Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

알고 보니 그 유부녀가 전부터 내가 의심하던 전 남편의 직장 동료였고, 유뷰녀였다. 운영자 250203 공지 여행동남아 갤러리 이용 안내94 운영자 05. Com › bella_h_o_u_s_e벨라 하우스 @bella_h_o_u_s_e instagram photos and videos. 두산 우승 포수가 트레이드 이적이라니서울→창원→대구, 46.

김지연 티팬 라디오스타

나히아 7기

Com › watch베트남 신혼부부 드디어 새집으로 이사 갔습니다 아파트 매매가격만. 운영자 250203 공지 여행동남아 갤러리 이용 안내94 운영자 05. 클래식, 재즈, 월드뮤직 등 다양한 음악 공연과 음반에 대한 리뷰, 정보, 칼럼을 제공합니다, 2022 the viewers have announce.

나이어린 상사 디시

Villa bella vista is located east of the village center of chester, on the north side of old depot road just east of connecticut route 154.. 영국 매체 데일리 메일은 4일한국시간 스페인 주장 알바로 모라타32ac밀란와 앨리스 캄펠로의 이혼 사유가 공개됐다며 유로 2024 결승전 이후.. 알고 보니 그 유부녀가 전부터 내가 의심하던 전 남편의 직장 동료였고, 유뷰녀였다.. 펌 초등교사 부부 아내의 불륜으로 이혼합니다..

티아라 지연과 2024년 11월 합의 이혼한 뒤 처음으로 일상을 공개하는 것. 182 1248 23 0 2214755 이렇게 이목구비 샤프하고 인형 같이 생기고 촌스럽지 않은 2 ㅇㅇ211. 1941년 17세의 나이로 아테네 오페라단 평생단원. 뎀나 바잘리아의 히트 포인트 패션계를 단숨에 사로잡은 베트멍과 발렌시아가의 크리에이티브 디렉터 뎀나 바잘리아.

꼭노 댄스

Org › wiki › villa_bella_vistavilla bella vista wikipedia. On ma, dodd testified before a televised hearing of the u. 1930년 7세의 나이에 음악을 시작. Kr › article › 2025072850924이혼 통보하더니 유뷰녀와 살림 차려&mldr. Com › bella_haus_벨라하우스 책육아하는엄마 집꾸미기 @bella_haus_ instagram.

축구계를 대표하는 잉꼬부부의 충격적인 이혼 사유가 전해졌다. Com 👆욜란다 하디드 자세한 이혼 이야기와 근황은 여기👆. 한눈에 보는 오늘 해외연예 뉴스 헤럴드pop배재련 기자톰 크루즈가 러시아 여자친구와 교제 중인 것으로 확인됐다, Com › salty0salt › 222326657441리얼 하우스와이브스 베버리힐즈의 진짜 주부들 시즌4 근황과 이야기. 19일한국시간 미국 연예매체 페이지 식스 등 외신에 따르면 할리우드 배우 톰 크루즈61는 러시아 사교계 유명 인사인 엘시나 카이로바36로 열애 중이다. 첫째, 둘 다 사랑에 빠진 나이에 영원히 멈춰 있잖아.

Kr › article › 2025072850924이혼 통보하더니 유뷰녀와 살림 차려&mldr.. 리얼 하우스와이브스 오브 베버리힐즈 시즌4 남편 데이비드 포스터와 이혼한 이유.. 758 파타야 라오스 에코 24시간 1 여갤러183.. Org › wiki › villa_bella_vistavilla bella vista wikipedia..

클래식, 재즈, 월드뮤직 등 다양한 음악 공연과 음반에 대한 리뷰, 정보, 칼럼을 제공합니다. 뎀나 바잘리아의 히트 포인트 패션계를 단숨에 사로잡은 베트멍과 발렌시아가의 크리에이티브 디렉터 뎀나 바잘리아. Com › salty0salt › 222326657441리얼 하우스와이브스 베버리힐즈의 진짜 주부들 시즌4 근황과 이야기, 리얼 하우스와이브스 오브 베버리힐즈 시즌4 남편 데이비드 포스터와 이혼한 이유.

김선영 디시 Mbn 돌싱글즈7의 도형, 인형이 첫인상 1순위 명은을 사이에 둔 본격적인 경쟁을 시작하며 신경전에 불을 붙였다. 두산 우승 포수가 트레이드 이적이라니서울→창원→대구, 46. 티아라 지연과 2024년 11월 합의 이혼한 뒤 처음으로 일상을 공개하는 것. Provides a report on the performance of the bellahouse 벨라하우스 channels subscriber ranking, average views, super chat revenue, and paid advertising content. Mbn 돌싱글즈7의 도형, 인형이 첫인상 1순위 명은을 사이에 둔 본격적인 경쟁을 시작하며 신경전에 불을 붙였다. 나오비토 재평가 디시

꼬툭튀 아카이브 당시 삼성은 nc에 2027 kbo 신인드래프트 3라운드 지명권 read more. Com 👆욜란다 하디드 자세한 이혼 이야기와 근황은 여기👆. On ma, dodd testified before a televised hearing of the u. Senate internal security subcommittee siss about covert party infiltration of labor unions and other institutions. Org › wiki › villa_bella_vistavilla bella vista wikipedia. 나미 엉덩이

김태하 누드 Day ago 은퇴한 전 야구선수 황재균이 티아라 지연과 이혼 후 보금자리를 공개한다. Day ago 동아닷컴 최윤나 기자 ‘전지적 참견 시점’에서는 20년 야구 인생의 마침표를 찍은, 전 야구선수 황재균의 럭셔리 싱글 하우스를 최초로. 06, 등 전작에서 이혼한 부모를 주시하는 소녀의 내면을 관찰했던 실린스키는. 프로야구 nc 다이노스 소속이었던 박세혁은 작년 11월 깜짝 트레이드를 통해 삼성으로 이적했다. Com › bella_h_o_u_s_e벨라 하우스 @bella_h_o_u_s_e instagram photos and videos. 나나코모딩

나기 히카루 누드 벨라마리에 하우스웨딩 경기도 용인시 기흥구 석현로12번길 28 이 블로그의 체크인 이 장소의 다른 글 위치는 영통입구쪽에서 용인 흥덕쪽으로 가는 방향에 있다 교통편은 그리 좋지는 않은데 셔틀버스를 운행한다고 알고 있다. 4일 방송된 jtbc 웃고 떠들고 맛있는 하우스에 게스트로 출연한 이하얀이 화제인 가운데, 전 남편 허준호와의 이혼 사유가 재조명되고 있다. 31일 방송하는 mbc 예능프로그램 전지적 참견시점에서는 은퇴를 선언하며 20년 프로 야구 인생을 마무리한 황재균의 백수 라이프가 펼쳐진다. Com › watch베트남 신혼부부 드디어 새집으로 이사 갔습니다 아파트 매매가격만. 티아라 지연과 2024년 11월 합의 이혼한 뒤 처음으로 일상을 공개하는 것.

나는 찬미 실물 06, 등 전작에서 이혼한 부모를 주시하는 소녀의 내면을 관찰했던 실린스키는. On ma, dodd testified before a televised hearing of the u. 4일 방송된 jtbc 웃고 떠들고 맛있는 하우스에 게스트로 출연한 이하얀이 화제인 가운데, 전 남편 허준호와의 이혼 사유가 재조명되고 있다. 티아라 지연과 2024년 11월 합의 이혼한 뒤 처음으로 일상을 공개하는 것. 그렇게 각자의 삶을 살아가던 어느 날 전남편이 내 앞집에 살고있었다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.