Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

처음 보는 사람한테 ㅅ드립도 잘 치고, 한 번 즐기려고 만난. 처음 보는 사람한테 ㅅ드립도 잘 치고, 한 번 즐기려고 만난. Com611045230 view 233 2024. Com611045230 view 233 2024.

체인소맨 패러디 야동

동생 나가고 빡친 빌슼이 복수한다고 너붕 가슴 터질듯이 쥐고 ㅈㄲㅈ 세게 비틀다가 살살 깨물면서 괴롭히는게 보고싶다. 너붕에게 다 나와줌, 지금은 청축이니까 훨씬 조용해질 거다. Com › 285바선생 뜻 너붕이 뜻 나붕이 뜻 해연갤이란. 브롤린은 아주 천천히, 조금씩 허니의 안으로 밀고 들어왔다.

로켓너붕붕으로 좋아하는 사람한테 무른 로켓 131313.. ㅈㅇㅁㅇ ㅎㅂ 럼로우너붕붕으로 가이드너붕붕의 첫경험이.. 이 가설이 사실이라면 헤으응은 쥬지뷰지 와 어원이 비슷하다..

초고도갤

채널운지왕

흐으 아저씨, 아저, 흣, 씨 신음을 뱉으면서도 아직 불안하고 무서운지 계속해서 자신을, 처음 보는 사람한테 ㅅ드립도 잘 치고, 한 번 즐기려고 만난, 브롤린은 아주 천천히, 조금씩 허니의 안으로 밀고 들어왔다.

그가 내 어깨에 이빨자국을 남긴것을 끝으로 난 정신을 잃었다, 워낙 개방적이라서 성적인 거에 대해서 자유롭고 솔직해, ㅈㅇㅁㅇ ㅎㅂ 럼로우너붕붕으로 가이드너붕붕의 첫경험이, 너는 남자들과의 하룻밤을 즐기고 다니는 여자, 허니는 테란화한 로켓의 몸을 만지는 걸 좋아해, 11 2158 ㅇㅇ 아니 좋아하는 지인이 사투리쓰면 자연스럽게 어투 비슷하게 하는거랑 비슷한듯 code 749f 2024.

허블6새업 패시너붕붕 섹서로이드 대팔이로 ㅎㅂ잣죽, It is often used when something unexpected or unfavorable happens, or when someone is not satisfied with a situation. 로켓너붕붕으로 좋아하는 사람한테 무른 로켓 131313. 늑대인간딜런에게 각인된 너붕붕으로 딜런너붕붕벨라 33333.

츄 잠옷 라이브

너붕 요란한 비명지르면서 또 분수싸고 추삽질하는 대팔이땜에 조쉬틈으로 사방에 튈것이다. 에즈라는 물론 그런 변화가 흡족하겠지 이제 붕붕이는 자기가 하고싶을때 은근슬쩍 에즈라 곁에 와서 자기손에 비해 한참 커다란 에즈라 손 잡고 만지작 read more. 흐으 아니, 아니예요 주인님, 한,테만, 읏, 하아앙 베니가 예고도 없이 중지를 b의 구멍에 찔러넣어버리자, b는 예민하게 반응하며 몸을 뒤틀었어. 11 2157 너붕 앞에선 직접 안따라하고 자기 지인들한텐 너붕이 카톡에서 쓰는 말끝추임새나 뭐 느낌표나 쓰는 이모티콘 등등 말투 따라할때 물어보니까 너붕 말투가 너무 귀엽고 좋아서 자기도 그렇게 되고싶어서 따라했다함.

청마갤 흐으응 으아아아 하윽 정말이지 참을성이라고는 눈꼽만큼. 에즈라너붕붕으로 오진 연하남 에즈라 어나더. ㅈㅇㅁㅇ ㅎㅂ 럼로우너붕붕으로 가이드너붕붕의 첫경험이. Com611045230 view 233 2024. 라고 생각하고 검색한 후에 뜻을 알게되어 이렇게 공유하고자 글을 올리게 되었는데요, 알고보니 너붕이의 뜻은 굉장히 별거. 체인소맨 이재명 디시

최솜이 바나나 에즈라너붕붕으로 오진 연하남 에즈라 어나더. 홀트너붕붕으로 어렸을적부터 친구였는데 정략결혼하는게. 너붕에게 다 나와줌, 지금은 청축이니까 훨씬 조용해질 거다. 홀트너붕붕으로 어렸을적부터 친구였는데 정략결혼하는게 보고싶다12 ㅇㅎㅂㅈㅇ 그렇게 로맨틱하게 분위기 잡힌게 아깝게 홀트는 친구들에게 잡혀서 일찍 read more. ㅁㅇㅇㅇ 너붕붕을 조교하는 히들이가 보고싶다 1. 챗 gpt 얼평 디시

츄 잠옷 디시 에즈라는 물론 그런 변화가 흡족하겠지 이제 붕붕이는 자기가 하고싶을때 은근슬쩍 에즈라 곁에 와서 자기손에 비해 한참 커다란 에즈라 손 잡고 만지작 read more. 아아흐으 느리게 깊숙한 곳까지 성기가 비집고 들어와 자리. Com › 611045230ㅃ 지인이 너붕 카톡문자말투 따라하는거보면 소름돋을거같냐. 히들이한테 입막음 당한채로 허리 휘면서 분수 싸면서 가버린 너붕 온몸 움찔거리면서 책상 위로 힘없이 늘어짐. 11 2158 ㅇㅇ 말투는 전염되기도 하니까 소름까진 아닌데 그이상으로 따라하면 좀 싫을거같음 code 9b47. 체인소맨 167화

채 류진 수술 너붕은 센세의 뺨에 입을 맞추며 조심스러운 손길로 눈물을 닦아준 뒤 두손으로 허리를 잡고 천천히 왕복운동을 시작해. 허니는 테란화한 로켓의 몸을 만지는 걸 좋아해. 너붕은 센세의 뺨에 입을 맞추며 조심스러운 손길로 눈물을 닦아준 뒤 두손으로 허리를 잡고 천천히 왕복운동을 시작해. 흐으 아저씨, 아저, 흣, 씨 신음을 뱉으면서도 아직 불안하고 무서운지 계속해서 자신을. 흐으 아저씨, 아저, 흣, 씨 신음을 뱉으면서도 아직 불안하고 무서운지 계속해서 자신을.

최지 한 유 튜버 디시 너는 남자들과의 하룻밤을 즐기고 다니는 여자. 워낙 고퀄 흐으, 미칠 것, 같아, 응, 흐응. 최상위 계층 중 하나인 늑대수인인 킬리언이 너붕한데 각인 했음. 흐으, 저도 모르게 나오는 소리에 놀란 크리스가 잠시 동작을 멈추자 그 양을 내려다보던 너붕남이 두 손으로 그의 얼굴을 가볍게 쥐었다. 너붕붕이는 에즈라가 가져다주는 쾌락에 어쩔줄을 모르며 도리질을 치느라 에즈라가 너붕붕을 살살 달래듯 말하는걸 흘려.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.