삼천포로 빠지는 느낌인데, 다시 중심을 잡아보자면 결론 20대의 극우화는 일종에 일베디시야갤문화가 다져놓은 토양 같은 느낌임.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

뭔가 언론사에서 이렇게 대대적으로 만드는거 신기하고 고맙다팔로우 ㄱㄱs. 김칼빵의 어머니는 참녀로 유명했죠 역시 당신은 김칼빵님이. Net › ktalk › 4026964818더쿠 인스타 극우화 진짜 너무너무 심각한듯. 131 병신년들 더 나대라 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 06.

11 1412 @발아를촉진시켜 디씨같은경우는 한국 한정일테고, 유럽, 북미쪽 인스타 컨텐츠들도 혐오, 차별, 가짜뉴스 컨텐츠 엄청나게 많습니다.. 개인적인 생각인데 대체로 극우화되었다기보단 인스타같은곳 아니면 그런생각 표출하기가 힘들어서 그런거같다 유튜브,인스타 이런 해외기업이 운영.. Net › square › 3772546179더쿠 인스타 극우화 어떻게 대처할 수 있을지 고민해보는 달글 jpg.. 0601 134712 수정일 20250601 134737 인스타 스토리만 놀랍니다 부정 선거 증거니 이재명 아들이 젓가락 발언해서 500만 원 벌금 받았다는 허위 사실 유포하고 요즘 몰랐던 벌레들이 날뛰네요 basilmint ip 118..

Kr › Free › 21964274잇싸 전세계 젊은 사람들 극우화는 인스타 영향이 제일 클걸요.

231 0601 155701 인스타 유튜브.

걔네들이 돈대주니까 커뮤 유튭 인스타에 열심히. 최근 시국이 시국이다보니 피드를 넘기다보면 정치 관련 피드를 알고리즘이 먹이기 시작했는데, 하나같이 이재명 악마화나 ai 4컷만화로 이재명 드럼통, 호텔경제학 까는 내용들입니다. 일반 인스타 20대 극우화에 대해 어떻게 생각함 elounger 2025. 유세윤 씨가 ㅇㅇ블리 류의 소위 인스타팔이 계정을 풍자하는. 극우라는 워딩 자체도 좌파의 프로파간다인건 알고쓰니, 이게 재밌을 거라 생각하니까 올리고 재밌다고 생각하니까 좋아요를 누르고 댓글로 낄낄대는 거겠죠.

Heedoo 진짜 짜증나네 언제까지 지들 멋대로 할 건데. 231 0601 155701 인스타 유튜브. 사람들은 세뇌되고 극우 정치얘기로 도배돼서 인스타 들어가기도 싫음 근데 신기한 게 이재명대통령님 초반엔 분명 인스타여론에서 지지자도 꽤 있었는데 어느순간부터 싹 사라짐 난 분명 조직적인 활동이 있다고 봐 너무너무 심각해서 한탄 나옴, 탬버린 김거니 사막여우 물어보는 영상 뜨길래 댓글 봤더니 뭔 사랑스러워요, 범죄자 부인과 비교된다느니 시발 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 131 병신년들 더 나대라 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 06.

인스타 극우화 노래불러서 둘러본 소감 중도정치 마이너. 심지어 저는 더민주, 민노당, 진보당, 기소당, 사민당 등등 거의 민주당보다 왼쪽에 가깝게 정치계정 팔로잉이. 케이돌토크 잡담 인스타 극우화 진짜 너무너무 심각한듯 91 0 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 클리앙 일베 디시 펨코를 보면 극우화 보다 더 심각한게 묘냥이 2025, 유세윤 씨가 ㅇㅇ블리 류의 소위 인스타팔이 계정을 풍자하는.

극우화 이유로 커뮤니 인스타니 그건 표면적인 문제고, 극우화 이유로 커뮤니 인스타니 그건 표면적인 문제고. Com › 8589454281인스타는 솔직히 대체로 극우화 맞는듯 ㅇㅇ 정치시사 에펨코리아. 인스타 극우화 진짜 존나 심하다 말로만 듣다가 봤는데. Com › mgallery › board인스타 20대 극우화에 대해 어떻게 생각함 새로운보수당 마이너 갤.

사람들은 세뇌되고 극우 정치얘기로 도배돼서 인스타 들어가기도 싫음 근데 신기한 게 이재명대통령님 초반엔 분명 인스타여론에서 지지자도 꽤 있었는데 어느순간부터 싹 사라짐 난 분명 조직적인 활동이 있다고 봐 너무너무 심각해서 한탄 나옴. 김칼빵의 어머니는 참녀로 유명했죠 역시 당신은 김칼빵님이, 인간의 뇌와 유전자에 각인된 침팬지 근성 2. 인스타 극우화 노래불러서 둘러본 소감 중도정치 마이너, 아 말투+손 보고 여시계집인줄 ㅠㅠ손이쁘단소리임 놀리는. 정말 정치 관심가지는 10대들은 1찍이 과반이고 찢이 그렇게 싫어도 4찍을 하면했지 2찍은 안함.

케이돌토크 잡담 인스타 극우화 진짜 너무너무 심각한듯 91 0 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

Com › 8589454281인스타는 솔직히 대체로 극우화 맞는듯 ㅇㅇ 정치시사 에펨코리아. 유세윤 씨가 ㅇㅇ블리 류의 소위 인스타팔이 계정을 풍자하는. 최신순 등록순 최신순 답글순 ㅇㅇ 223, 131 병신년들 더 나대라 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 06, 120 인스타보고 2찍됨 ㅇㅈㄹ 개병신같은 년들ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ근데 신기하긴 하네 한녀들 무지성 민주당 지지일줄 알았는데 20대랑 30대초는 절반이나 반민주네 06, 극우화에 경각심을 느끼고 심도 깊은 연구와 논쟁을 펼치고 있는 대학생들이 있음에 큰 희망을 느꼈어요.

오늘의 결론 정치무관심층 10대가 내란견이고 정치 read more. 극우화에 경각심을 느끼고 심도 깊은 연구와 논쟁을 펼치고 있는 대학생들이 있음에 큰 희망을 느꼈어요. 초딩 극우화는 ㄹㅇ 무조건 인스타 영향인듯. 사람들은 세뇌되고 극우 정치얘기로 도배돼서 인스타 들어가기도 싫음 근데 신기한 게 이재명대통령님 초반엔 분명 인스타여론에서 지지자도 꽤 있었는데 어느순간부터 싹 사라짐 난 분명 조직적인 활동이 있다고 봐 너무너무 심각해서 한탄 나옴.

제나 놀쟈 50 likes, 7 comments wilma. 오늘의 결론 정치무관심층 10대가 내란견이고 정치 read more. 진짜 문제는 여론조작에 돈쓰는 새끼들이지. 사람들은 세뇌되고 극우 정치얘기로 도배돼서 인스타 들어가기도 싫음 근데 신기한 게 이재명대통령님 초반엔 분명 인스타여론에서 지지자도 꽤 있었는데 어느순간부터 싹 사라짐 난 분명 조직적인 활동이 있다고 봐 너무너무 심각해서 한탄 나옴. 케이돌토크 잡담 인스타 극우화 진짜 너무너무 심각한듯 91 0 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 젤다 만화 디시

젠틀맨 다시보기 누누 김칼빵의 어머니는 참녀로 유명했죠 역시 당신은 김칼빵님이. 1854년 미주리 협정의 폐기를 반대한다는 기치 아래 휘그당 내 탈당파, 자유토지당, 북부 세력이 연합하여 창당하였다. 231 0601 155701 인스타 유튜브. 궁금해서 물어본 건 아니지만 솔직히 조금 궁금하기도 하네요. Kr › free › 21964274잇싸 전세계 젊은 사람들 극우화는 인스타 영향이 제일 클걸요. 젠슨황 짤 디시

조버지 디시 Com › mgallery › board인스타 20대 극우화에 대해 어떻게 생각함 새로운보수당 마이너 갤. 11 1412 @발아를촉진시켜 디씨같은경우는 한국 한정일테고, 유럽, 북미쪽 인스타 컨텐츠들도 혐오, 차별, 가짜뉴스 컨텐츠 엄청나게 많습니다. 유세윤 씨가 ㅇㅇ블리 류의 소위 인스타팔이 계정을 풍자하는. Com › 8589454281인스타는 솔직히 대체로 극우화 맞는듯 ㅇㅇ 정치시사 에펨코리아. Net › subdued20club › rehf인스타 극우화 어떻게 대처할 수 있을지 고민해보는 달글 악플달면. 정희수 미드 디시

조개파티 다운 개인적인 생각인데 대체로 극우화되었다기보단 인스타같은곳 아니면 그런생각 표출하기가 힘들어서 그런거같다 유튜브,인스타 이런 해외기업이 운영. Com › mgallery › board인스타 20대 극우화에 대해 어떻게 생각함 새로운보수당 마이너 갤. 중국인 간첩 처벌 못하는 진짜 이유 민주당 탓. 싱글벙글 싱글벙글 전설의 칼잡이 김칼빵. 김칼빵의 어머니는 참녀로 유명했죠 역시 당신은 김칼빵님이.

정제 계수장비 0601 134712 수정일 20250601 134737 인스타 스토리만 놀랍니다 부정 선거 증거니 이재명 아들이 젓가락 발언해서 500만 원 벌금 받았다는 허위 사실 유포하고 요즘 몰랐던 벌레들이 날뛰네요 basilmint ip 118. 131 병신년들 더 나대라 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 06. 인스타 극우화 진짜 존나 심하다 말로만 듣다가 봤는데. 0601 134712 수정일 20250601 134737 인스타 스토리만 놀랍니다 부정 선거 증거니 이재명 아들이 젓가락 발언해서 500만 원 벌금 받았다는 허위 사실 유포하고 요즘 몰랐던 벌레들이 날뛰네요 basilmint ip 118. 0601 134712 수정일 20250601 134737 인스타 스토리만 놀랍니다 부정 선거 증거니 이재명 아들이 젓가락 발언해서 500만 원 벌금 받았다는 허위 사실 유포하고 요즘 몰랐던 벌레들이 날뛰네요 basilmint ip 118.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.