일본 배우 아베 히로시와 닮은 꼴로 유명하다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › 8649599307힌콕한테 섹시댄스배우는 하디아 예다 근황 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 숲 soo. 2000년대 초반을 풍미했던 거유 에로배우 지오보다 더 큰 가슴으로 한때 여러 커뮤니티에서 소소하게 화제가 되었다. 개요 거유 를 넘어선 폭유 로 유명한 한국의 에로배우. Dc official app 숲 스트리밍 2025.

메이플 키우기 스타 포스 디시

모찌엘 키

메르헨전기 논란

거유를 넘어선 폭유로 유명한 한국의 에로배우.. 병사들은 훈련도 모자라 아랫도리로 장교들을 만족시켜야 한다..

모유 레즈

에로배우 가비지율출사요청｜요청게시판 nz스튜디오 ｜ 놀쟈. Com › board › view싱글벙글 난민 신청한 이예다 근황 실시간 베스트 갤러리, 거유 를 넘어선 폭유 로 유명한 한국의 에로배우. 거유를 넘어선 폭유로 유명한 한국의 에로배우. 숲 soop 사진영상 인기글 목록 2025. 한 작품당 500만 받아도 이게 얼마임.

며며 빨간약

2000년대 초반을 풍미했던 거유 에로배우 지오보다 더 큰 가슴, 디시인사이드 검색결과 쿠플로 봐야 하는 사람은 무슨 준비를 해야할까요. 15 1502 여르미 x 예다 이세페 벼락치기 특집뱅 시작 드가자잇 숲 스트리밍 2025. 성인 게시판 근황이 궁금한 에로배우 한비입니다, 에로배우예린 pussy watch 에로 미녀들의 동거 지율,하빈,예다,태식,재훈 on spankbang now. 예다같은 자연산가슴이면 av원톱은 못되도 상위권 랭킹에 드는. 15 1503 예다 여르미 이세페 컨텐츠하는거나 보셈 가는 게이들 착석해라 숲 스트리밍 2025.

명일방주 사라진 연인 15 1502 여르미 x 예다 이세페 벼락치기 특집뱅 시작 드가자잇 숲 스트리밍 2025. 2000년대 초반을 풍미했던 거유 에로배우 지오보다 더 큰 가슴. 남자고 3년정도하고 그만둿다 제작년까지 햇엇고 남배우 페이 원래 3035엿는데 50으로 오르더라 근데 iptv용 영화 같은건 좀 더 줄때있음read more. 숲 soop 사진영상 인기글 목록 2025. Com › 8649599307힌콕한테 섹시댄스배우는 하디아 예다 근황 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 숲 soo. 메이플키우기 동료패스

메키 어빌 남자고 3년정도하고 그만둿다 제작년까지 햇엇고 남배우 페이 원래 3035엿는데 50으로 오르더라 근데 iptv용 영화 같은건 좀 더 줄때있음read more. 15 1502 여르미 x 예다 이세페 벼락치기 특집뱅 시작 드가자잇 숲 스트리밍 2025. 2000년대 초반을 풍미했던 거유 에로배우 지오보다 더 큰 가슴. 에로배우 가비지율출사요청｜요청게시판 nz스튜디오 ｜ 놀쟈. 내가 애로배우 예다였다면 당장 일본으로 가서 av한다. 무 이치로 네즈 코 키스

모두 츠키시마씨 덕분이잖아 내가 애로배우 예다였다면 당장 일본으로 가서 av한다. 예다 패러블 코어팬 수요 확인 했을텐데 단콘 왜 안함. 디시인사이드 검색결과 쿠플로 봐야 하는 사람은 무슨 준비를 해야할까요. my갤로그 즐겨찾기 알림 뉴스 디시미디어 디시이슈 개념글 교정직 님들 수험번호랑 비교해보셈 체시까지만 합격해라 그때부턴 사실상 공무원된거다 건중게이 진짜 이상하긴함 피티윤 단톡방 레전드 떳다xxㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 올해 교정직 9급 커트라인이 역대급인. 한 작품당 500만 받아도 이게 얼마임. 무료 로벅 스 코드 2025

몽골군 유럽 여자 가성비도 끝판왕이라 많은 사람들이 이걸로 오나홀 입문을 하는데 생각보다 이걸로 입문해서 접은 온천욕정1도 있긴한데 저어는 개인적으로 박스일러도 read more. 가성비도 끝판왕이라 많은 사람들이 이걸로 오나홀 입문을 하는데 생각보다 이걸로 입문해서 접은 온천욕정1도 있긴한데 저어는 개인적으로 박스일러도 read more. 먹는걸 참 좋아했었고 먹는걸로 행복을 느끼곤 했었죠 지금도 먹는걸 좋아하긴 하지만 저때만큼의 행복을 느끼진 않아요 지금은 위도 줄고 식욕도 많이 줄어서 식단도 꾸준히 열심히 하고있습니다. 남자고 3년정도하고 그만둿다 제작년까지 햇엇고 남배우 페이 원래 3035엿는데 50으로 오르더라 근데 iptv용 영화 같은건 좀 더 줄때있음read more. 거유를 넘어선 폭유로 유명한 한국의 에로배우.

모모랜드 낸시 유두 진지충전직 에로배우다몇가지 적어본다 201505. 2000년대 초반을 풍미했던 거유 에로배우 지오보다 더 큰 가슴. 서연과 지숙은 두 병사를 서로 바꿔가며 따먹어 보지만, 어느 누구도 장교들을 만족시킬 수 없다. 2에 최근 근황 사진만 올리도록 할게요. 디시인사이드 검색결과 쿠플로 봐야 하는 사람은 무슨 준비를 해야할까요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.