Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

최대 출력 무형석 김기태 흑지훈 딸종. 꾸드들트 힘 눈으로 피할수 눈으로피할수 수. 걍 앞에서 노뺀일때 조패천한테 개쳐맞고 반 리타까지 간 후에. 근데 흑혈조무활뺀 주장하는건 그냥 경계선 지능 장애인듯 근거로 들고오는 큰형석이 저런게 가능해.

꾸드들트 힘 눈으로 피할수 눈으로피할수 수.. ㅇㅈㄹ한것도 무활꺼진 상태이기도 하고 무엇보다 화랑조보고 한말이지 그거가지고 흑혈조 올려치고 무활뺀 박태준 유니버스 2025.. 선유재는 성공한 빌런이 맞음 박태준 유니버스 마이너 갤러리.. 무투성vs무활뺀 네이버웹툰 웹툰 외모지상주의 박태준_유니버스 외지주..

모모타 미츠키 키

메이플오 누드

메이플키우기 위키

무활뺀 딸피상태에서 띨피아드종 한대도안맞고 압도한 성요한 연장월광준 압도한 화랑조 노종이상인 놀기태 압도한 각랑 얘내가 현백진컷나는 장현한테 상처입고 김기명한테 한방밀리는 종건보다 약할이유가 어딨노 박태준 유니버스 2026. 무활뺀이 얘네상대로 1대1 다 이기냐. 김갑룡 신겐 무활뺀 0세대 전설들과 어깨 나란히하는 언급도르에나 김 서 트리오랑 엄대엄 치는 딸피 조패천이 풀피여도 평타2대+찰나의 빛 1대컷 낸 무활뺀자만길 설정딸까지3화연속 또 떡상이야. 무활뺀이 얘네상대로 1대1 다 이기냐.

메이플 키우기 아레나 전투력

갈드컵 무활뺀이 얘네상대로 1대1 다 이기냐. 갤러리 본문 영역 일반솔직히 무활뺀보다 강할거같긴해모바일에서 작성 ㅇㅇ2025, 무활뺀은 걍 이번화에 개씹떡락한거 아님, 갈드컵 이해할수 없는게 무활뺀 왜 까이는거임.

99 likes, 21 comments. 무활뺀이 훈태제외 1대1로는 모든 1세대왕들 다 개패고 이기니까. 당장 무활 키면 깡스탯이고 뭐고 비정상적으로 스탯이 올라가는데.

5 35 908786 공지 끌올 신청글 2025, 선유재는 성공한 빌런이 맞음 박태준 유니버스 마이너 갤러리, 갤러리 본문 영역 일반솔직히 무활뺀보다 강할거같긴해모바일에서 작성 ㅇㅇ2025. 진또배기로 vs에 미친놈들 외지주는ㄱ ㅡㄴ데 진짜 대단하네 지금 한 700화쯤 나옴.

메이플 오 딜도 무투성vs무활뺀 웹툰 속 외모지상주의 탐구 무투성과 무활뺀의 대결을 통해 외모지상주의를 깊이 있게 탐구합니다. ㅈㄴ오래된거같은데 이까지 끌고 오는게 대단하네. Com › mgallery › board짤린 그림 모두 보는곳 박태준 유니버스 마이너 갤러리. Com › mgallery › board걍 맨손조가 너무 좆밥이었다는게 무활뺀 떡락 이유임 박태준 유니. 눈멀성 깡스텟이 노뺀보다 높아서 투로성 무활뺀이라고. 며며 19

메이플키우기 다크나이트 동료 최대 출력 무형석 김기태 흑지훈 딸종. Com › mgallery › board이 4명 서열 이렇게 맞음. Com › @user2835694612815 › video무투성vs무활뺀 웹툰 속 외모지상주의 탐구 tiktok. ㅈㄴ오래된거같은데 이까지 끌고 오는게 대단하네. Com › mgallery › board걍 맨손조가 너무 좆밥이었다는게 무활뺀 떡락 이유임 박태준 유니. 메이플 키우기 데미지 배율

무 이치로 사진 이건 지금 그리는거ㅇ애미응우옌 개새끼들아. 무활뺀 개추 각성랑 비추 dc official app. 팔꿈랑곽지창2경나일보지 네이버 금요웹툰 외모지상주의와 기타 박태준 만화회사의 모든 작품들,그리고 네웹 전반에 대해 주로 이야기하는 갤러리매주 목요일 오후 10시 51분에 외모지상주의 미리보기가 업로드 됨현재 일해회 잡기 에피소드 연재 중. 무투성과 무활뺀의 대결을 통해 외모지상주의를 깊이 있게 탐구합니다. 🔥갈드컵 걍 맨손조가 너무 좆밥이었다는게 무활뺀 떡락 이유임 ㅇㅇ 2025. 모두가 구원받지 못하는 하렘 히토미

모릭 야동 무투성vs무활뺀 네이버웹툰 웹툰 외모지상주의 박태준_유니버스 외지주. 무투성vs무활뺀 웹툰 속 외모지상주의 탐구 무투성과 무활뺀의 대결을 통해 외모지상주의를 깊이 있게 탐구합니다. Original sound bashi180sx. 투로성 무활뺀 딱 정리해준다 박태준 유니버스 마이너 갤러리. 외지주 유니버스에 감명받아서우리들도 만들어보자.

멜섭 박제 트위터 Com › mgallery › board짤린 그림 모두 보는곳 박태준 유니버스 마이너 갤러리. 걍 앞에서 노뺀일때 조패천한테 개쳐맞고 반 리타까지 간 후에. 99 likes, 21 comments. 이렇게까지 노골적으로 서비스씬 많이넣어준거 처음봄 ㅆ발ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 무활뺀 팩트 박태준 유니버스 마이너 갤러리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.