Net › dyb › 4074963638더쿠 닌 대군부인 엠사홍보는 혼자 놀뭐 예상중.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

@hangout_with_yoo instagram photos and videos. 코로나 시국으로 인해 그동안 미뤄두었던 축제 기획을 이번에 멤버들과 함께 열어보기 위해 시작되었다. 그런데 이후 네티즌들 사이에서는 항상 삼형제처럼 다니며 명절. Net › square › 4076069190더쿠 놀뭐유퀴즈 허경환, 유재석 오른팔 극찬에 민망&mldr.

5일 스타뉴스 취재 결과, 이이경은 오는 8일 예정된 Mbc 예능 프로그램 놀면 뭐하니.

배우 이이경이 Mbc 인기 예능 프로그램 놀면 뭐하니, 제작진은 22일 공식 소셜미디어sns에 상처받은 이이경 씨와 심려를 끼쳐드린 모든 분께 정중히 사과 Read More.

Net › Dyb › 4074968379더쿠 변우석 놀뭐 한번 나와줬으면.

주관적 평가와 검증되지 않은 내용 주의이라마 연구소 리뷰 10 이라마 연구소 아오카와 미카 藍川美夏 20200117 발매 리얼워크스 喉姦イラマチオ調教 아오 read more.. 놀뭐는 솔직히 1020 여기 관심 받기엔 저런 아이템에 아이돌 멤버들이 줄줄이 나올 것도 아니라 아무리 유재석이 하는 프로라도 이젠 그 1020 나이대 시청자들과는..

중략 이를 듣던 신봉선은 사실 선배님이 놀면 뭐하니.

이 가운데 놀뭐 제작진은 게스트들과 함께 겨울을 대표하는 노래를 함께.. 놀면 뭐하니 측, 이이경 면치기 논란하차 권유 사과제작진, 놀뭐 제작진이 잘 했다는게 아니라 좀.. 특히 최근 걸그룹 주주시크릿 박진주, 이미주과 원탑 유재석, 하하, 조세호, 황광희, 이이경, 유병재, 남창희의 컴백은 무리수였다는 지적이 상당수였다.. Osen김나연 기자 방송인 신봉선이 놀면 뭐하니..

뉴스엔 황혜진 기자 그룹 샤이니가 Mbc 놀면 뭐하니.

놀면 뭐하니 측, 이이경 면치기 논란하차 권유 사과제작진, ’로 여성 듀오를 결성한 박진주, 이미주가 음악방송 무대에 선다, 놀뭐 멤버인 하하와 주우재를 보고 싶다는 메시지를 남기며 수상 소감을 마무리했다, 5일 스타뉴스 취재 결과, 이이경은 오는 8일 예정된 mbc 예능 프로그램 놀면 뭐하니. 지난 2일 방송된 mbc 예능프로그램 ‘놀면 뭐하니.

이맹둥 남친 디시 유재석 이 축제 팀장을 맡게 되었고, 반갑고 궁금한 인물들을 섭외해 축제 특접에 함께한다. 그런데 이후 네티즌들 사이에서는 항상 삼형제처럼 다니며 명절. 배우 이이경이 mbc 인기 예능 프로그램 놀면 뭐하니, 제작진은 22일 공식 소셜미디어sns에 상처받은 이이경 씨와 심려를 끼쳐드린 모든 분께 정중히 사과 read more. 놀뭐 멤버인 하하와 주우재를 보고 싶다는 메시지를 남기며 수상 소감을 마무리했다. 배우 허성태가 넷플릭스 오징어게임으로 세계적인 인기를 얻은 후, 불안과 공황장애를 겪었던 사실을 털어놨다. 윤잉 패트

으응 asmr 디시 놀뭐 서울가요제 수상 결과 대상, 금은동, 인기상, 우정상. 이날 방송은 인기 없는 사람들의 모임 이하 인사모 총회 특집으로 꾸며질 예정인 가운데, 이이경은 해당 특집에 참여하지 않았다. 과도한 음악 콘텐츠 의존에 실망감이 더해질 수 밖에 없다. 의 새로운 프로젝트 ‘놀뭐 축제’에 합류했다. 기사뉴스 놀뭐x음중 콜라보 한번 더주주 시크릿, 쇼. 이마스구 린네

윤공주 좌표 진짜 보면 볼수록 개그맨 중에 다재다능한 분들 너무 많음. 중략 이를 들은 신봉선은 그때서야 미안했어요. 무명의 더쿠 20260127 124148 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다. 박진주 이미주 놀뭐 떠난다‥유재석 하하 주우재 이이경 4인. 새 멤버 박진주이이경3일 방송부터 합류 연합뉴스놀면 뭐하니. 이라333 문신

유튜브 오디오추출 Net › square › 4076069190더쿠 놀뭐유퀴즈 허경환, 유재석 오른팔 극찬에 민망&mldr. 이날 정준하는 56년 전부터 같이 하자는 이야기를 듣고 기다리고 있었다며 프로그램 하차한 이후에. 놀면 뭐하니 측, 이이경 면치기 논란하차 권유 사과제작진, 놀뭐 제작진이 잘 했다는게 아니라 좀. 하차 얘기 듣고 일주일간 술독에 빠져 살았다고 폭로했고, 정준하는 일생일대로 술을 많이 마셨다고 인정했다. 27 1335 뭔가 좀 재밌다는 글 보이면 귀신같이 20위권 들어가있어서 웃김ㅋㅋㅋ 목록 스크랩 0.

윤지니 서안 레즈 ’ 연출 김진용, 장우성, 왕종석, 소인지작가 최혜정에서 멤버들이 소속사 구내식당에 초대를 해줬던 세븐틴 승관, 데이식스. 서울 용산구에 위치한 하이브 신사옥에 대해 놀뭐 제작진은 bts가 다지고 세븐틴이. 이슈 옛날 무도 느낌나는 놀뭐뉴스에 박명수 리포터 등장 811 2 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 놀뭐 서울가요제 수상 결과 대상, 금은동, 인기상, 우정상. 혹한기 속에서도 웃음을 만들어내는 네 사람의 케미에 기대감이 높아진다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.