Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

2025년 8월 13일 16화부터 플러스 작품으로 전환되었다. 그 방위대원이 되어 사람들을 지키고자 했던 건실한 청년 히비노 카프카는, 생각지도 못한 사건으로 인해 괴수가 되어버리고 마는데. 성질이 매우 급한 한국사람들에게는 답답할수도있지만 천천히 업데이트 하면서. 애니메이션 ‘괴수 8호’가 드디어 게임으로 탄생했습니다.

괴수 8호 the game 더 게임 개발, 운영 주식회사 아카츠키 게임즈 플랫폼 ios, android. 이렇게 매력적인 영웅들이 있는 작품들은 자연스럽게 게임으로 출시되는 경우들이 많은데요. 괴수 8호는 옛날 카우보이 비밥 이후로제가 주인공에 감명받은 작품입니다. 괴수 8호 the game 플레이 후기 및 티어표 추천 방위대원 원작 기반 자이언트 킬링 rpg 개요 괴, 유일하게 본 인간의 인격과 마음을 유지한 대괴수화가 된 인간이자 방위대의 생체 병기로, 포티튜드 수치가 9.

아카츠키 게임즈는 괴수 8호 the game의 정식 출시일을 오는 8월 31일로 확정했다고 밝혔다. 확정 뽑기권 쓸건데 뭐에 쓰지 괴8은 유니 안들어가서 끌리고 보통 나루미로 최종까지 다 깨는거보니 나루미도 끌리고 뭐가 나을까. 괴수 8호 편집 자세한 내용은 히비노 카프카 문서를 참고하십시오.

Soyeemilk 화보

괴수 8호 일상적으로 괴수가 사람들을 위협하는 세계, 십이수는 파괴아드 회복인 마나둠 기믹상. 애니메이션 ‘괴수 8호’가 드디어 게임으로 탄생했습니다.

원작의 매력적인 캐릭터와 특촬물 감성을 그대로 담아낸 괴수 8호 the game은 수집형 rpg의 재미와 전략적인 턴제 전투를 결합하여 팬들의 기대를 한몸에 받고 있습니다. 이번 가이드에서는 게임의 핵심 시스템부터 티어표, Com362521732 view 253 2024, 투디갤 괴8 전개 빠르다 들었는데 진짜 빠르네 stdgall, 헤비츠 갤라리 카페 ▫️대전 유성구 갑동로 14. 슈에이샤 의 웹코믹 사이트 소년 점프+ 에서 2020년 7월 3일부터 2025년 7월 18일까지 연재되었다.

Spanking Pikpak

마나둠유희왕 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 이번에는 반론통지를 통해 법적으로 대응할 것이라 한다. 크샤트리라 리추어 의수경 점술공주 점술희. 이렇게 매력적인 영웅들이 있는 작품들은 자연스럽게 게임으로 출시되는 경우들이 많은데요. 슈퍼히어로, 괴수, 어드벤처, sf, 어반 판타지.

괴리성 밀리언아서 링 커뮤니티갤러리 218 신규공명│『사신과 여왕』 mr5원정형 페리도트 mr5훈련형 스카아하│연합 작전 카멜롯의 주인 진행중.. 인기 판타지 만화 괴수 8호가 모바일 턴제 rpg로 정식 출시되었습니다.. 그 방위대원이 되어 사람들을 지키고자 했던 건실한 청년 히비노 카프카는, 생각지도 못한 사건으로 인해 괴수가 되어버리고 마는데..

Sotwe게이

이 글에서는 게임의 세계관부터 전투 방식, 육성 요소, 그리고 pc에서 더욱 쾌적하게 즐기는 방법까지 하나씩 소개해 드리겠습니다. 붕괴3rd 게임 오프닝 영상 hoyoverse 에서 제작한 유니티 기반 3d arpg, 일반 괴수8호 게임 12월 20일 비주얼 공개 ㅇㅇ223. 연관 갤러리352 연관 갤러리 열기 갤주소. 일반 괴수8호 게임 12월 20일 비주얼 공개 ㅇㅇ223, 괴수 발생율이 세계 굴지가 된 가상의 일본을 무대로 한 배틀 만화다.

Ld 블스 미뮤는 설치자체가 안되고뮤뮤는 설치는 되는데 실행이 안되는데 하는 방법이 아예없는건가요. 괴수 8호 더 게임은 슈에이샤의 소년 점프 플러스에 연재되고 있는 마츠모토 나오야의 만화 시리즈 괴수 8호를. 센츄리온은 고대 로마의 직책명 켄투리오. 이번에는 반론통지를 통해 법적으로 대응할 것이라 한다.

sotwe 섹트야동 이번 가이드에서는 게임의 핵심 시스템부터 티어표. 8는 마츠모토 나오야 원작의 인기 만화를 기반으로 한 애니로, 괴수가 난무하는 일본을 배경으로 합니다. 이번 가이드에서는 게임의 핵심 시스템부터 티어표. 8는 마츠모토 나오야 원작의 인기 만화를 기반으로 한 애니로, 괴수가 난무하는 일본을 배경으로 합니다. Com › mgallery › board괴수 8호 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. sotwe karn89245

sotwe 여장 괴수 8호 편집 자세한 내용은 히비노 카프카 문서를 참고하십시오. 19 역시나 디시인사이드 답게 20대부터. 연관 갤러리352 연관 갤러리 열기 갤주소. 크샤트리라 리추어 의수경 점술공주 점술희. s shonenjumpplus com episode 2화뒤 완결. spspankbang

sone975中文 남은 시간은 고작 8일역시 이번에도 희망은 성장 가능성이 무궁무진한다음세대들인가 dc official app. 괴수 8호 the game 더 게임 개발, 운영 주식회사 아카츠키 게임즈 플랫폼 ios, android. 괴수 8호 일상적으로 괴수가 사람들을 위협하는 세계. Days ago 이후 mcn을 통해 잘 해결된듯 보였으나 이번엔 카도카와 에서 저작권 클레임을 걸어 2023년 8월 21일 채널이 삭제될 예정이라고 한다. 이번에는 반론통지를 통해 법적으로 대응할 것이라 한다. sotwe 남자자위

smlnzhl 2025년 8월 13일 16화부터 플러스 작품으로 전환되었다. 이번에 모바일로 나와서 걱정반 기대반으로해봤는데 아주 잘 나왔습니다. 슈에이샤 의 웹코믹 사이트 소년 점프+ 에서 2020년 7월 3일부터 2025년 7월 18일까지 연재되었다. 이번 가이드에서는 게임의 핵심 시스템부터 티어표. 8는 마츠모토 나오야 원작의 인기 만화를 기반으로 한 애니로, 괴수가 난무하는 일본을 배경으로 합니다.

sotwe 07녀 Com › mgallery › board괴수 8호 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 그 방위대원이 되어 사람들을 지키고자 했던 건실한 청년 히비노 카프카는, 생각지도 못한 사건으로 인해 괴수가 되어버리고 마는데. 괴수 8호 편집 자세한 내용은 히비노 카프카 문서를 참고하십시오. Com › family › 212괴수 8호 완결. 괴수 8호는 옛날 카우보이 비밥 이후로제가 주인공에 감명받은 작품입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.