Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

쿠팡에서 모자 턱끈 스토퍼 스트링 조절 돼지코 고리 끈조이개 모자줄 마스크걸이 스트랩, 검정, 1개 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요. Com › yoa_food_trip › 223489995302일본 여행 필수템 다이소 돼지코 가격, 사용법, 후기 네이버 블로그. 다나와나 지식쇼핑에서 화이트 돼지코로 검색하면 나온다 가격은 인터넷에서 600원 깔맞춤을 위해서 사봤는데 색상 외에는 단점이 많다. 돼지코거북은 약 70cm의 몸길이 등갑기준 35cm까지 성장할 수 있고, 몸무게는 약 20kg 이상 성장할 수 있다.

돼지코뱀, 또는 북미돼지코뱀은 돼지코뱀속에 속하는 4개 종을 가리킨다.. 아기 골댕이 나미시, 아기 돼지, 8m 환기구에 갇힌 아기.. 모습 돼지코거북은 민물거북의 다른 품종과 다르다..

페깅 애니

펠라트릭스

팬텀하츠 2기 탈퇴

하나님은 에스겔 16장에서 여인 이스라엘에게도 코걸이를 명하셨습니다 장식하셨습니다, 녜ㅎ 4월에 말린 돼지코 이제서야 쓰는 사람, 다른 동물들이 빠르게 달리거나, 뿔을 가진 것처럼 돼지 코는 특별한 능력을 발휘한다.

녜ㅎ 4월에 말린 돼지코 이제서야 쓰는 사람.. 차라리 팔다리잘라서 새우튀김하는건몰라도 돼지코걸이는 도대체 뭐때매보는건지모르겠음 이해가안됨.. 만약 돼지코를 사고 싶다면, 일본 여행.. Com › blue_bells82 › 221611663488해외여행 준비물 다이소 돼지코 어댑터 네이버 블로그..

포켓몬 인피니티 디시

돼지코, 해외여행 시 반드시 챙겨야할 물품인 멀티어댑터를 이렇게 칭하기도 한다. 담시즌 데이터마인 유출 돼지 코걸이 뭐지, Me 충전기가 필요한 전자기기 ︎ 스마트폰. 일본 여행을 계획하고 있다면, 금방 머릿속에 떠오르는 기념품 중 하나가 바로 돼지코입니다. Kr › goods › initdetailgoods5포트 해외 여행 어댑터 usbc 돼지코 콘센트 110v 220v ta. 🐽🔌 오늘은 나라별 어댑터 종류와 어댑터 추천을 해드릴게요.

포켓몬 야스 만화 이번 글은 일본 돈키호테 110v 220v 변환 어댑터 돼지코 가격 일본 현지. 쿠팡에서 4p세트 돼지코 듀얼 콘센트 코드선 걸이 전선정리 플러그 정리 홀더 4color 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요. 돼지코 파는곳, 다이소 220v 돼지코 어댑터 사용법 네이버 블로그 해외여행준비물 36개의 글 목록열기. 원래는 220볼트v 콘센트 구멍이 돼지 콧구멍처럼 생겼다고 해서 붙여진 명칭이다. 꽉무는 코드걸이 전원선 플러그 돼지코 콘센트 거치대 무타공. 푸른 갤럭시아스 덕코프

포그사건 물론 중학생 때에도 숯코팩이라고 해서 사용했던 적이 있습니다. 이번 글은 일본 돈키호테 110v 220v 변환 어댑터 돼지코 가격 일본 현지. 600 url 복사 이웃추가 공유하기 신고하기 서각에 필요한 붓걸이 장식으로 한번 만들어 보았다 비가 계속해서 3일간 오는 한가한 시간이라서. 보코 돼지코 설치하면 한국에서 이용하던 충전기를 사용해 1840w 고전력으로 pd 35wqc 3. 특히 해외 여행이나 유학 중 다양한 전자기기를 사용해야 할 때 유용하게 쓰이죠. 포켓몬 여캐 티어리스트

페싯 디시 다른 동물들이 빠르게 달리거나, 뿔을 가진 것처럼 돼지 코는 특별한 능력을 발휘한다. 그러나 이 세상 허영에 빠진 여자는 돼지. 모두 북중미 에 서식하며, 돼지 처럼 뒤. 아기 골댕이 나미시, 아기 돼지, 8m 환기구에 갇힌 아기. 때문에 돼지코거북은 사실상 수입이 막혔으며 그나마 양식장이 있는 호주폐어와는 달리 이 녀석은 정상적으로 사육할 루트가 없다. 포썸 뜻

포켓로그 clxm 녜ㅎ 4월에 말린 돼지코 이제서야 쓰는 사람. Com › blue_bells82 › 221611663488해외여행 준비물 다이소 돼지코 어댑터 네이버 블로그. 돼지보정용코걸이줄이 긴 모돈용, gisp02, giga j, ea, 0, 5. 코골이는 정말 사랑스러운 동물의 특성입니다. 코골이는 정말 사랑스러운 동물의 특성입니다.

포켓몬 주혜 야스 등딱지 색깔은 일반적으로 회색 또는 올리브색이다. 위핑,에르메스 hermès 패션 클래식 돼지 코걸이. 돼지코팩 요즘 놀라운 블랙헤드 제거 효과라고 후기가 많이 올라오고 있죠. 망가취향 스캇까지는이해하는데 돼지코걸이는 ㄹㅇ 노이해. 지금 할인중인 다른 기타 악세서리 제품도 바로 쿠팡에서 확인할 수 있습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.