The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 12, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 12, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 12, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 12, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 12, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 12, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 12, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 12, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 12, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 12, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 12, 2026.
키가 크고 잘생겼고 나한테 너무 잘해준다. 화정은 지난해 11월 열혈회장 팬클럽 회장과 결혼에 골인했다. 사진bj 화정 이예진 기자 leeyj0124@xportsnews. 화정은 2013년 부터 지금까지 별다른 스캔들이나 구설수 없이 꾸준하게 인터넷 방송을 지금까지 활동 하고 있습니다.
오늘의 지구인 septem 아프리카 3대여캠이라는 누나의 남편 조건ㄷㄷㄷ dailymini, 결혼 준비할 때 나보다 더 열심히 챙기고, 더 나를 아껴준 신랑에게 고마운 마음을, 하긴 서울이니깐 수월하게 많이오긴하겠구나 2023, Bj화정 화정결혼 아프리카tv 결혼 아윤금화화정3대여캠 공감한 사람 보러가기 댓글0공유하기 이웃추가 바다만큼 스타연예인이웃3,304명.사진bj 화정 이예진 기자 leeyj0124@xportsnews.. 그는 2022년 11월 열혈회장 팬클럽 회장과 부부의 연을 맺었다.. 55k views 3 years ago.. Com › world_biz › 223754686286깜짝 결혼 발표한 미모의 bj, 모두가 놀랐다는 예비 신랑의 정체..
18 2103 수니그룹 남순 오늘의 비서 류하 ㅗㅜㅑ, 한편 화정은 1995년 생으로 2013년 bj로 데뷔했다, 화정은 2013년 부터 지금까지 별다른 스캔들이나 구설수 없이 꾸준하게 인터넷 방송을 지금까지 활동 하고 있습니다, 한편 화정은 1995년 생으로 2013년 bj로 데뷔했다.
오늘의 지구인 septem 아프리카 3대여캠이라는 누나의 남편 조건ㄷㄷㄷ dailymini. 2013년 bj로 데뷔해 bj 아윤, 금화와 함께 아프리카tv 3대 여캠으로 알려지며 인기를 모았다. 결혼 준비할 때 나보다 더 열심히 챙기고, 더 나를 아껴준 신랑에게 ayoon. 노빠꾸 탁재훈에 bj 아윤 이라는 여자가 나왔는데 시집가고 싶은 남자 탕탕맨 2024. 덩이 시집갑니다라고 하며 결혼 사실을 공개했다.
24 152502 조회 55656 추천 546 댓글 539 3. Bj 아윤, 금화와 함께 아프리카tv 3대 여캠으로 활약했다, 엑스포츠뉴스 이예진 기자 아프리카 여신으로 불리는 bj 화정이 웨딩 사진을 재업로드했다. 36 1422 45 1 4513365 일반 하데스 관련 글쓸때 유의할점 숲요정218. 화정은 1995년 생으로 만 나이 28세다.
화정은 결혼을 굳이 미룰 이유가 없었다, 화정은 2013년 부터 지금까지 별다른 스캔들이나 구설수 없이 꾸준하게 인터넷 방송을 지금까지 활동 하고 있습니다, 방송을 열심히 안 하게 되면서 예전만큼은 아니게 됐지만, 물론 전체에선 여전히 잘 받는 편이다 read more.
올림머리를 한 채 티아라를 쓰고 단아한 분위기를 자아내고 있어 눈길을 끈다. 인사이트 정현태 기자 아윤, 금화와 함께 아프리카tv 3대 여캠으로 꼽히는 bj가 팬들을 놀라게 할 소식을 알렸다. Septem 아프리카 3대여캠이라는 누나의 남편 조건ㄷㄷㄷ awesomeworld. 이날 여성 bj 아윤이 깜짝 게스트로 초대돼 김택용을 놀라게 했다, 직접 찾아뵙고 인사드리는 게 맞지만 오랜만에 드리는 연락이 결혼 소식이라 괜히 조심스럽고 망설였던 분들도 많아요, 김택용을 설레게 했던 아윤과의 재회, 군입대 하루전 역사는.
twitterdotnet 사진bj 화정 이예진 기자 leeyj0124@xportsnews. 남편은 30대의 직업 사업가로 알려졌다. 18 2103 수니그룹 남순 오늘의 비서 류하 ㅗㅜㅑ. 노빠꾸 탁재훈에 bj 아윤 이라는 여자가 나왔는데 시집가고 싶은 남자 탕탕맨 2024. 화정은 결혼을 굳이 미룰 이유가 없었다. twitter ipa
wtwt320 특히 지난 2022년, 자신의 팬클럽 회장열혈 팬과 결혼하며. 그는 2022년 11월 열혈회장 팬클럽 회장과 부부의 연을 맺었다. 김택용을 설레게 했던 아윤과의 재회, 군입대 하루전 역사는. Likes, 0 comments equal_commerce on decem. 한편 화정은 1995년 생으로 2013년 bj로 데뷔했다. twitter動画保存ランキング河北彩花
www.avkuy.org Com › world_biz › 223754686286깜짝 결혼 발표한 미모의 bj, 모두가 놀랐다는 예비 신랑의 정체. 방송을 열심히 안 하게 되면서 예전만큼은 아니게 됐지만, 물론 전체에선 여전히 잘 받는 편이다 read more. Bj화정 화정결혼 아프리카tv 결혼 아윤금화화정3대여캠 공감한 사람 보러가기 댓글0공유하기 이웃추가 바다만큼 스타연예인이웃3,304명. 인사이트 정현태 기자 아윤, 금화와 함께 아프리카tv 3대 여캠으로 꼽히는 bj가 팬들을 놀라게 할 소식을 알렸다. 그런류 bj랑 진심으로 결혼하고 싶어하는사람이있나. what is bonds 2 by iqos
tw stalker ibu 13, bj아윤 편 입니다모든 영상은 풀영상으로. Kr 아프리카 여캠 1티어라고 불리는 bj아윤과 결혼하는 조건ㄷㄷㄷ 아프리카 여캠 1티어라고 불리는 bj아윤과 결혼하는 조건ㄷㄷㄷ 1 like comment share. 25 1934 nsu 류하 찢검 오피스룩 전신샷. 노빠꾸 탁재훈에 bj 아윤 이라는 여자가 나왔는데 시집가고 싶은 남자 탕탕맨 2024. 특히 지난 2022년, 자신의 팬클럽 회장열혈 팬과 결혼하며.
twivideo.ney 인사이트 정현태 기자 아윤, 금화와 함께 아프리카tv 3대 여캠으로 꼽히는 bj가 팬들을 놀라게 할 소식을 알렸다. 특히 지난 2022년, 자신의 팬클럽 회장열혈 팬과 결혼하며. 과거 별풍선 후원 순위가 매번 상위권에 위치했었다. 그래서 이 남자와 결혼하지 않을 이유가 없었다고 남편을 향한 애정을 드러냈다. 2013년 bj로 데뷔해 bj 아윤, 금화와 함께 아프리카tv 3대 여캠으로 알려지며 인기를 모았다.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 12, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 12, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 12, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 12, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
노빠꾸 탁재훈에 bj 아윤 이라는 여자가 나왔는데 시집가고 싶은 남자 탕탕맨 2024., Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.
