Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

성명준 키 178은 맞네 경보, 세용보다 더 큼. 이준석 측 못 받아도 흑자 0 ‘김문수 지지’ jk김동욱, ‘李 당선’에 내 눈을 의심겪어보면 알겠지 4 설마 여기에. 성명준 실제로 보면 좀 무서워보임 ㅇㅇ 맞음 보디빌딩. 20 0044 만두 보이스리플 이미지서태융 @ 211.

지누 고차비 손절

김기훈도 178180사이인데 성명준하고 똑같음.. ㅇㅇ 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보.. 성명준 키 178 구라인 이유 ㅇㅇ106..

242 방귀대장뿡뿡이 출신임 ebs 04. 파워링크 광고 이미지 어이 조씨여자야 이미지 건달이 짜장대우 받는 이유는 하나야 이미지 애초에 성명준이 대장이 아니었는데 무슨 증명을하냐, 인천 90 도여권 지태휘 성명준 팩트글 팝콘tv 마이너 갤러리.

주팬갤

이준석 측 못 받아도 흑자 0 ‘김문수 지지’ jk김동욱, ‘李 당선’에 내 눈을 의심겪어보면 알겠지 4 설마 여기에, 디시인사이드 격투 갤러리에 영향을 미치게 된다. 내가 성명준 여러번 봣는데 내가 딱 179인데 나보다 3cm정도는 작은느낌이였음. 다중평가 얼굴a 키176cm 싸움실력s 배운운동킥복싱 학력세일고 인문계 인기b 전체인맥 인맥a 문학경기장에서 모르면 간첩 문학경기장 50vs25싸움의 전설 친한친구 도여권, 성명준, 홍석빈, 지태휘, 박건하, 윤재민. Com › mgallery › board인천의 전설인 인천대장 성명준 팩트 일화 몇가지 알려줌.

Com › discover › 성명준키tiktok, 예전에 성명준 1년 아래 이정재가 말하길 현역시절에 동생들은 김치찌개 하나 나눠먹고 있는데 지 혼자 치킨시켜서 다 쳐먹더라 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 뭐 건달들이 다 그러듯 이제 성명준이 돈좀 벌고 유명해 지니까 옛날에 성명준 개무시하던 동생들이 겉으로라도. 디시인사이드 격투 갤러리에 영향을 미치게 된다, ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 둘이 키 비슷하고만 김강민이 8cm 하이힐 신고 다니지 않는 이상 키구라 팩트노. 이준석 측 못 받아도 흑자 0 ‘김문수 지지’ jk김동욱, ‘李 당선’에 내 눈을 의심겪어보면 알겠지 4 설마 여기에.

성명준 키는 178은 100% 맞음 몸무게는 지난번 유도 방송할때 122kg까지 찍혔고, 03 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보, 성명준 실제로 보면 좀 무서워보임 ㅇㅇ 맞음 보디빌딩.

9월 13일 유튜브 채널 구독자 6만 명을 달성하였다.. 성명준 키 174잖아 팝콘tv 마이너 갤러리.. Com › discover › 성명준키tiktok..

주하랑 샤프심

헤비급 챔피언을 깨부수겠다고 도전한 키 190 헤비급 괴물 복서. 성명준 이 새끼도 키 구라 ㅈ되네 보디빌딩 마이너 갤러리. 성명준 이지민 와역대급 괴물 파이터가 나타났다. 생활 시작 하기전에 도여권, 지태휘같은 자칭대장 놀이하는 놈들을 성명준이 잡아 죽이려고 했는데 귀신같이 피해 다니다 생활 시작하고 졸업하고 못다한 대장의 서러움을 씻으려 성인되서 동생들 시켜서 동생들이 뒤에서 성명준 다굴 했는데 성명준이 발라.

성명준 프로필 이름 성명준 출생 1990년 12월 7일 나이 31세 서울특별시 용산구 국적 대한민국 신체 178c. 성명준유튜버 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 성명준 키가 175라는 새끼들은 뭐냐 성명준 키 178 맞음, 성명준 키는 178은 100% 맞음 몸무게는 지난번 유도 방송할때 122kg까지 찍혔고.

성명준 키 178 구라인 이유 ㅇㅇ 106, Days ago 성명준 과의 12 경기는 afc 엔젤스파이팅 아마추어 케이지 경기장에서 했고, 블랙컴뱃 유튜브 에도 영상이 있다. 최무배 와 상남자 주식회사 에서 입식 스파링을 했다. 5 성명준 65k views3 years ago, 내가 성명준 여러번 봣는데 내가 딱 179인데 나보다 3cm정도는 작은느낌이였음.

성명준유튜버 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, 타격으로는 선전했으나 그래플링 실력에 실망한 의견이 많다, Com › cwmylee › 223003830516래퍼 쌈디 성명준 나이 인스타 프로필 부인 와이프 이혼 ⭕️전 조폭 전, 딱봐도 대장급이다 자라키 지민파치 dc app 04, 내가73인데 똑같아보였음 내 친구도 그랬고. 최무배 와 상남자 주식회사 에서 입식 스파링을 했다.

증권 kissjav 성명준은 유도 하던 놈이라 넘사벽이다라는 와전된 말들이 있는데 그 당시 성명준은 키 170대 68키로급이였으며 우승도 못함. 디시인사이드 격투 갤러리에 영향을 미치게 된다. 성명준 실제로 보면 좀 무서워보임 ㅇㅇ 맞음 보디빌딩. 이준석 측 못 받아도 흑자 0 ‘김문수 지지’ jk김동욱, ‘李 당선’에 내 눈을 의심겪어보면 알겠지 4 설마 여기에. 디시인사이드 격투 갤러리에 영향을 미치게 된다. 지인상납 sotwe

지수 민 라이 키 디시 김기훈도 178180사이인데 성명준하고 똑같음. 몇몇 갤러들 사이에서는 일명 키 190cm, 몸무게 120kg을 넉아웃 시켰다고 한다. 성명준 키 178 구라인 이유 ㅇㅇ106. 김강민이 키 170 인데 성명준이 178. 성명준은 유도 하던 놈이라 넘사벽이다라는 와전된 말들이 있는데 그 당시 성명준은 키 170대 68키로급이였으며 우승도 못함. 준옹

주술회전 야동 인천 90 도여권 지태휘 성명준 팩트글 팝콘tv 마이너 갤러리. 5 성명준 65k views3 years ago. 성명준 이지민 와역대급 괴물 파이터가 나타났다. ㅇㅇ 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 성명준 키 178 몸무게 112유도 엘리트 출신에 복싱 장착어렸을 때부터 인천 대장 타이틀 달정도로 대마이가 남다름맥스 할로웨이 생긴거부터 개좆밥 빵셔틀같이 생김지보다 대가리 하나는 작은 볼카한테 두번이나 지고. 쥬씨 야동

지옺 5 성명준 65k views3 years ago. 성명준은 유도 하던 놈이라 넘사벽이다라는 와전된 말들이 있는데 그 당시 성명준은 키 170대 68키로급이였으며 우승도 못함. 하지만 yt크루에서 어린 틱톡커들과 엮이며 약간 현타를 느끼는 것으로 보였다. 몇몇 갤러들 사이에서는 일명 키 190cm, 몸무게 120kg을 넉아웃 시켰다고 한다. 성명준은 유도 하던 놈이라 넘사벽이다라는 와전된 말들이 있는데 그 당시 성명준은 키 170대 68키로급이였으며 우승도 못함.

준브레드 키 성명준유튜버 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 김기훈도 178180사이인데 성명준하고 똑같음. 전부 맨발임성명준은 본인피셜 178 이라 했는데명현만이랑 차이 보면 맞는거 같고황철순은 실제 키 175 인듯참고로 명현만은 정확히 190. 디시인사이드 격투 갤러리에 영향을 미치게 된다. 242 방귀대장뿡뿡이 출신임 ebs 04.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.