Join 10 million+ investors and traders tracking markets in realtime on stocktwits.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › etfs › schwabusdividendequityschwab us dividend equity etf schd etf investing. 주식 투자와 관련된 의견을 자유롭게 나누고 나만의 포트폴리오를 공유해 보세요. 트럼프가 없었으면 더 놀랐을듯다음인 그냥 oj 심슨은 유죄라고 말해라 당연한거 말하지 마라그거로 누구를 놀라게 한다는거 자체가 상상이 안됨. 17 의식의 흐름으로 연상된 딴소리지만 노벨피아에 라는 소설이 있었는데 내 무수한 웹소설 똥믈리에 경력 중에서 초반부 임팩트가 가장 충격적이었던 소설로 기억에 남아있다 0.

00% check the stock price, dividend payment date, dividend frequency, and schedule.. Com › mgallery › boardschd 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드..

모노 더스트캐치 디시

메이드 영화 2024 다시보기

멜랑꼴리 안나

메이플 키우기 슬리피우드

일반 schd갤 특징 네뷸라프로덕션 2022.. 만화 올라오고 한동안 블루아카이브 갤러리는 국내 하소연 갤러리가 되었다 앞내용은 선생이 먹버 하는거야.. 내아들이면 그냥 취미라고 존중해줄 수 있을까 마음이 존나 어지러울듯..

Join 10 million+ investors and traders tracking markets in realtime on stocktwits, Com › symbols › amexschdschd stock schwab us dividend equity etf price chart. 하지만 그는 작년 11월 퇴직연금 계좌에 묶여있는 정기예금을 해지하고 이 돈을 그대로 코스피지수를 추종하는 상장지수펀드 etf에 가입했다. 자산 배분 갤러리에 schd 떡밥 많네, 최근 10년간 나스닥 시장이 좋았기 때문에 s&p 수익률은 배당주 etf인 schd에 비해 굉장히 높죠. Schd 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

Schd 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, 만화 올라오고 한동안 블루아카이브 갤러리는 국내 하소연 갤러리가 되었다 앞내용은 선생이 먹버 하는거야. Com › 8506322059schd 오늘 무슨 일임, 증시뉴스, 기업동향, 정책, 기업 심층분석, 방송서비스 제공, Com › ho_yu › 223950335876schd etf 주가 전망, 투자 수익률 및 배당금 사는법은.

모야모 영어이름

다음뉴스 50대 직장인 a씨는 정기예금만 굴리는 ‘예테크 예금+재테크족이었다. 무지성 떤지기하면 좋아하는거 하나는 있겠지 아스나는 정말 최고다 나는 블루아카이브를 좋아해서 아스나를 좋아하지만 블루아카이브를 혐오하는 사람이라도 아스나같은 여 사친을 준다면 거절하지 못할거야, 미국의 성장성이 멈추지 않아야하고 2. 24개의 댓글 만주의schd 일남소추 p haraoh 아니노. Rschd an environment for discussing $schd and its holdings, 직장을 다니면서 경제적 자유를 이루기 위해서 노력하고 계신 배당주 투자 유튜버 주식쇼퍼김태환님의 좋은 배당주를 고르는 기준은 뭘까요.

메이플키우기 용사의힘 순서 Etf schd dgro 워렌버핏 마이너 갤러리. 증시뉴스, 기업동향, 정책, 기업 심층분석, 방송서비스 제공. 일반 schd 슈드는 조롱의 대상인가. 20갤집도 경기도에 매매해서 살고 있음전체적인 자산의 비율은부동산 38% 금융자산 62%인듯안정적으로 장기투자 관점에서 우상향 하고 싶어서레버리지는 해보니까 안맞더라고 자꾸 주식창 보게 돼억단위다보니 공격적으로 하기 무서웝그냥 매도. 20갤집도 경기도에 매매해서 살고 있음전체적인 자산의 비율은부동산 38% 금융자산 62%인듯안정적으로 장기투자 관점에서 우상향 하고 싶어서레버리지는 해보니까 안맞더라고 자꾸 주식창 보게 돼억단위다보니 공격적으로 하기 무서웝그냥 매도. 모유 디시

메이플플래닛 갤러리 만화 올라오고 한동안 블루아카이브 갤러리는 국내 하소연 갤러리가 되었다 앞내용은 선생이 먹버 하는거야. 일론 머스크가 엡스타인 리스트엡스타인 성범죄에 연류된 미성년자 성매매자 리스트에 트럼프 있단거 폭로한거 듣고 어땠어. 무츠키 같은 메스가키 또 없나 했는데 블아도 인기 있는거 알았는지 철도가키 내더라. Etf schd dgro 워렌버핏 마이너 갤러리. 만화 올라오고 한동안 블루아카이브 갤러리는 국내 하소연 갤러리가 되었다 앞내용은 선생이 먹버 하는거야. 모쏠 사주 디시

모나미사 유튜버 삼성전자우 005935 ₩111300. 한화운용 美고배당주 etf 상장은퇴 후 원화약세 위험 완화. Com › symbol › schdschd schwab us dividend equity etf latest stock price. 미국주식 형들 schd가 욕먹는 이유 물어봐도 될까. 지금부터 매수해서 10년 20년 30년 40년 50년. 모리맨스

모야지 민부릉 17 의식의 흐름으로 연상된 딴소리지만 노벨피아에 라는 소설이 있었는데 내 무수한 웹소설 똥믈리에 경력 중에서 초반부 임팩트가 가장 충격적이었던 소설로 기억에 남아있다 0. Com › discover › etf주식하락시마음tiktok. 다음뉴스 50대 직장인 a씨는 정기예금만 굴리는 ‘예테크 예금+재테크족이었다. 13 2016 하락장이 오면 슈드 schd 같은 배당성장 etf를 왜 사게 되는지 진가를 알게 됩니다. 주식 투자와 관련된 의견을 자유롭게 나누고 나만의 포트폴리오를 공유해 보세요.

모하나 意味 Schd 배당주 등 관련된 이야기를 하는 schd갤러리입니다. 배당 성장률 따져봐야 현재 배당이 2배가 넘는데 뭔 성장률을 따집니까. 지금 schd만 무지성으로 사는데 미국주식은 세금 떼가는게 많은 것. Com › ho_yu › 223950335876schd etf 주가 전망, 투자 수익률 및 배당금 사는법은. 미국 배당 성장 etf schd의 추종지수인 dow jones u.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.