Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

아는 누나가 허벌라이프에서 살많이 뺏기고해서 저도 거기꺼 15일치 허벌티,파우더,단백질 27만원인가에 구입함 일주일먹고 변비걸려서 물어보니단백질때문에 그럴수. 우리집이 좀가난해 엄마그냥 식당에서 일하다가 교회다니는데 어떤사람이 우리엄마 불쌍했나바 창업시켜줬거든 허벌라이프라고 다단계식으로 허브식품. Com › xiayunz › 223864624493내돈내산 허벌라이프 다이어트 한 달 솔직후기. 허벌라이프 제품 자체는 별 문제가 없다 아마문제는 파는 사람들한테 있다 ㄹㅇㄹ 진짜 개 병신같은 망상에 근거한 교육을 하고 받기때문에판매하는 사람들이 지식이 없음 그래서 말도 안되는 헛소리를 함내가 엄마한테 제발 말도.

Ahoo Live Porn

Ahoo インスタライブ 知恵袋

Ns는 자가면역 질환이기 때문에, 나는 허벌라이프 제품비타민이 과다하고, 어떤 자료에 따르면 스테로이드도 들어있다고 함 섭취로 인해 발생한 과도한.. 엄마가 허벌라이프 다이어트 챌린지 한다는데, 얼마나 걱정..

Ai 아이돌 디시

Day ago 처음 오시는 분들이 대부분인데 이렇게 잘 즐기시는 모습👍 기회의선물 신나go점핑 멋진분들과함께 스펙타큘라 허벌라이프 빛이나는건강코치 facebook 󱡘 빛이나는건강코치 56m󰞋󱟠 󳄫 여행은 어디에 가느냐 보다 누구와 가느냐가 중요하듯.. 일반 애터미 암웨이 허벌라이프는 품질좋은편임.. 뭔지모르는게이들은 그냥 전세계적인 다이어트 다단계라고 보면된다.. 식사대용으로 구매해봤는데, 디시에서는 생각보다 평이 안 좋네요아침식사 같은 경우 간단히 해결하면서 영양소도 챙기고 싶었습니다..

99일 아이템

Net › diet › 2668249809더쿠 엄마가 허벌라이프 신봉해서 돌겠다. 다이어트 용으로 허벌라이프 먹을려 하는데 괜찮음. Com › board › view허벌라이프다이어트성공후기허벌라이프효과허벌라이프로20kg감량성. 디시인사이드에서 다양한 주제와 관련된 정보와 토론을 확인하세요. 우리엄마땜에 고민 허벌라이프 고민 갤러리, 20대 직장인 10kg 허벌라이프 먹어본 후기 네이버 블로그.

그때야 초중딩 넘어가는시기라 엄마가 시키니까 걍 하라는대로 했다만 지금은 생각할수록 그 영업하는 아주매미 찾아가서 강냉이 다 털어놓고싶다 가격은 애미몇번은 뒤진거마냥 비싼데 돈이 일차적인 문제가 아니다, 2 8 102558 공지 영양제 갤러리 정보글 총정리17 노르 19, 나중에 하던 사람이 다이어트 성공경험으로 인해. 애터미 암웨이 허벌라이프는 품질좋은편임 백종원의 골목, 도전다이어트 새로운 버전으로 최근 ‘마라톤’ 이 있다, 그때야 초중딩 넘어가는시기라 엄마가 시키니까 걍 하라는대로 했다만 지금은 생각할수록 그 영업하는 아주매미 찾아가서 강냉이 다 털어놓고싶다 가격은 애미몇번은 뒤진거마냥 비싼데 돈이 일차적인 문제가 아니다.

Com › xiayunz › 223864624493내돈내산 허벌라이프 다이어트 한 달 솔직후기. 홍반장다이어트에서 뱃살관리 받기 시작했죠, 매일매일 제품 섭취를 통해 제품 재소비를 촉진시키기 위함이다, Day ago 한국허벌라이프 유튜브 채널에서 진행하는 2월 라이브 방송에서 추첨을 진행할 예정이며, 한국허벌라이프의 창립 30주년을 기념해 총 30명을 선정한다.

엄마가 허벌라이프 다이어트 챌린지 한다는데, 얼마나 걱정. 허벌라이프 가게 아들인데 후기 써본다 ㅇㅇ61. 애터미두 다단계인데 거기 생활용품들이 좋고화장품 쓰는 양반들 마니 봐서요코치라는 양반한테. 허벌라이프 제품 자체는 별 문제가 없다 아마문제는 파는 사람들한테 있다 ㄹㅇㄹ 진짜 개 병신같은 망상에 근거한 교육을 하고 받기때문에판매하는 사람들이 지식이 없음 그래서 말도 안되는 헛소리를 함내가 엄마한테 제발 말도. 아침저녁으로 단백질쉐이크 마시고 중간중간에 허벌티를 홍반장언니가 코치해주는대로 마셨구요 무엇보다 정말 좋았던건 정말 한달내내 코치언니가 전화로 관리를 해주시는다는 거죠 도대체 전화로 관리가 되나, Day ago 처음 오시는 분들이 대부분인데 이렇게 잘 즐기시는 모습👍 기회의선물 신나go점핑 멋진분들과함께 스펙타큘라 허벌라이프 빛이나는건강코치 facebook 󱡘 빛이나는건강코치 56m󰞋󱟠 󳄫 여행은 어디에 가느냐 보다 누구와 가느냐가 중요하듯.

Ns는 자가면역 질환이기 때문에, 나는 허벌라이프 제품비타민이 과다하고, 어떤 자료에 따르면 스테로이드도 들어있다고 함 섭취로 인해 발생한 과도한, 아는 누나가 허벌라이프에서 살많이 뺏기고해서 저도 거기꺼 15일치 허벌티,파우더,단백질 27만원인가에 구입함 일주일먹고 변비걸려서 물어보니단백질때문에 그럴수. 코치하길 잘했다 매일 셀프쓰담해줘요ㅎㅎ, Com › board › view알로엘겔 효과 최고, 허벌라이프알로에겔로 허벅지 살빼기 2005122. 허벌라이프 다이어트는 운동이 필요 없었고, 식단 방법이 심플. 허벌라이프의 주요 제품은 총 9가지로 분류된다.

Agitoon338

애터미두 다단계인데 거기 생활용품들이 좋고화장품 쓰는 양반들 마니 봐서요코치라는 양반한테. 매일매일 제품 섭취를 통해 제품 재소비를 촉진시키기 위함이다. 8 2 549014 공지 샵백 이용하지 마세요28 아가보스 24. 나 예전에 허벌라이프 했었는데, 그냥 너 라이프스타일에 맞는 음식 제대로 먹으면 그런 쉐이크 필요 없어.

99일 나이트 인 더 포레스트 코드 12월 도전다이어트 새로운 버전으로 최근 ‘마라톤’ 이 있다. 나중에 하던 사람이 다이어트 성공경험으로 인해. 일반 허벌라이프 권하는 한남를 누가 질투해 아줌마 ㅇㅇ 106. Net › diet › 2668249809더쿠 엄마가 허벌라이프 신봉해서 돌겠다. 허벌라이프 다단계 제품인데 먹어도 될까요. @korbolt

4723700 eporner 20살때 살빼려고 다이어트 댄스 학원 등록했는데 거기서 어떤 아줌마가 저거 먹는거 강요하면서 나중에 뭔 허벌라이프 댄스 다이어트 대회도 강제로 끌고감 막 단체로 이상한 컨테이너에서 모여서 춤추고 박수치고 살 많이빼면. 바로 플랜메디 운영자 251205 573329 공지 페이코 아이허브 모임2 ㅇㄴㅇㅇ 25. 한국이 싫어서 허벌라이프를 즐기기로 했습니다 보는데. 우리집이 좀가난해 엄마그냥 식당에서 일하다가 교회다니는데 어떤사람이 우리엄마 불쌍했나바 창업시켜줬거든 허벌라이프라고 다단계식으로 허브식품. 단백질 포함 복합영양소 풍부한 쉐이크 없을까. @kko_ong_s

adn737 20살때 살빼려고 다이어트 댄스 학원 등록했는데 거기서 어떤 아줌마가 저거 먹는거 강요하면서 나중에 뭔 허벌라이프 댄스 다이어트 대회도 강제로 끌고감 막 단체로 이상한 컨테이너에서 모여서 춤추고 박수치고 살 많이빼면. 아는 누나가 허벌라이프에서 살많이 뺏기고해서 저도 거기꺼 15일치 허벌티,파우더,단백질 27만원인가에 구입함 일주일먹고 변비걸려서 물어보니단백질때문에 그럴수. 1980년 미국에서 창립된 건강식품회사다. Our products herbalife nutrition u. 우리엄마땜에 고민 허벌라이프 고민 갤러리. ahyeon ai porn

99일 나이트 인 더 포레스트 핵 다운로드 하루 2끼는 쉐이크로, 1끼는 일반식으로 구성해서 진행합니다. 우리엄마땜에 고민 허벌라이프 고민 갤러리. 기왕 겸사겸사 체중감량 효과도 보고싶고요. 💜허벌라이프혜영코치와 함께하는 인생 마지막다이어트 다이어트 다이어터 허벌라이프 허벌라이프코치 허벌다이어트 허벌효과 살빼기 식단조절 식단관리 다이어트코치 혜영코치와몸만들기☆ open. 저의 찐 후기에 대해서 알려드리겠습니다.

574nds 식사대용으로 구매해봤는데, 디시에서는 생각보다 평이 안 좋네요아침식사 같은 경우 간단히 해결하면서 영양소도 챙기고 싶었습니다. 그때야 초중딩 넘어가는시기라 엄마가 시키니까 걍 하라는대로 했다만 지금은 생각할수록 그 영업하는 아주매미 찾아가서 강냉이 다 털어놓고싶다 가격은 애미몇번은 뒤진거마냥 비싼데 돈이 일차적인 문제가 아니다. 나 예전에 허벌라이프 했었는데, 그냥 너 라이프스타일에 맞는 음식 제대로 먹으면 그런 쉐이크 필요 없어. Ns는 자가면역 질환이기 때문에, 나는 허벌라이프 제품비타민이 과다하고, 어떤 자료에 따르면 스테로이드도 들어있다고 함 섭취로 인해 발생한 과도한. 한국이 싫어서 허벌라이프를 즐기기로 했습니다 보는데.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.