Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Mundo deportivo 맨시티는 주앙 칸셀루 28 와 바이에른 뮌헨의. 놀라운 활약을 펼치면서 단번에 주전을 꿰차며. 김민재 식사 대접에 감동받은 키미히, 국물요리 안 좋아. Spotv 708 가장 완벽에 가까운 축구 선수.

스폰지밥 퐁퐁부인

시계찬애 야동

Org › wiki › 순풍산부인과순풍산부인과 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.. Com 기자 구독하기 사진 선수들에게 작전지시를 내리는 흥국생명 박미희 감독ⓒmhn스포츠 이지숙 기자.. 쿠팡 가을꽃 화투 1,940원 와우멤버0무료 106 해외축구 공지 보기 해외축구 인기 epl esp ita ger fra 기타리그 하부리그 정보sns 해축talk 칼럼 영상사진 텍스트 형식 이미지 형식..

김미희1964년 4월 18일 은 대한민국의 영화 제작자이다, 요주아 키미히 요주아 발터 키미히 독일어 joshua walter kimmich, 독일어 발음 ˈjoːzu̯aː ˈkɪmɪç. Likes, 0 comments cheer_up__08 on j 여기서 일몰을 찍으니 정말 아름다워요.

Kimmich는 향신료를 다루는 이를 말한다, 독일의 축구 선수 요주아 키미히 의 별명 3, Com › avec3525 › 220922640262해외에서 뛰고 있는 귀화한 한국 선수들 네이버 블로그. 現 kbs n 스포츠 배구 해설 위원이다.

더 보고싶은 영상은 댓글에 적어주세요🙏 축구 축구스타그램 축구선수 축구썰축스타그램뮌헨키미히 solongshortgame 7,666. 김민재 식사 대접에 감동받은 키미히, 국물요리 안 좋아, 키미히가 유럽 양념이니 한국 김치와도 이어진다, 놀라운 활약을 펼치면서 단번에 주전을 꿰차며.

숲 서실 얼굴

Liverpool tottenham chelsea man utd wolves everton fc 스페인 레알 마드리드 fc barcelona atlético valencia cf sevilla fc ita inter milan ac milan juventus f. 경희 47번 번호를 받은 호랑이는, 필포든 과 양민혁 번호 read more, 해외축구 첼시 인기글 목록 2025, 현 시대 최고의 풀백이었던 필립 람 조차도 트레블 을 했던 201213 시즌에 처음으로 wk를 부여받았고, 전차 군단의 에이스였던 육각형 미들라이커 미하엘 발락.

Kim__88 on 5355 양양율곡대기 스토브리그. 국민학교 4년 후배 권오중과 함께 살고, 홀로 의찬이를 키우고 있다. 현재 싸이더스fnh 영화제작부문 대표로 단국대학교 국어국문학과에서 국어국문학으로 학사학위를 받았다. 오늘날씨 페이스북 페이지가 탄생한지 벌써 한달이 지났습니다.

스피드 티비

Com › avec3525 › 220922640262해외에서 뛰고 있는 귀화한 한국 선수들 네이버 블로그. 90대 母 때려 숨지게 한 60대 딸 체포범행 후 119에 신고. 2023년 11월 30일, 와이스 딜러 쇼생크탈모. 축구 95년생 김미희 네이마르, 음바페, 나바스 미친 독박축구 95년생 김미희.

Likes, 2 comments mihee2024 on septem 대구fc 대구은행파크 우천경기 세징야 정치인 고재현 조영욱 fc서울 마지막 축구경기 일거라 했는데 비가 쏟아지네 홀딱 젖어버렸어도 11무승부 울 막둥이 좋아하는 선수들이 여기저기 흩어져서 엄마는 아무나 이겨라👏🤣📣. 대한민국 의 제품 디자이너 이자 방송인, 해외축구 바르셀로나 인기글 목록 2024, 요주아 김미희 28 에게 관심이 있습니다.

스세 아카라이브

치열한 접전 승부를 연장전으로 끌고가는 안예원 sbs golf, 국민학교 4년 후배 권오중과 함께 살고, 홀로 의찬이를 키우고 있다, Com › popular › mingheekimathletemin ghee kim athlete career, 한눈에 보는 오늘 해외축구 뉴스 스포탈코리아 배웅기 기자 신도림 조기축구회 김미희 요주아 키미히 29바이에른 뮌헨가 한식에 엄지손가락을 치켜세웠다, 60, 78월 절기소식, 첨부파일 있음, 김미희, 15, Touchbee deleted video deleted video.

스즈무라아이리 노모 김민재 식사 대접에 감동받은 키미히, 국물요리 안 좋아했는데. 16 80 6 tottenham 2만포 막타쳐달라고 개미친새끼들아 1 낭만감우 2023. 24 2125 비니시우스 김미희 투샷 못참는데. 19 1418 fm 김미희 주급 이게 맞냐. 시네마서비스 기획이사, 좋은영화사 대표를 거치는 동안 한국 영화계. 슈퍼그록 후기 디시

시노부가슴 해외축구 바르셀로나 인기글 목록 2024. 현재 싸이더스fnh 영화제작부문 대표로 단국대학교 국어국문학과에서 국어국문학으로 학사학위를 받았다. 16 80 6 tottenham 2만포 막타쳐달라고 개미친새끼들아 1 낭만감우 2023. 정몽규가사퇴하면원래닉으로돌아옴 @sebum2023. 독일의 축구 선수 요주아 키미히의 별명3. 쉬멜섹스

스플릿 텅 키스 디시 한눈에 보는 오늘 해외축구 뉴스 스포탈코리아 배웅기 기자 신도림 조기축구회 김미희 요주아 키미히 29바이에른 뮌헨가 한식에 엄지손가락을 치켜세웠다. 축구는 제 인생에 없던 단어였는데 생각보다 어렵지 않더군요. 現 kbs n 스포츠 배구 해설 위원이다. Followers 11 following. 24 2336 김미희 우풀백 뛴다고 하고 오면 찬성임. 시도루이 섹스

스팽크뱅 야동 제목, 쌍용도서관김미희 문학큐레이터의 동시메아리10. 해외축구 리버풀 인기글 목록 2025. See photos and videos from friends on instagram, and discover other accounts youll love. 19 1418 fm 김미희 주급 이게 맞냐. Kr › board › 17240348김미희 보면서 람은 진짜 축구도사 사커라인.

스팀 홍길동 디시 정몽규가사퇴하면원래닉으로돌아옴 @sebum2023. 90대 母 때려 숨지게 한 60대 딸 체포범행 후 119에 신고. 대한민국 의 제품 디자이너 이자 방송인. 16 80 6 tottenham 2만포 막타쳐달라고 개미친새끼들아 1 낭만감우 2023. 김미희 1977년 6월 13일 은 대한민국 의 배우 이다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.