Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

구잘, 몰디브에서 오렌지 비키니 자태 공개 여신. 이번 여름, 구잘처럼 자신감 있는 컬러와 감각적인 스타일링으로 해변의 주인공이 되어보는 건 어떨까. 그녀는 겨자색 비키니 차림으로 풍만한 몸매를 과시하고 있다. Com › 7891201532우즈벡 구잘 인스타 업로드 비키니 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아.

망가보는곳

마이데일리 고향미 기자 우즈베키스탄 출신 방송인 구잘이 근황을 공개했다.. 구잘은 지난 20일 자신의 sns에 보라색 비키니에 화이트 셔츠를 매치한 모습을 공유했다..

맹숙 남친

마법노출소뇨

김태희 보고 있나우즈벡 구잘, 비키니 입고.. 토리님이 최근에 힘든 일 겪으신 걸로 알고 있습니다..

마쓰사카 데리헤루

지난 7일 구잘이 자신의 sns에 몰디브 추억이라는 글과 함께 사진을 게재했다, 구잘, 김태희도 놀랄 섹시한 비키니 몸매압도적 글래머 헤럴드pop 원문 기사전송 20250110 0649 ai챗으로 요약 헤럴드pop배재련 기자 구잘이 몰디브에서 섹시한 비키니를 입고 글래머 몸매를 한껏 자랑해 화제다, 우즈벡 김태희 글래머가 이정도구잘, 섹시 비키니, 사진 속 구잘은 화이트 색상의 비키니를 입고 있는 모습으로 은근한 볼륨감과 늘씬한 몸매를 자랑해 눈길을 끌었다, 아시아경제 온라인이슈팀 우즈베키스탄 출신 방송인 구잘이 하와이에서 비키니 몸매를 뽐냈다, 구잘, 몰디브서 비키니 자태 공개 미수다 여신.

서울뉴시스황소정 인턴 기자 우즈베키스탄 출신 여행 유튜버 투르수노바 구잘39이 여유로운 일상을 공개했다. Com › ent › article‘우즈벡 김태희’ 구잘, 오렌지빛 비키니 자태 ‘눈부시네’ da&starf, 13 1312 댓글 0 정시환 기자 다른 기사, 우즈벡 김태희 구잘, 손바닥만한 비키니 입은.

말왕 Pd

홈 연예 연예일반 연예일반 구잘, 몰디브서 뽐낸 럭셔리한 10등신 글래머 비키니 자태 신영선 기자 입력 2024. 구잘, 몰디브 해변에서 섹시한 비키니 자랑. 우즈벡 출신 방송인 구잘이 굴곡진 몸매를 자랑했다. 구잘은 몰디브의 한 고급 리조트의 해변가에서 여유로운 시간을 즐기고 있다.

망가 사이트 모음 이번 여름, 구잘처럼 자신감 있는 컬러와 감각적인 스타일링으로 해변의 주인공이 되어보는 건 어떨까. 토리님이 최근에 힘든 일 겪으신 걸로 알고 있습니다. 우즈벡 김태희 구잘, 아찔한 비키니 자태몰디브. 우즈벡 김태희 글래머가 이정도구잘, 섹시 비키니. 사진 속 구잘은 햇살 아래 빛나는 오렌지색 비키니를 입고 늘씬한 몸매를 자랑하며 아름다운 몰디브 바다를 배경으로 포즈를 취하고 있다. 맥심잡지 보는법

막시모 가르시아 홈 연예 연예일반 연예일반 구잘, 몰디브서 뽐낸 럭셔리한 10등신 글래머 비키니 자태 신영선 기자 입력 2024. 8일 우즈베크 출신 방송인 구잘은 자신의 소셜 계정을 통해 maldivesislands maldives. 우즈베키스탄 출신 방송인 구잘이 하와이에서 비키니 몸매를 뽐냈다. 특히 독특한 색깔의 비키니를 완벽히 소화한 글래머러스한 몸매가 감탄을. 미녀들의 수다1로 얼굴을 알린 구잘은 이후 드라마 황금물고기, 옥탑방 왕세자, 황금거탑 등에 출연했으며 현재도 방송인으로 활발히 활동. 마비노기 모바일 사양 디시

말왕 ㄱㅊ ‘우즈벡 김태희’ 구잘, 손바닥만한 비키니 입은 글래머‥몰디브 여신인 줄 20250201 171921 뉴스엔 이하나 기자 우즈베키스탄 출신 방송인 구잘 투르수노바가 비키니 자태를 뽐냈다. 이번 사진 속 구잘은 오렌지색 비키니를 입고 아름다운 해변을 배경으로 인증샷을 남겼다. 사진 속 구잘은 바다가 한 눈에 보이는 수영장에서 화이트 비키니를 입고 여유로운 시간을 보내고 있는 모습이다. 몸매 라인을 따라 흘러내리는 긴 머리와 함께 탄탄하고 매끈한 등 라인이 시선을 사로잡는다. Com › kokr › entertainment‘우즈벡 김태희’ 구잘, 손바닥만한 비키니 입은 글래머&nldr. 말킥 라이브 다시보기

맥심 리사 구잘, 김태희도 놀랄 섹시한 비키니 몸매압도적 글래머 헤럴드pop 원문 기사전송 20250110 0649 ai챗으로 요약 헤럴드pop배재련 기자 구잘이 몰디브에서 섹시한 비키니를 입고 글래머 몸매를 한껏 자랑해 화제다. 공개된 사진 속 구잘은 푸른 바다를 배경으로 비키니를 입고 앉아 포즈를 취하고 있다. 구잘, 몰디브에서 비현실적 비키니 자태 공개우즈벡 김태희의 근황 우즈베키스탄 출신 방송. 우즈벡 출신 방송인 구잘이 굴곡진 몸매를 자랑했다. 포토 우즈베키스탄 여신 구잘, 비키니 완벽 소화.

마키마 방귀 Com › view › nisx20250110_0003028124우즈벡 김태희 구잘, 손바닥만 한 비키니 입고 아찔. 선글라스로 얼굴을 가렸음에도 여전한 미모가 돋보인다. 사진에서 구잘은 섹시한 비키니를 입고 미소와 함께 포즈를 취하고 있다. 우즈벡 김태희 구잘, 손바닥만 한 비키니 입고 아찔. 완벽한 몸매 라인이 드러나는 가운데, 섹시하면서도 상큼한 분위기가 눈길을.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.