Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Imessageでは、テキスト、高解像度の写真やビデオ、ドキュメント、リンク、 tapback、テキストエフェクト、ライブステッカー、メッセージエフェクトなど を送信できます。 imessageは、配信証明と開封証明、タイピングインジケータに対応しています。. また、電話番号を使ってメッセージを送受信するsmsは「1通あたり◯円」のように送信料金が発生しますが、imessageの送信料金は無料です。 snsとは異なり. Fukgram on janu 隠し扉の先にある人気焼き鳥居酒屋の新店舗 店舗詳細はこちら @amato. imessageで電話番号が使用できない 設定ーメッセージー送受信 の欄に電話番号が表示されず、使用できません。 apple idのサインアウトーサインイン、デバイスの再起動を実施しましたが 追加されません。.

아크테릭스 콜라 유푸

Com › jajp › 108758メッセージやfacetimeで電話番号を追加・削除する apple サポート.. Iphone 電話番号を教えずにメッセージを送る方法.. Com › jajp › 102641アカウント復旧用の連絡先を設定する apple サポート 日本..

아이코스 시연

아이돌 젖꼭지

ベストアンサー 設定→appleid→名前電話番号メール→imassagetofacetimeの番号に該当の電話番号が登録されているかの確認をしてみてください。 一旦電話.. Fukgram ←他の投稿を見る ️ 大名にある居酒屋ちんぷんかんぷん stand up 大名店 @cpkp_standup_daimyoさん ☑︎焼き鳥各種 ¥150〜 ☑︎おでん3種盛り合わせ ¥500 ☑︎カツオと葉わさび.. Apple accountで使用できる各種メールアドレスを追加、変更、削除する方法をご説明します。..

아트그라비아 유디

아이돌 디시 Imessage や facetime で 電話番号や apple id が使われる. 328 likes, 1 comments tokyogourmet3 on decem ↓店舗詳細↓毎日投稿 フォローしてね 他の投稿はこちら→@tokyogourmet3 この店行きたい！と思ったら右の「」から保存！ 串焼専門 佐五右衛門 中目黒 （@sagoemon_nakameguro） ️住所東京都目黒区上目黒2133 gems中目黒 6f ️最寄り駅東急東横線. Imessageをオンにします。 imessageで使用する電話番号やメールアドレスを選択するには、「送受信」をタップしてから、「以下の連絡先でimessageの送受信ができます」の下. You can use the phone number of your iphone with messages and facetime on your mac, ipad, or ipod touch. Com › jajp › 111104iphoneやipadで電話番号、連絡先、メールアドレスを着信拒否する ap. 아오이 방귀

아침에 안 서요 디시 Iphone で使用している電話番号を更新してください最近電話番号を変更した場合は、appleアカウント旧apple idの設定を更新してください。これにより、iphoneで重要なセキュリティ機能、imessage、facetime、アカウント回復ツールへのアクセスを失うことを防げます。このwikihowガイドでは、iphoneで電話. 電話番号を設定する 「設定」を開きます。「アプリ」をタップし、「メッセージ」を選択します。 「送受信」をタップします。 「imessageの送受信に使用可能な連絡先」. Iphone で imessage を設定しようとしているのですが、自分の電話番号を選択できず、apple id のメールアドレスだけが選択された状態です。電話番号を. Apple accountで使用できる各種メールアドレスを追加、変更、削除する方法をご説明します。. Net › qanda › imessagetelnumberimessageと電話番号の紐付け解除するには. 아프리카 룰라 단종

아이네 굴 디시 アカウント復旧用の連絡先が設定してあれば、万一apple accountのパスワードやデバイスのパスコードを忘れてしまっても、いつでもアカウントにアクセスできるようになります。iphone、ipad、macで復旧用連絡先を設定する方法をご案内します。. Iphoneでメッセージを設定する apple サポート 日本. ベストアンサー 設定→appleid→名前電話番号メール→imassagetofacetimeの番号に該当の電話番号が登録されているかの確認をしてみてください。 一旦電話. 一方、ipad （wifi モデル） や mac など、電話番号のない端末で imessage／facetime を使うためには、識別情報として apple id が必要になってきます。. Iphoneでメッセージを設定する apple サポート 日本. 아야세 모모 짤

아이온2 mac 関連： macで電話をかけたり応答したりする方法 番号を削除する 番号を削除するには、削除するデバイスのimessageとfacetimeの設定で番号の横にあるチェックボックスをオフにします。 これにより、そのデバイスで今後の通話やテキストを受信できなくなります。. 51 likes, 0 comments sumibiyakitoriharu on janu こんにちは！ 炭火 やき鳥 haru です！ 昨年実は、タレントの土屋アンナさんのyoutube収録でご利用いただきました 出張人と呑んでみた。〜ビジネスパーソンの本音〜 youtubeの2話拡大版の3分〜ご覧いただけますので、チェックしてみてください 収録. 深刻なバグにより、apple は ios アップデートを延期。. Imessageがオンになっていることを確認してください。 「送受信」をタップし、「imessageにapple accountを使用」を選択して、apple accountでサインインします。 同じapple accountを使って、ほかのデバイスでメッセージとfacetimeにサインインし直します。. 230 likes, 4 comments suishin_hiroshima on janu ハモそうめん ハモのすり身で作った特製そうめん！ ぷりっとした食感に噛むほどに広がるハモの旨みと、上品でコクのあるハモ出汁の美味しさがたまりません襤 素材本来の旨みがしっかりと伝わる逸品でした ※総料理長の創作料理のため.

아이유 설리 리얼 더쿠 「+81」以外は弊社から配信したものではないためご注意ください。 以下リンクより送信元の電話番号が正しいかご確認ください。 vpassidでログインのカードの. Likes, 0 comments motherth. アカウント復旧用の連絡先が設定してあれば、万一apple accountのパスワードやデバイスのパスコードを忘れてしまっても、いつでもアカウントにアクセスできるようになります。iphone、ipad、macで復旧用連絡先を設定する方法をご案内します。. 先日、携帯のキャリアをdocomoからuqmobileに乗り換えると、imessageとfacetimeが利用できなくなっていることに気づきました。 設定→メッセージ→imessageをonにしても、. Iphone で使用している電話番号を更新してください最近電話番号を変更した場合は、appleアカウント旧apple idの設定を更新してください。これにより、iphoneで重要なセキュリティ機能、imessage、facetime、アカウント回復ツールへのアクセスを失うことを防げます。このwikihowガイドでは、iphoneで電話.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.