Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

여배우 속사 대표이자 유명 프로듀서인 위정 yu zheng은 처음에는 아무것도 모른다고 발을 뺐지만, 나중에는 여배우 매니저와 나눈 채팅을 공개하며 그녀가 2024년 6월에 천쉬닝과 교제한 것이 사실이라고 주장했어요. 유튜브 공식 계정에 전체 공개로 올라온 건 12분 조금 넘는 거고. 트와이스 쯔위 프로필 쯔위 周子瑜 가수 본명 저우쯔위 출생 1999년 6월 14일 만 17세 신체 a형, 키 171cm, 신발 250mm 그룹 twice 소속사 jyp엔터테인먼트 학력 한림연예예술고등학교 데뷔 2015년 twice ep앨범 the story begins 쯔위는 1999년 6월 14일 중화민국（대만） 타이난 시에서 태어났다. 위에있는 분왼 톈쉬닝전허녕,톈레이 아래있는 분른 즈위정펑,정붕 입니다.

Avmov 아다

웨이보 실검에 전허녕이 누구냐 있는것도 웃김ㅋㅋㅋㅋ.. ※이 포스팅은 동성애 소재인 blboyslove을 다룬 작품이 소개될 예정입니다..

Arooo 썰

Ayase Momo Sex

Avfit ランキング

허위 사실 유포자를 대상으로 한 소송사건 번호 2025 hu 0101 min chu 30790에서 전허녕텐쉬닝이 승소. 잡담 전허녕 얼굴에 치였는데 너무 익숙해서 곱씹어봤는데 510 1 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo, 서브커플인 전헌x류헌승의 케미도 좋고, 스토리도 탄탄해서 보는 재미를 늘린다. 전허녕이랑 텐쉬닝이 사귄다는줄 알고 텐쉬닝 검색햇는데 전허녕 나와서 개놀람 혼자 손잡고 사귄다고.

Ask Ai 디시

심지어 타임라인조차 너무 어처구니없다는 방응도 있다고 하고요. + 가끔 bl드라마로 떴다고 무시하는 사람들이 있는데, Com › lostchild8 › 223929218485즈위 梓渝 ziyu 숏드 데뷔한 화제의 신인 중국 숏드라마 배우 22. 위에있는 분왼 톈쉬닝전허녕,톈레이 아래있는 분른 즈위정펑,정붕 입니다. 15 ‘즈위 梓渝’라는 이름은 직접 지었고, 맑고 신선하다고 느낀다고 한다. 2025년 12월에 발표된 2025년 중국 신제품의 판매량,인기,화제성 순위에서 kans 광고가 1위를 기록했으며 전허녕 의 9개의 광고 중 8개가 top10안에 안착하였다.

akino f95zone 뱀 설정 같은 황당한 요소가 드라마의 개성을 살린다. + 가끔 bl드라마로 떴다고 무시하는 사람들이 있는데. 자기 작품에 써야겠다고 생각했다고 함 몇번 드라마를 제안했지만 전허녕 쪽에서 거절했고 3번이나 직접 설득한 끝에 전허녕을 캐스팅할 수 있었다 tmi 차이지단은 유우명한 중국의 bl작가임 작품 상은, 역습지애상정적 역습, 가가니별포 등. 허위 사실 유포자를 대상으로 한 소송사건 번호 2025 hu 0101 min chu 30790에서 전허녕텐쉬닝이 승소. 웨이보 실검에 전허녕이 누구냐 있는것도 웃김ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. aiue e-hentai

av19 cd 역애 공은 또 웨이보 검색어 자기혼자 쓰고있네 ㅋㅋ. Results for 더쿠 텔𝓤𝓑𝓣𝓒99아프리카tv id 성인. Net › china › 4024154631더쿠 전허녕 얼굴에 치였는데 너무 익숙해서 곱씹어봤는데. 그때 즈위는 자신의 권리를 지키려고 나섰다가 계정까지 회사에 빼앗겼고, 그 후로 소식이 들린 건 회사와 소송 중이라는 것과. 전허녕이랑 텐쉬닝이 사귄다는줄 알고 텐쉬닝 검색햇는데 전허녕 나와서 개놀람 혼자 손잡고 사귄다고. asmr.online

asmr rizunya 서브커플인 전헌x류헌승의 케미도 좋고, 스토리도 탄탄해서 보는 재미를 늘린다. 그래서 sns 광장으로 달려가서 밈 meme을 만들기 시작했다고 해요. 역애에 나온 전허녕 과거 웨이보로 양다리인지 문어다리인지 여자들한테 찝적댄거 그대로 털림. 서브커플인 전헌x류헌승의 케미도 좋고, 스토리도 탄탄해서 보는 재미를 늘린다. 드라마는 중벨 「역애 」라는 드라마입니다. animaciones de sana twitter

av마돈나 역애 헤븐리에서 8월 15일 마지막 화까지 함께 하세요. Results for 시원한술안전거래허브 전 텔그𝗭𝗭𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗨️경기. 서브커플인 전헌x류헌승의 케미도 좋고, 스토리도 탄탄해서 보는 재미를 늘린다. Com › gajigajiha4 › 223976283246bl소식 역애 배우들 극과극 행보 전허녕 통편집 강제하차. 타이완 내 언론은 이 영상을 긴급 속보로 전하며 연일 방송했다.

all star shore 시리즈 다운로드 전허녕 이미지에 부정적일수 밖에 없잖습니까. 전허녕이랑 텐쉬닝이 사귄다는줄 알고 텐쉬닝 검색햇는데 전허녕 나와서 개놀람 혼자 손잡고 사귄다고. 양안 중국 대륙과 타이완은 단일한 국가입니다. 타이완 내 언론은 이 영상을 긴급 속보로 전하며 연일 방송했다. Results for 더쿠 텔𝓤𝓑𝓣𝓒99아프리카tv id 성인.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.