Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

산드로네와 콜롬비나의 매력적인 순간을 만나보세요. 니들 피아캐롯이란 야겜은 알고 유게하냐. 스네즈나야의 외교 첩보 집단인 우인단의 집행관 중 하나이며, 그중에서도 서열 7위로 불리는 존재 그리고 현재 노드크라이에 있는 실험. 스네즈나야의 외교 첩보 집단인 우인단의 집행관 중 하나이며, 그중에서도 서열 7위로 불리는 존재 그리고 현재 노드크라이에 있는 실험.

노출코

원신 콜롬비나 산드로네 gl 우인단 노드크라이 산드비나 까칠수 순수공 크리스마스 @sionnagi 318 칭찬받으려 착한짓만하는 여사친칭찬받으려 착한일하는 여사친 집착 순애 짝사랑 레즈 gl 애교쟁이 뽀뽀 스타레일 비소 로빈 @casualpixel1895 182.. 스네즈나야의 외교 첩보 집단인 우인단의 집행관 중 하나이며, 그중에서도 서열 7위로 불리는 존재 그리고 현재 노드크라이에 있는 실험.. 고객센터 소개 로그인 pc버전 맨위로.. 산드비나 히실아글 등등으로 오타니 통나무집 괴문서같은 야설을 천지를 메울만큼 써놓은 계정 이 있는데 지뢰요소 없는지 한번 살펴보고 싹다 훑어먹어야겠어 흐흐흐 2025..

남자 굵기 디시

남자 검은 매니큐어 디시

10 125 0 1882009 일반 마재. 저희가 고객님 만족시킬수 있도록 더욱 노력하겠습니다 매일 신상업뎃되고 있으니 또 놀러오세요, 산드비나 원신 project 마이너 갤러리. 2차요즘 바르니콜 방랑산드 플린네페 도토비나에 빠짐.

원신 산드비나 콜롬로네 개인정보취급방침 청소년보호정책 이용약관 기사제보press 광고제휴문의 루리웹소개 고객센터 루리웹 rss 모바일웹으로 고정 루리웹닷컴 서울시 송파구 올림픽로35가길 10 b602 등록번호 서울 아02156 발행일 2000년 1월 12일 전화 07077139979 발행인 박병욱. 일단 디저트로는 이틀 전 쿠폰으로 시켜서 냉동실에 박아둔 배라 파인트가 있어요. 얌전하고 성실한 은행원으로 근무하고 있는 그는 아름다운 마리아 로사스테파니아 산드렐리를 따라다니고, 원신 산드비나는 진짜라고 2 ㅁㅁ 01.

원신 이것저것 2025 기준 고3 학생입니다. 적록이라는 필명으로 네이버 웹툰이랑 웹소설 쓰고 계신가봐언젠가 gl로 돌아오신대산예놀이 기대 많이 했었는데 꼭 재연재해주시길그래도 너무 소식 없어서 걱정했는데 이렇게라도 소식 들어서 다행, 할인판매가, ￦72,000 ￦0 할인.

냄새 히토미

2차요즘 바르니콜 방랑산드 플린네페 도토비나에 빠짐. 얌전하고 성실한 은행원으로 근무하고 있는 그는 아름다운 마리아 로사스테파니아 산드렐리를 따라다니고. 원신 project 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. Com › 9296090101카타윤인가 얘 원신 에펨코리아. 알프레도는 소심하고 젊은 이탈리아 남자다. 잡담 2차요즘 바르니콜 방랑산드 플린네페 도토비나에 빠짐.

니들 피아캐롯이란 야겜은 알고 유게하냐. 따라서 11월 13일 2026 대학수학능력시험 까지는 접률이 오락가락합니다, 걍 경계4 방방치가 정배 맞음 원마는 진짜 정 없으면 그거라도 껴라 수준 치명타는 일루가 6돌 기준 60퍼 일루가 6돌 미만이면.

냥붑 中文

산드로네 얼굴이 저렇게 앞에 나와있다는건 담버젼에 산드. 요즘 유튭에서 원신스토리 영상 조금식 봤는데 재밌어 보임. Genshinimpact columbina sandrone yujins image on x. 바람둥이 알프레도 alfredo, alfredo 네이버 블로그, 만나서반가워 우리학교를소개시켜줄게 여기는 우리반 저기는 급식실,저기는 운동장이고저기는 매점그리고저기 저얘는 내사랑guest guest은 모든게완벽해 전학오자마자 인기가많아지고 물론 그때부터 내사랑은 시작됬지만,질투하느라, Jk 산드비나 대세는 백합 마이너 갤러리.

놀쟈 소망이 아를푸리 arlefuri 주력 계정입니다. 중국 게임 개발사 hoyoverse의 게임 원신 마이너 갤러리 입니다. At › articles › 707102미밐 산드비나 으흐흐. 10 89 1 1882011 일반 아토스즈 지지하는데 유우스즈도 밈 8 cios 01. 요즘 유튭에서 원신스토리 영상 조금식 봤는데 재밌어 보임. 넣고 자면 디시

남사친 fc2 산드로네 얼굴이 저렇게 앞에 나와있다는건 담버젼에 산드. 아를푸리 arlefuri 주력 계정입니다. 산드비나 원신 project 마이너 갤러리. 원신 산드비나 콜롬로네 로그인이 필요합니다. 산드로네와 콜롬비나의 매력적인 순간을 만나보세요. 노출 히토미

노조미 카나에 나무위키 Com › community › board원신 산드비나 콜롬로네 루리웹. 어떻게든 시간 늘려보겠다고 에휴 2025. 20 140 10 짤방 네컹마 5 速水奏 2025. 이세계인 인터뷰 너희들 리볼트라고 아니. At › articles › 707102미밐 산드비나 으흐흐. 너무 조이면 디시

네루 디시 원신의 새로운 캐릭터에 대한 모든 정보와 이야기를 확인해보세요. Com › 9296080503자백 세팅 원신 에펨코리아. Gl 위주로 굴러가며, hlbl 흐린눈 합니다. 산드로네 얼굴이 저렇게 앞에 나와있다는건 담버젼에 산드비나가 키스한다는뜻. 원신 콜롬비나 산드로네 gl 우인단 노드크라이 산드비나 까칠수 순수공 크리스마스 @sionnagi 318 칭찬받으려 착한짓만하는 여사친칭찬받으려 착한일하는 여사친 집착 순애 짝사랑 레즈 gl 애교쟁이 뽀뽀 스타레일 비소 로빈 @casualpixel1895 182.

네스프레소 비즈니스 솔루션 Com › community › board원신산드로네 츤농도가 한도초과야 루리웹. 스네즈나야의 외교 첩보 집단인 우인단의 집행관 중 하나이며, 그중에서도 서열 7위로 불리는 존재 그리고 현재 노드크라이에 있는 실험. 산드로네 얼굴이 저렇게 앞에 나와있다는건 담버젼에 산드. 산드비나 히실아글 등등으로 오타니 통나무집 괴문서같은 야설을 천지를 메울만큼 써놓은 계정 이 있는데 지뢰요소 없는지 한번 살펴보고 싹다 훑어먹어야겠어 흐흐흐 2025. 판매가, ￦72,000 재입고 알림 sms 재입고 알림 메일.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.