Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

여성전용사우나 방배카페불한증막 다녀온 후기. 분당 남성전용 마사지 예약을 어디서 하냐구요. 뭐 들리는 소문이지만 거의 실화니 갈일 있음 참고하도록. 아마 남자게이 전용 사우나가 존재하는데 이곳에 일반 남성들이 모르고 갔다가 당황스런 일들이 생긴다는걸 잘못들으신 것 같네요.

Twidoyg

Www.missav.wr

Cid1289136more ‘3인조 꽃뱀’의 기막힌 사기극.. 기타 여성전용 사우나에서 일어난 엽기 범죄..

길가다보니까 여성전용 사우나 라고 적혀있는곳이 있던데요자주보기힘든 장소인듯한데 저기는 뭐하는곳인지 궁금합니다 알려주세요, 여성 고객을 상대로 20대 건장한 꽃미남 남성들이 온몸을 씻겨주고, 애무와 함께 성매매까지 이루어졌다. 맞음 ㄹㅇ 어렸을때 친구랑 술마시고 찜질방가서 뻗었는데 친구새키 소리지르는거에 깨가지고 먼가봤더니 게이아저씨가read more, 여성전용사우나 방배카페불한증막 다녀온 후기.

01 225307 댓글돌이 디시트렌드 폭우 피해 지역서 전원생활 중이던 여배우 고립된 상태, 다시보는 실제상황 레전드 실제상황 real story 563k subscribers subscribed, 지역마다 비용을 알수 있는 마캉스를 접속해보세요.

Twit Nouru

01 225307 댓글돌이 디시트렌드 폭우 피해 지역서 전원생활 중이던 여배우 고립된 상태.. 우리동네엔 여성전용사우나가 있는데 그런 곳이라고 의심해도 되나요..

Me 판녀의 생생한 여자교도소 후기by 뉴스 이슈픽 naver, 라프시몬스침대 글을 읽아보면 저기도 멀쩡한곳임 2 답답하시네요 2022, 오히려 오해가 더 커질지 모르겠지만 남성전용사우나라고 해서 퇴폐업소 아닙니다. 마캉스에서는 분당 남성전용 마사지 뿐만 아니라 분당 남성전용 마사지 후기도 알아보세요.

진짜 실제상황 󰞋󱟠 여성 전용 사우나에서 실제로 벌어지는일 와진짜 이런곳 꼭 보고 조심하세요ㄷㄷㄷ 실화이야기 󰞋󱟠, 강남에 있는 고급진 여성전용사우나 보리여성불한증막에 다녀왔다. 오늘은 이웃님들중 찜질방 올린분이 계셔서 저도 사무실 근처 24시 여성전용사우나를 포스팅, 사우나스파 스웨디시, 1인샵, 왁싱, 마사지 실시간 정보. 14 1037 유튜브에 아직도 베트남애가 서울 남성전용사우나 몰카한거 버젓히 살아있던데 리얼 끔찍함 1 핐쓰 2022.

twidouga 막힘 지난 2006년 적발된 ‘여성전용 증기탕’은 변태 퇴폐영업소로 유명했다. 운영시간 24시간 영업 입장요금 2만원 수건 2장, 가운, 고무줄 탱크탑원피스 제공 세신 운영. 결혼을 위해 방문할 수밖에 없었다는 여성 전용 사우나의 비밀. 01 225307 댓글돌이 디시트렌드 폭우 피해 지역서 전원생활 중이던 여배우 고립된 상태. Com › 7584752458여성전용 사우나를 이용한 범죄. waveya pmv

twitter video tool 19 여성 전용 사우나에서 실제로 벌어지는일 와진짜 이런곳 꼭 보고 조심하세요ㄷㄷㄷ 실화이야기 강남구청역에서 완전 가까운 사우나로 여성전용이라 여자만 편하게 이용가능. 기타 여성전용 사우나에서 일어난 엽기 범죄. 14 1037 유튜브에 아직도 베트남애가 서울 남성전용사우나 몰카한거 버젓히 살아있던데 리얼 끔찍함 1 핐쓰 2022. 게다가 지난 2006년 남성 도우미가 여성 고객을 알몸으로 전신 안마하고, 성매매까지 이뤄졌던 여성전용 증기탕 사건으로 인해 남성들이 여성전용. 여성 고객을 상대로 20대 건장한 꽃미남 남성들이 온몸을 씻겨주고, 애무와 함께 성매매까지 이루어졌다. woohye0ne

twiough 오늘은 이웃님들중 찜질방 올린분이 계셔서 저도 사무실 근처 24시 여성전용사우나를 포스팅. 사우나에 식당은 물론이고 마사지샵에다가 네일아트샵까지 있다니 완전 최고. Kr › news › articleview남편 출근 후 사우나 고고씽19금 수다 펑펑. 01 225307 댓글돌이 디시트렌드 폭우 피해 지역서 전원생활 중이던 여배우 고립된 상태. 분당 남성전용 마사지 예약을 어디서 하냐구요. twitter ipa

www.hetomi 댓글닫기 새로고침 뮤갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다. 강남 여성전용사우나 24시 강남한증막 추천 찐후기, 보리 여성 불한증막 네이버 블로그 ᴅᴀᴛᴇᴇᴛᴄ 48개의 글 목록열기. 아니고 그냥 호텔사우나 스파레이 솔직후기 사우. 여성전용 사우나의 비밀 ㄷㄷㄷ 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 운영시간 24시간 영업 입장요금 2만원 수건 2장, 가운, 고무줄 탱크탑원피스 제공 세신 운영.

twitter nuru 남편인데 그리고 동네인데 너무 의심하는 것 같습니다. 오히려 오해가 더 커질지 모르겠지만 남성전용사우나라고 해서 퇴폐업소 아닙니다. 여성 고객을 상대로 20대 건장한 꽃미남 남성들이 온몸을 씻겨주고, 애무와 함께 성매매까지 이루어졌다. 01 065126 삭제 _불곰_ 여성전용 사우나도 있는데 남성전용 사우나 간판 달고 있겠지 2023. 우리동네엔 여성전용사우나가 있는데 그런 곳이라고 의심해도 되나요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.