버스기사 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

버스 기사버스技士, bus driverbus operatorbus captain는 버스를 운전하는 일을 직업으로 삼는 사람이다. 2018 2020경기 시내 1년, 광역 1년으로 총 2년하고 때려치고 현직됐는데ㅈㄴ 건강했는데 버스 2년하고 몸 축나서 아직도 몸 이곳저곳 겔겔거림특히 허리가 십창나서 아직도. 이렇게만 따도 검정고시 고졸에 무스팩인 재가 버스. Com › board › driverredirecting to sgall.

Com › Mgallery › Board내가느낀 버스기사 장단점 버스기사 마이너 갤러리.

버스기사 마이너 설정 New 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 Ai 이미지 간편 등록new 버스기사가 흑화해 가는 과정 호수공원 2024.

Com › Board › View9개월간의 버스기사 생활을 Rewind 해보자 Hit 갤러리.

1135, 1112버스 기사님 칭찬합니다.. 일정한 루틴에 맞춰 근무하는 만큼 생활 패턴을 맞추는 것도 중요한데요.. 버스기사는 안정성과 수요가 꾸준한 직업이지만, 체력과 집중력을 요하는 일입니다.. Redirecting to sgall..

내친구도 버스기사 하는데 저렇게 비번날은 고속버스 대타 나가고 저럼 세후 4000정도되는데 난 회사 상여포함해서 5200정도 받는데도 부럽더라 ㅅㅂ 기술하지말고 운전할껄 그랫나.

Com › community › board본인 버스기사 해보려다 걍 포기함 루리웹. 자격증 따는데 대략 며칠이거나 어떤식으로 하는지, 난이도가 궁금함. 23일 mbc에서 방송된 나 혼자 산다에서는 김대호가 이른 아침 청량리 역 앞에 섰다.

버스타본지 10년 넘어서 모르겠음 자차 없는 하층민이나 타는거 아님. 내친구도 버스기사 하는데 저렇게 비번날은 고속버스 대타 나가고 저럼 세후 4000정도되는데 난 회사 상여포함해서 5200정도 받는데도 부럽더라 ㅅㅂ 기술하지말고 운전할껄 그랫나. 1135, 1112버스 기사님 칭찬합니다. 자격증 따는데 대략 며칠이거나 어떤식으로 하는지, 난이도가 궁금함.

버스기사 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 1번에 언급한 심리와 비슷한데 아주 악질인 새끼들임, 그 꿈을 9년만에 이룬 21살의 나는 세상을 다 가진 기분이었음, 23일 mbc에서 방송된 나 혼자 산다에서는 김대호가 이른 아침 청량리 역 앞에 섰다.

버스 기사버스技士, bus driverbus operatorbus captain는 버스를 운전하는 일을 직업으로 삼는 사람이다.. 솔직히 말해서 버스기사는 정말 좋은 직업이야.. Com › mgallery › board버스기사의 현실 운전직 마이너 갤러리..

승객 신고로 버스 기사가 사직한 사연을 알아보세요. 1번에 언급한 심리와 비슷한데 아주 악질인 새끼들임. 운행중 일어난일 관련 게시물은 환영, 갤러리와 맞지않는 게시물은 예고없이 삭제되며, 입문, 취업 관련글 운수업 구인구직 갤러리 이용 바랍니다. 버스운전기사 시작해보고싶은데 혹시 여러분은 어트게. 버스타본지 10년 넘어서 모르겠음 자차 없는 하층민이나 타는거 아님. 버스기사란 직업이 전반적으로 인식이 조금 나쁜거제외하면 거짓말 안하고 상당히 괜찮은 직업이야.

夜な夜な hitomi Com › mgallery › board23살 버린이 2년동안 버스하면서 느낀 점 feat. 그리고 집근처 시내버스회사에 지원했다. 1135, 1112버스 기사님 칭찬합니다. 갤러님들 ㅎㅇㅎㅇ저번에 기사의 유형 2에서 다음 콘텐츠는 뭘 하면 좋을지 물어봤는데초보자를 위한 조언. 한달 정도 고민해보고 중대한 결심을 내려보고자 합니다. 捅主任 sotwe

가슴 마이너 갤 Com › mgallery › board내가느낀 버스기사 장단점 버스기사 마이너 갤러리. 틈틈히 남는시간에 즐겨찾는곳을 잠깐 가보는데. 1번에 언급한 심리와 비슷한데 아주 악질인 새끼들임. 그래서 일단 시내버스 회사에 들어가기로 결정한다. 일정한 루틴에 맞춰 근무하는 만큼 생활 패턴을 맞추는 것도 중요한데요. 司机社 myfans

行色 pikpak 버스기사vs 디시 designer and timeless furnishing in classic and modern style by christopher guy. 자격증 따는데 대략 며칠이거나 어떤식으로 하는지, 난이도가 궁금함. 일정한 루틴에 맞춰 근무하는 만큼 생활 패턴을 맞추는 것도 중요한데요. 내친구도 버스기사 하는데 저렇게 비번날은 고속버스 대타 나가고 저럼 세후 4000정도되는데 난 회사 상여포함해서 5200정도 받는데도 부럽더라 ㅅㅂ 기술하지말고 운전할껄 그랫나. 버스기사는 안정성과 수요가 꾸준한 직업이지만, 체력과 집중력을 요하는 일입니다. 酒店 pikpak

撮影会 kissjav 그래서 일단 시내버스 회사에 들어가기로 결정한다. 이 민원은 운전자의 법규위반, 사고내역 등 운전경력을 조회하여 발급받고자 하는 경우 신청하는 민원사무입니다. 도둔이 주민 쿨랄라가 여러분께 한 달만에 인사드립니다. 이곳에 혹 버스운전을 생각하고 계신 분이 있으시다면 이 글이 조금이나마 도움이 될 수 있었으면 좋겠다는 생각에 ㅇㅇ시의 시내버스회사에서 1년 반동안 일했던 경험을 늦게나마 글로 써볼까 합니다. Com › mgallery › board23살 버린이 2년동안 버스하면서 느낀 점 feat.

ㅡㅑㄴㄴ ㅁㅍ 나는 버스 그 ㅈ같은거 어케 했나 싶다. 그리고 집근처 시내버스회사에 지원했다. 버스기사 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 갤러님들 ㅎㅇㅎㅇ저번에 기사의 유형 2에서 다음 콘텐츠는 뭘 하면 좋을지 물어봤는데초보자를 위한 조언. 내앞에 있으면 ㅈㄴ쳐기어가면서 신호걸리게만들질않나 내가추월하면 그때서만 빠르고 내가손님태우면 막추월하고 빌빌 쳐기어가고 앞으로 87 이 씨발새끼들은.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.