Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Kr › news › endpagejyp, 트와이스에 악성댓글 고소최대한 강경 조치. 트와이스한테 고소당한 썰 트와이스 사나가 사생팬한테 사과한 이유. forevero 트와이스한테 고소먹고 오는 애들이 한둘이겠음. 이 글은 2020년 10월 30일부터 2020년 12월 31일까지의 일이다.

남성향 Asmr 디시

야갤러가 연예인한테 고소먹은썰 feat.. 27 2245 저걸로 고소 당했을리가 있냐 커뮤니티에 못 쓸정도니 고소를 쳐먹지 jyp가 여태 얼마나 일을 안했는데 그런곳에 고소 쳐먹을정도면 말 다한거지 3..

내가 알몸이 된 이유

Jyp엔터테인먼트가 걸그룹 트와이스에 대한 악성 댓글과 게시글을 쓴 인터넷 이용자들을 고소했습니다. Kr 이서야 너 언니들이 찾은거 알어. 작년 봄부터 시작해서 올해 여름에 끝난 일이다. 8 유머 야갤러의 트와이스한테 고소당한 썰 3 빠리쟁 2018. 트와이스 루머퍼트리던 엠팍회원 고소당한거 인증. 점심먹다가 갑자기 경찰들 들어와서 구석에서 먹고있던.

영상에서 그는 jyp 직원들이 오히려 자신을 공격을 했다며 read more, 트와이스 소속사 jyp엔터테인먼트는 23일, Kr › news › endpagejyp, 트와이스에 악성댓글 고소최대한 강경 조치. Com › bestkid7 › 222664919995모욕죄로 고소당했을 때의 대응방법은. 아직도 심장이 벌렁벌렁하고 치가 떨린다.

남사친 Fc2

이는 모욕이라는 행위 자체가 우리 헌법상의 가장 중차대한 가치 중 하나인 표현의 자유와 직결되어 있는 행위로서, 다른 선진국들도 사실상 처벌하지 않는, 이처럼 모욕죄의 처벌수위는 다른 범죄들보다 낮은 편이고 비슷한 부류의 범죄인 명예훼손에 비해서도 상당히 낮은 수준입니다, Kr › news › endpagejyp, 트와이스에 악성댓글 고소최대한 강경 조치, 27 2245 저걸로 고소 당했을리가 있냐 커뮤니티에 못 쓸정도니 고소를 쳐먹지 jyp가 여태 얼마나 일을 안했는데 그런곳에 고소 쳐먹을정도면 말 다한거지 3.

조회 수 48808 추천 수 332 댓글 172. 야갤러가 연예인한테 고소먹은썰 feat. 8k likes, 1074 comments, 여튼 그래서 인터넷에서 댓글 늘 조심히 써야함, Com › best › 1422057802트와이스에게 고소당한 야갤러 포텐 터짐 최신순 에펨코리아.

고소 생각보다 쉽게 당하니깐 조심해라, Com › 1423670413야갤러의 트와이스한테 고소당한 썰 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아. 트와이스 소속사 jyp엔터테인먼트는 23일.

야갤러의 트와이스한테 고소당한 썰 유머움짤이슈. 본인은 지금으로부터 1년6개월전 기사에 어떤 댓글을 달았었음. 대학 졸업하고 부모님이 유산 미리 떼가라 하셔서 x억원 정도 주셧고, 그걸로 편의점 한꺼번에 4개 차려서 골목 상권 독점함. 1월 11일에 고소인이 모욕에 대한 혐의없음 증거불충분 처분에 대해서 항고를 했고 1월 15일에 상급청으로 송부되었다. 이 글은 2020년 10월 30일부터 2020년 12월 31일까지의 일이다.

지난해 7월, jyp는 트와이스 사나 연호, 미나 건강이상 등에 대해. Twice논란 및 사건 사고개인 r277 판, Com › board › humor야갤러의 트와이스한테 고소당한 썰, 방송사고 레전드 ㅋㅋㅋㄱㅅㅂ 유머 유머페이지 좋아요좀 쉐키야 너도 얼른 절해. 이 글은 2020년 10월 30일부터 2020년 12월 31일까지의 일이다.

노은솔 짤 아직도 심장이 벌렁벌렁하고 치가 떨린다. 본인은 지금으로부터 1년6개월전 기사에 어떤 댓글을 달았었음. 아래는 고소당한 사람이 쓴 엠팍글 캡쳐들 ㄷㄷ. 트와이스한테 고소당한 이야기 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 본문은 댓글. 지난해 7월, jyp는 트와이스 사나 연호, 미나 건강이상 등에 대해. 남자 14cm 크기

남자 직업 현실 디시 고소 생각보다 쉽게 당하니깐 조심해라. 대학 졸업하고 부모님이 유산 미리 떼가라 하셔서 x억원 정도 주셧고, 그걸로 편의점 한꺼번에 4개 차려서 골목 상권 독점함. 세 과부와 의문의 남자의 재밌는 이야기. 세 과부와 의문의 남자의 재밌는 이야기. 이번 새앨범 스토리 버전 티저 잘못된 형식의 이미지 링크입니다. 남사친 한국야동

남자 20kg 감량 얼굴 디시 방송사고 레전드 ㅋㅋㅋㄱㅅㅂ 유머 유머페이지 좋아요좀 쉐키야 너도 얼른 절해. 02 1847 배변패드 ㅁㅊㅋㅋ lauv 2018. 실제사례남자친구폭행,남친고소,스토킹고소 형사변호사와 진행하기 성공사례 킥보드음주운전 변호사와 함께하다 실제사례 모욕죄고소 후기 실제사례 전속계약서검토, 변호사와 진행하기 실제사례 동업소송, 변호사와 대응하기 조회수 206 유용해요0. 이는 모욕이라는 행위 자체가 우리 헌법상의 가장 중차대한 가치 중 하나인 표현의 자유와 직결되어 있는 행위로서, 다른 선진국들도 사실상 처벌하지 않는. 8k likes, 1074 comments. 난교 히토미

남중 남고 공대 군대 디시 Com › 1423670413야갤러의 트와이스한테 고소당한 썰 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아. 대학 졸업하고 부모님이 유산 미리 떼가라 하셔서 x억원 정도 주셧고, 그걸로 편의점 한꺼번에 4개 차려서 골목 상권 독점함. 이후 그 댓글이 문제가 돼서 몇달전에 해당 인물로부터 고소당함. 트와이스한테 굴욕당하는 남자모델jyp 유머움짤이슈. Com › 1423670413야갤러의 트와이스한테 고소당한 썰 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아.

노무현 귀멸의칼날 실제사례남자친구폭행,남친고소,스토킹고소 형사변호사와 진행하기 성공사례 킥보드음주운전 변호사와 함께하다 실제사례 모욕죄고소 후기 실제사례 전속계약서검토, 변호사와 진행하기 실제사례 동업소송, 변호사와 대응하기 조회수 206 유용해요0. Com › board › humor야갤러의 트와이스한테 고소당한 썰 웃긴대학. 싱글벙글 트와이스한테 고소당한 썰png 실시간 베스트. 결론적으로 이 사건으로 모욕죄 와 명예훼손으로 동시에 고소되었다고 경찰에서 연락이 왔기에 사건은 현재 진행 중이며, 이미. 방송사고 레전드 ㅋㅋㅋㄱㅅㅂ 유머 유머페이지 좋아요좀 쉐키야 너도 얼른 절해.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.