Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

관리자가 퍼지데이열어서 10시40분에 갈비탕먹다가 쏟아서팔에 바느질22방하고 알등이됨. 펨치갤이 숲이라는 플랫폼을 싫어한다고 게시글 쓰는거 보면 선동도 아니고 진짜 그렇게 생각하나보네 걔들이 싫어하는. 설명 원래는 하루에 한 페이지도 못채울 정도로 활성화가. 시작 에푸쏘 발전 대보라시대와 비제이들의 지속적인 언급과 탐방미래는 알수없지만관리자님들의 노고와 클린유저들의 자정작용 덕분에발전적인.

04 1707 지금 어딘가에 히든같은거 숨었을확률은 제로임.. Com › 7654333538마크 관심없고 롤만 보는 롤대남인데 숲 soop 에펨코리아.. 16 이벤트 백사 조회550 추천49..

수영복인 그 아이 히토미

남의 게시판에서도 굴까는글 올리면 영차먹이고 다니는 진성 굴단이라 일부러 쉬쉬하고 입닫고 죽은듯 살다가 오늘 허니즈그룹 ㅡ 피닉스박 으로 이어지는 컨텐츠 탈출.. 01 0023 펨방갤 구경하다가 주워왔다..

소소년 Ppv

소은이 나이 디시

숲갤그림판 스포츠중계 방송후기 방송정리 음성지원 방송홍보 공지 이벤트. Com › community › boardㅇㅇㄱ 펨코 본체가 숲갤이라면 ㅋㅋㅋ 루리웹, 카나비 lck 원하는 팬들 근들근들 레츠고. 펨치갤이 숲이라는 플랫폼을 싫어한다고 게시글 쓰는거 보면 선동도 아니고 진짜 그렇게 생각하나보네 걔들이 싫어하는.

이미지 형식 잡담 사진영상 정보일정 뻐꾸기 숲갤그림판 스포츠중계 방송후기 방송정리 음성지원 방송홍보 공지 이벤트 대문요청. 숲갤그림판 스포츠중계 방송후기 방송정리 음성지원 방송홍보 공지 이벤트. Com › 8613908959대충 눈팅하면서 분위기 살펴보니까 숲 soop 에펨코리아. 유르님이 이정도로 관심을 많이 받을 정도인가요, 남의 게시판에서도 굴까는글 올리면 영차먹이고 다니는 진성 굴단이라 일부러 쉬쉬하고 입닫고 죽은듯 살다가 오늘 허니즈그룹 ㅡ 피닉스박 으로 이어지는 컨텐츠 탈출.

16 1227 드디어 숲갤이 아이돌갤로 변했구나. 잡담 사진영상 정보일정 뻐꾸기 숲갤그림판 스포츠중계 방송후기 방송정리 음성지원 방송홍보 공지 이벤트. 펨숲갤보니까 우리형 동안 소리가 많이나오노 스타대학 와이고수, 근데 숲이라는 플랫폼과 이계돌이라는 bj는 별개인데 왜 숲 가지고도 저러는거임.

섹트 국

Com › mini › board펨숲갤 감스트팬카페 숲인방 미니 갤러리. 남의 게시판에서도 굴까는글 올리면 영차먹이고 다니는 진성 굴단이라 일부러 쉬쉬하고 입닫고 죽은듯 살다가 오늘 허니즈그룹 ㅡ 피닉스박 으로 이어지는 컨텐츠 탈출, 으냉이, 이라333, 모모타 미츠키 같은 이런 안경쓴 귀여운 여자들이 요즘 대세인가봐. 숲갤그림판 스포츠중계 방송후기 방송정리 음성지원 방송홍보 공지 감스트 태양 펨붕이 댓글 개웃기네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 14 첨부파일.

치지직 과 관련하여 이야기를 나누는 에펨코리아의 게시판. 드디어 숲갤이 아이돌갤로 변했구나 숲soop. 공지 에펨코리아 숲soop 게시판 통합공지. 숲갤그림판 스포츠중계 방송후기 방송정리 음성지원 방송홍보 공지 아침 펨붕이들 있나 57, 치지직 과 관련하여 이야기를 나누는 에펨코리아의 게시판.

명시규정은 없는거 같고일주일 보름 한달. 시작 에푸쏘 발전 대보라시대와 비제이들의 지속적인 언급과 탐방미래는 알수없지만관리자님들의 노고와 클린유저들의 자정작용 덕분에발전적인, Com 마병대 시즌2 참가하는 감스트 前 크루 멤버들 정리스타대학 바스포드박삐삐퐁퐁서버 신과함께딸기. 남의 게시판에서도 굴까는글 올리면 영차먹이고 다니는 진성 굴단이라 일부러 쉬쉬하고 입닫고 죽은듯 살다가 오늘 허니즈그룹 ㅡ 피닉스박 으로 이어지는 컨텐츠 탈출. 으냉이, 이라333, 모모타 미츠키 같은 이런 안경쓴 귀여운 여자들이 요즘 대세인가봐.

숲갤은 네모세상이랑 gta이야기중이였는데 아니 스갤은 포텐에서 맨날, 펨숲갤 게시판 관리자가 굴전관전체관리자임. 16 이벤트 백사 조회550 추천49.

수원2nb 펨숲갤 철구 공지조회수가 10만이네 1 sasin12 minerals 3,646,809 level 준장 20250422 235153 28일 전 read 237. 숲갤그림판 스포츠중계 방송후기 방송정리 음성지원 방송홍보 공지 감스트 태양 펨붕이 댓글 개웃기네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 14 첨부파일. 걔네들 화력으로도 격추 못한게 있을 정도로 미움받는 거냐고 www. Soop 세구 펨숲갤 방문기록 찍혀있는거 몬데요. 이미지 형식 잡담 사진영상 정보일정 뻐꾸기 숲갤그림판 스포츠중계 방송후기 방송정리 음성지원 방송홍보 공지 이벤트 노래방. 수탉 중고차 딜러 유튜브 디시

쇼당몰 잡담 사진영상 정보일정 뻐꾸기 숲갤그림판 스포츠중계 방송후기 방송정리 음성지원 방송홍보 공지 이벤트. 펨숲갤보니까 우리형 동안 소리가 많이나오노 스타대학 와이고수. 저기 관리자중 한명이마왕루야 팬됐네 ㅋㅋㅋ씹 ㅈㄴ 든든하노 ㅋㅋㅋ원래 저 닉 아니었던걸로 기억하는데심지어 방송. 남의 게시판에서도 굴까는글 올리면 영차먹이고 다니는 진성 굴단이라 일부러 쉬쉬하고 입닫고 죽은듯 살다가 오늘 허니즈그룹 ㅡ 피닉스박 으로 이어지는 컨텐츠 탈출. 16 1227 드디어 숲갤이 아이돌갤로 변했구나. 세토 칸나 섹스

소추 남편 16 이벤트 백사 조회550 추천49. 대ㅡ수ㅡ트하던 새끼들이라 그런가 뭔 열혈을 펨코에서 빨아주냐ㅅㅂㅋㅋ. Com 마병대 시즌2 참가하는 감스트 前 크루 멤버들 정리스타대학 바스포드박삐삐퐁퐁서버 신과함께딸기. 이미지 형식 잡담 사진영상 정보일정 뻐꾸기 숲갤그림판 스포츠중계 방송후기 방송정리 음성지원 방송홍보 공지 이벤트 대문요청. 에펨코리아 펨‪코‬ 4+ 종합 게시판 커뮤니‪티‬ fmkorea designed for ipad. 소니쇼 시그니엘

손밍 온팬 펨숲갤보니까 우리형 동안 소리가 많이나오노 스타대학 와이고수. 04 1707 지금 어딘가에 히든같은거 숨었을확률은 제로임. 카나비 lck 원하는 팬들 근들근들 레츠고. 명시규정은 없는거 같고일주일 보름 한달. 말하는 것 부터 피싸개식 화법임 하던데 흠 아닌가 찐따새끼마냥 대화는 못하고 근거없는 헛소리만 씨부리고 ㅇㅇ.

섹트 유빈이 Com › community › boardㅇㅇㄱ 펨코 본체가 숲갤이라면 ㅋㅋㅋ 루리웹. Com › mini › board펨숲갤 감스트팬카페 숲인방 미니 갤러리. 숲 soop 잡담 인기글 목록 2025. 이건 펨숲갤 관리자의 경고 공지인데 펨코에는 포를 뿌리는 이벤트를 열수있음 그 글의 추천수가 뿌리는 포보다 높으면 포빨이가 되므로 규정상 금지임 그런데 이세돌 멜론9위로 순간 화력이 너무세서. 걔네들 화력으로도 격추 못한게 있을 정도로 미움받는 거냐고 www.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.