslayer

fc2 vedio 그만큼 그저 가깝기 보다는 사진을 보고 찾아와주신다고 생각해요. Com › studio_banhari › reels반하리 사진관 안양사진관 @studio_banhari instagram photos a. 위치는 서울 당산로 41길 18, 본빌딩 3층 이다. 당시에는 신생이였음 @studio_banhari님이 instagram을 사용 중입니다 1,959명이 @studio_banhari님의 계정을 팔로우합니다 팔로워 1,959명, 팔로잉 821명, 게시물 267개 안양사진관 반하리사진관 @studio_banhari님의 instagram 사진 및 동영상 보기. Com › _kshxfs카카오톡채널 반하리 사진관. fc2 1855975

fc2ppv miki 반하리사진관 added a new photo to the album 반하리사진관 — in anyang, south korea. Com › minute_moment › 222735116518안양 반하리 사진관 ㄹㅇ 반함 네이버 블로그. 더쿠사진관에선 여권사진이 2만원이라 아주 가성비있게 찍을 수 있었고, 집과도 가까워서 냉큼 예약했다. 너무 즐거웠고 감사했어요☺️ 다음에도 또 봬요. 그만큼 그저 가깝기 보다는 사진을 보고 찾아와주신다고 생각해요.

fc2-ppv 3951011 ⠀ 추석연휴 예약가능 조기 마감될 수 있어요. 홍대 ak플라자 3층의 일본 감성 레트로 잡화점 이와야를 소개합니다. 안양 사진관 안양사진관 안양역사진관 반하리사진관 증명사진 안양증명사진 안양역증명사진 증명사진맛집 취업사진 안양취업사진 프로필사진 안양프로필사진 일상 일상블로그 공감 서이추환영 서이추 댓글 4 블로그 카페 keep 메모 보내기 인쇄. 반하리 사진관 공식채널 친구 8,903 2월 예약안내 116일 금요일 저녁10시부터 2월 예약이 오픈 됩니다. 가격표는 본문 아래에 있음 반하리 사진관 안양사진관 @studio_banhari instagram 사진 및 동영상 팔로워 10k명, 팔로잉 1,089명, 게시물 1,203개 반하리 사진관 안양사진관 @studio_banhari님의 instagram 사진 및 동영상 보기 instagram.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.