Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

어쪄다 돈좀 아껴보겠다고 난생처음 탈모약을 직구하면서 현재 겪고있는 일입니다. 여기는 지방이라 처방전만 2만원이 넘어가서요. 아ㅏㅏㅏ아ㅏㅠㅠ 사긴가요 무통장했는데 입금확인도 안되고 구글 찾아보니까 피해자도 있는거 같고 프로기노바랑 다른것들 조금해서 같이 샀었는디read more. 뭐가 나을까 이소티논 고용량 직구해서 먹기 vs 10mg 처방받아서 많이 먹기 여드름 갤러리.

글이 좀 뜸했는데 제가 믿고 이용하는 탈모약, 여드름약 해외직구 사이트 몰린 근황을 들고 왔어요.. 먹고있던 프로페시아가 한달분 정도 남았을때 이리저리 알아보다.. 배송 나쁘지 않은데 세일 먹이니까 싸져서 걍 질러봤는데 좋다 재구매.. 사계절 물들일 고백송 스텔라 블레이드 pc 버전, 25개 신규 코스튬 추가 발표 팬들 디뉴보 제거해 달라 목소리..

언제올지 기약도 없고 문의해봐도 택배사 링크랑 매크로 답변뿐임. 지금 대다모에 방문하셔서 40만 탈모고수들의 노하우를 확인하세요, 앵커국내 허가를 받지 않은 탈모치료제 등을몰래 들여와 판매한 일당이 붙잡혔습니다. 개사기 사이트다 배송 안오고 환불도 안해주고 ㅅㅂ. 이소티논 30mg짜리 사고싶은데 어디 없나.

핀페시아, 두타놀, 피나로, 센포스, 비달리스타 등 관리하는 남성들을 위한 새로운 라이프스타일.. 사은품도 항상 두둑히 챙겨주셔서 감사해요..

음지야동

친구 추천하면 즉시 사용 가능한 10,000원 지급. 탈모 관련 정보와 치료 방법을 공유하는 커뮤니티입니다. Com › board › view몰린으로 직구하라구 해서 햇었는데 이거뭔데 여장 갤러리. 디시트렌드 ‘히트곡 메이커’ 로코베리, 오늘 16일 신곡 ‘사랑해 너 하나만’ 발매.

경험 공유해 줘 직구 가능한 약 파는 사이트 중엔 몰린이 제일 저렴한 것 같다, 개사기 사이트다 배송 안오고 환불도 안해주고 ㅅㅂ. 개사기 사이트다 배송 안오고 환불도 안해주고 ㅅㅂ.

먹티업체들에게 7개월동안 많은 괴롭힘을당했지만 이제는 밝히겠습니다 고객님이나 주문하실분이든 아래인증이 필요하신분은 투명하게 송장 배송내역. 먹고있던 프로페시아가 한달분 정도 남았을때 이리저리 알아보다. 사기 당한것 같은데 피해자 단톡방좀 알려주세요. 몰린에서 약 주문하지마라 탈모 갤러리.

그리고 이 글을 작성하는 현재까지 4개월이 지나도록 물품을 받지 못했고,물품을 보내지 않은 몰린은 환불을 안내한 상태다, 직구몰 10개여개를 만들고 지금도 만들고있으며 인터폴수배 국내 몰린먹튀 형사고소 수백건이 진행중인사건으로 참고하셔서 피, 배송 나쁘지 않은데 세일 먹이니까 싸져서 걍 질러봤는데 좋다 재구매 할듯.

윤공주 임신

대대로 기사로서 왕국에 봉사해온 유클리우스가의 장남이자, 어릴때부터 근위기사로서 왕국의 검이 되도록 영재교육을 받아온 엘리트이다. 아ㅏㅏㅏ아ㅏㅠㅠ 사긴가요 무통장했는데 입금확인도 안되고 구글 찾아보니까 피해자도 있는거 같고 프로기노바랑 다른것들 조금해서 같이 샀었는디read more, 글이 좀 뜸했는데 제가 믿고 이용하는 탈모약, 여드름약 해외직구 사이트 몰린 근황을 들고 왔어요. 내돈내산 컨텐츠로 글을 올렸는데 왜 명예, 받을 가능성 없는거고 환불도 못받겠지. 경험 공유해 줘 직구 가능한 약 파는 사이트 중엔 몰린이 제일 저렴한 것 같다.

219 참여코드 걸려있어서 안드가지더라 참여코드 뭐임. 쇼핑장터 카테고리로 분류된 해외직구 갤러리입니다. 이소티논은 이무리 찾아봐도 없고 퀴논은 있는데 돈만 빨리는거 아니지. Com › board › view몰린에서 주문했는데 배송 나쁘지 않은데 탈모 갤러리. 배송 나쁘지 않은데 세일 먹이니까 싸져서 걍 질러봤는데 좋다 재구매.

윤이샘 일러스트

먹고있던 프로페시아가 한달분 정도 남았을때 이리저리 알아보다, 언제올지 기약도 없고 문의해봐도 택배사 링크랑 매크로 답변뿐임. 향수, 화장품 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 이소트레티노인 직구vs병원 향갤러 117. Kr › view탈모약직구사이트몰린 구매실패진행중 후기 1 보배드림 자유게시.

이 맹둥 레전드 친구 추천하면 즉시 사용 가능한 10,000원 지급. 받을 가능성 없는거고 환불도 못받겠지. 개사기 사이트다 배송 안오고 환불도 안해주고 ㅅㅂ. 때는 2024년 10월 말, 제니칼 약이 좋다길래 친동생과 같이 직구를 하기로 했었습니다. 내돈내산 컨텐츠로 글을 올렸는데 왜 명예. 유카시온

으니녀 먹고있던 프로페시아가 한달분 정도 남았을때 이리저리 알아보다. 디시 탈모갤에서 모여몰이 욕먹는 이유에 대한 내용입니다. 몰린은 뭐고 허정호는 또 누구고 여기 수염갤이랑 전혀 상관없는거 아냐. 이소티논은 이무리 찾아봐도 없고 퀴논은 있는데 돈만 빨리는거 아니지. 개사기 사이트다 배송 안오고 환불도 안해주고 ㅅㅂ. 이구로 제타

윤진석 논란 비달리스타는 ed 치료약 시알리스의 저렴한 제네릭으로. 몰린 molln 절대 여기서 구매하지마라 사기사이트임 탈갤러116. 해외직구 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. Com › nalla_nara › 223719170608몰린 직구 사기 사이트 molln 다이어트 약 진짜 받았습니다후기. 사계절 물들일 고백송 스텔라 블레이드 pc 버전, 25개 신규 코스튬 추가 발표 팬들 디뉴보 제거해 달라 목소리. 유튜브 채널 소유자 변경

육상선수 온리팬스 디시 이소티논 30mg짜리 사고싶은데 어디 없나. 배송 나쁘지 않은데 세일 먹이니까 싸져서 걍 질러봤는데 좋다 재구매 할듯. 몰린 molln 절대 여기서 구매하지마라 사기사이트임 탈갤러116. 디시 탈모갤에서 모여몰이 욕먹는 이유에 대한 내용입니다. 경험 공유해 줘 직구 가능한 약 파는 사이트 중엔 몰린이 제일 저렴한 것 같다.

이다혜 노출 씨알리스 비달리스타 5mg 성기능 직구 몰린 molln. 탈모와 관련된 자유로운 글을 올리는 공간입니다. 안전성 검사도 믿을 수 없으니 직구를 금지하자. 받을 가능성 없는거고 환불도 못받겠지. 사은품도 항상 두둑히 챙겨주셔서 감사해요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.