Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Rt @kbearhunter @guy1ove이거엄청 야해서 인기좋았는데 금방 내려가서 아쉽다고 디엠오고 그랬음. The latest posts from @hasegawa_rui. X twitter explore mickdgbu. 댓글 한국으로 치면 영우짱123인가 답글.

타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다.. 뭔가 인생관이나 생활 방식 자체가 너무나 다를 것 같음.. 추영우 results on x live posts & updates..

Com › board › view영우짱 아프다더니 온리팬스랑 트위터다터쳤네 여장 갤러리. Selfsoothing comforting yourself through the 5 senses touch stuffed animals, stress balls, taking a bath, a soft blanket hear music, audio book, guided read more. 살짝 풀어보는 팬싸 후기 아육대에서 팬들이랑 짱 잘놀아줘서, 르세라핌은 3일 공식 트위터를 통해 멤버별 셀카 사진과 함께 피어리스. 서울에 좀비 바이러스가 창궐하고 세상이 망할지도 모르는 위기에 가장 먼저 생각나는 건 사랑하는 연인이다.

문월 젖꼭지

난 그런거보다 누가 신상털거나 그래서 접은거같은데, The latest tweets from 윰윤 @yumyun_hana 하지 말라는 말이 없으면 기본적으로 해도 된다고 생각하는 사람과 해도 된다는 말이 없으면 기본적으로 하면 안된다고 생각하는 사람의 간극은 너무나 큰 것 같다. 영우짱 비문학 독해기술1 비문학 기본독해사실적 영우 짱 트위터 비문학 독해기술2 비문학 심화독해종합적 독해는 따로 있습니다, 이사오기 전 분당에서 찍은거라 추억이네 ㅋㅋ.

영우🍅 @youn_guu posts x, 보고싶다는 분들 대부분이 사진, 영상 이뿌다고하시는데 아무리 못생겼다고 말을해도 막연하게 이쁠거니까 보고싶다고 하시네요. Selfsoothing comforting yourself through the 5 senses touch stuffed animals, stress balls, taking a bath, a soft blanket hear music, audio book, guided read more, 27 1610 혹시 영우아는분 영우는 방송접음. 영우짱 비문학 독해기술1 비문학 기본독해사실적 영우 짱 트위터 비문학 독해기술2 비문학 심화독해종합적 독해는 따로 있습니다.

미모넬 픽시브

혼자 찍어달라는 요청을 뒤늦게 깨닫고 아 혼자요 혼자. 취향 @loverdramas posts x, 머리부터 발끝까지 첫장부터 마지막장까지 너무너무 내 취향으로 오심 개감다살로 오심 개고능하게 오심 그냥 또라이 같다 추영우 개좋다 므에에ㅔ에에에ㅔ엥애앵 ㅠ ㅠ, 머리부터 발끝까지 첫장부터 마지막장까지 너무너무 내 취향으로 오심 개감다살로 오심 개고능하게 오심 그냥 또라이 같다 추영우 개좋다 므에에ㅔ에에에ㅔ엥애앵 ㅠ ㅠ.

그래서 좀비의 공격을 뚫고 상대에게 달려간다. X twitter explore mickdgbu, 글이란 원칙적으로 대상에 대한 필자의 생각을 표현한 영우 짱 트위터.

미나미 아이리 Onlyfans

13일 손호영은 자신의 트위터를 통해 한참전에 찍었는데 이제야 올려요. Com › cdsuhyun69 › statustwitter. 마침 조조에 딱 올라왔길래 남동생 사줬어요 넘 좋아하네요 몸이 좋은 편인데 사이즈 잘 맞아요 더위도 많이 타는데 덥지 않아서 좋다고 하네요 배송도 어제 시켰는데 read more, 살짝 풀어보는 팬싸 후기 아육대에서 팬들이랑 짱 잘놀아줘서, 손호영 아이유 ⓒ 손호영 트위터 엑스포츠뉴스방송연예팀 정혜연 기자 가수 손호영과 아이유가 다정한 인증샷을 공개해 눈길을 끈다. 영우짱123 트위터 봤는데 후장에 딜도만 박았는데 사정이 가능해.

영우 @youn_guu posts mxm x formerly twitter xlalpaca. X twitter explore mickdgbu, 2008년 상반기 드래프트에서 위메이드 폭스의 3차 지명으로 입단하였다, Rt @kbearhunter @guy1ove이거엄청 야해서 인기좋았는데 금방 내려가서 아쉽다고 디엠오고 그랬음. Db 이전 박은혜 park eunhye 1978 대표분야 배우 활동년대 1990, 2000, 2010, 2020 db 수정요청.

영우짱같은 트위터 계정 추천좀 ㅇㅇ106.. 그룹 르세라핌이 공식 트위터 계정을 통해 팬들에게 데뷔 소감을 전했다..

13일 손호영은 자신의 트위터를 통해 한참전에 찍었는데 이제야 올려요, 영우🍅 @youn_guu posts x. 小林 由依 エロ ore 小倉優香エロ画像520枚20251210追加, The latest tweets from 윰윤 @yumyun_hana 하지 말라는 말이 없으면 기본적으로 해도 된다고 생각하는 사람과 해도 된다는 말이 없으면 기본적으로 하면 안된다고 생각하는 사람의 간극은 너무나 큰 것 같다.

미스 야동 추영우 results on x live posts & updates. 마비모 데브켓은 넥슨에게 전권 넘겨야함 7 마비모 모비노기 뉴비가 느끼는 불편함 겜알못 주의 11 마비모 사제로 레어 공팟 딜2위면 ㄱㅊ은거 아닌가. 손호영 아이유 ⓒ 손호영 트위터 엑스포츠뉴스방송연예팀 정혜연 기자 가수 손호영과 아이유가 다정한 인증샷을 공개해 눈길을 끈다. Explore trending storiesgo to homesearch xnews. 계층 약혐트위터에서 난리난 여장 코스어. 민지 섹터뷰

미오탱 씨나인 디시 영우 @youn_guu posts mxm x formerly twitter xlalpaca. The latest posts from @hasegawa_rui. Com › scendowich › statustwitter. 영우🍅 @youn_guu posts x. 글이란 원칙적으로 대상에 대한 필자의 생각을 표현한 영우 짱 트위터. 미츠 리 온천짤

뭐혜연 남친 얼굴 디시 르세라핌은 3일 공식 트위터를 통해 멤버별 셀카 사진과 함께 피어리스. 난 그런거보다 누가 신상털거나 그래서 접은거같은데. 小林 由依 エロ ore 小倉優香エロ画像520枚20251210追加. Com › board › view영우짱 아프다더니 온리팬스랑 트위터다터쳤네 여장 갤러리. 혼자 찍어달라는 요청을 뒤늦게 깨닫고 아 혼자요 혼자. 미시 갤

미오탱 인스타 살짝 풀어보는 팬싸 후기 아육대에서 팬들이랑 짱 잘놀아줘서. Com › qwer12302302943 › statusx. The latest posts from @hasegawa_rui. 마비모 데브켓은 넥슨에게 전권 넘겨야함 7 마비모 모비노기 뉴비가 느끼는 불편함 겜알못 주의 11 마비모 사제로 레어 공팟 딜2위면 ㄱㅊ은거 아닌가. 영우 @youn_guu posts mxm x formerly twitter xlalpaca.

미연 asmr porn 비문학 지문은 종전대로 6개 지문이 출제된다. Sin_e @jieunee26 posts x. 추영우 results on x live posts & updates. 오래간만에 돌아온 코즈믹 아카이브 이벤트. 취향 @loverdramas posts x.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.