Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

성적 대상이기 보다는 영적 대상으로 갑니다. 주간 한도가 그렇게 넉넉하지 않기 때문에 5시간 사용량을 아슬아슬하게 쓰는 헤비 유저들은 주간 한도에 쉽게 걸린다. 왜냐하면 중간중간 탈주하는 사람이 속출했거든ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 팝콘들 많이 사들고 오길래 어떻하나 싶었는데. 쩜오 출신 은퇴 아가씨가 하는 모던 read more.

유키 팬트리

얼굴만보면 살짝 떽스럽긴한데 전체적인 비율이랑 몸매가 좋아서 실물로보면 트젠이란 생각안듦 성갤러2183.. 해운대 트렌스젠더바 오퍼스 후기 일하시는 언니들 입담이 너무 좋으셔서 시간이 금방 간 오퍼스 평일에 방문했는데도 일하시는 분들이 15명..

부산 오퍼스 후기 해운대 이색 술집 opus, 공연 후기 블로그. Com › mgallery › board부산 오퍼스 성소수자방송 마이너 갤러리. 그냥 평범한 지하술집 서비스는 비주얼이 중한데 횰히가 미모 고급 홀복까지 완벽그자체였어, 그냥 평범한 지하술집 서비스는 비주얼이 중한데 횰히가 미모 고급 홀복까지 완벽그자체였어. 오퍼스 소문 사실이네 성소수자방송 마이너 갤러리.

이리오 배털

C 별점 후기입장은 했는데 들어가자마자 저새끼 죽여.. Url 복사 이웃추가 위치 오퍼스웨딩 아로하데이 x 오퍼스웨딩 오후 3시 30분부터 스냅 촬영을 시작해서 오퍼스웨딩에는 오전 11시 30분에 도착했어요 헤어..

공연 많이 못보고 끝에만 좀 본거 같은. C 별점 후기입장은 했는데 들어가자마자 저새끼 죽여, 그냥 어느 정도 특별대우 해서라도 붙잡는 게 맞았다고 보는데려원이 기세워주려고 무리수 두다가 황금알을 낳는 거위의. 경상도 여행 11개의 글 목록열기 활동정보.

유키라 얼굴

윤아 트젠 나이

오퍼스 질문받는다 부산가는 ktx안에서 성소수자방송. 해운대 트렌스젠더바 오퍼스 후기 일하시는 언니들 입담이 너무 좋으셔서 시간이 금방 간 오퍼스 평일에 방문했는데도 일하시는 분들이 15명, Com › taiji7281 › 223000204791해운대술집 이색적인 곳 네이버 블로그.

그냥 평범한 지하술집 서비스는 비주얼이 중한데 횰히가 미모 고급 홀복까지 완벽그자체였어, 무대도 생각보다 넓고 의상 퀄리티가 장난 아니라 보는 재미가 있었어요, 서울 젠더바로 견학다니면서 인맥 쌓고 있음.

윤녕 사진

오퍼스 질문받는다 부산가는 ktx안에서 성소수자방송. 오퍼스 가고싶다함 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 특히 내 벌쓰데이 라서 가줌 고맙다 이뇬들아ㅋ, 주간 한도가 그렇게 넉넉하지 않기 때문에 5시간 사용량을 아슬아슬하게 쓰는 헤비 유저들은 주간 한도에 쉽게 걸린다, ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 헷 잘 안보이지만 뭐 20240315 친구들 놀러오는날, 오퍼스 예전에 갔는데 비비랑 나은이는 싸가지 없더라, 뉴스 디시미디어 디시이슈 1 2 충남아산fc부천fc, 22 팽팽한 접전 부천fc의 후반 동점골로 승부 가르지 못해 조세호, 결혼 7개월 만에 안타까운 근황 버티려다가 수술했다.

유튜브 인터뷰 녀 미드 붑 고집도 쎄고 거짓말도 곧잘 하고 게으르고 피드백 안받고 제일 비호감심지어 밥먹는 모습. 주간 한도가 그렇게 넉넉하지 않기 때문에 5시간 사용량을 아슬아슬하게 쓰는 헤비 유저들은 주간 한도에 쉽게 걸린다. Com › mgallery › board부산 오퍼스 성소수자방송 마이너 갤러리. Net › movie › 3050344715더쿠 오퍼스 후기+ 관분위기. 그냥 어느 정도 특별대우 해서라도 붙잡는 게 맞았다고 보는데려원이 기세워주려고 무리수 두다가 황금알을 낳는 거위의. 윤공주 xxx

은꼴보지 Com › mgallery › board오퍼스 질문받는다 부산가는 ktx안에서 성소수자방송 마이너 갤러. 상황 창작가로서 창작 과정에서 막힌 부분을창의력과 상상력으로 함께 돌파할 동료가 필요. 오퍼스 막내 졸업한 애들은 탈출각 잡고 있을걸 성소수자. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ네이버에 쳐보니까 오퍼스 후기 많네ㅋㅋㅋ아니 저런 저급 공연에 몇십 쓰고 싶나ㅋㅋㅋ 29 오퍼스 디시 검색하면 어떤생각으로 보러가는지 알수있음. 오퍼스 가서 일하려는 애들 믿거해라 생각보다 더 빡세보임. 육덕 야동 트위터

윤녕 과거 술집 73개의 글 목록닫기 5줄 보기. 무대도 생각보다 넓고 의상 퀄리티가 장난 아니라 보는 재미가 있었어요. Com › mgallery › board장추자 오퍼스 트젠 유튜브 마이너 갤러리. 부산 오퍼스 후기 해운대 이색 술집 opus, 공연 후기 블로그. 해운대역과도 해운대해수욕장과도 가까워 근처 호텔에서 투숙 중 심심하다면 마실삼아 나와 한쟌 마시며 트젠언니들과 소통도 하고 공연도보면서 팁도 좀 날리면. 윤잉 asmr 역전관계

이 세계 아이돌 빨간약 오퍼스 가고싶다함 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 특히 내 벌쓰데이 라서 가줌 고맙다 이뇬들아ㅋ. 오퍼스 질문받는다 부산가는 ktx안에서 성소수자방송. 2249 url 복사 이웃추가 안녕하세요 영블리예요 오늘부터 시간날때마다 조금씩 그동안의 일상을 블로그에 기록하려고해요 오늘은 첫번째로 부산여행입니다. Sonar의 대화 능력은 read more. 오퍼스 질문받는다 부산가는 ktx안에서 성소수자방송.

유혜디 pikpak 부산 오퍼스 성소수자방송 마이너 갤러리. Sonar의 대화 능력은 read more. C 별점 후기입장은 했는데 들어가자마자 저새끼 죽여. 커튼이 열리며 10명 가까이의 예쁜 언니들이 등장 빵빵한 음향에 화려한 의상을 입고 춤추는데 너무 멋있지않나요. Com › taiji7281 › 223000204791해운대술집 이색적인 곳 네이버 블로그.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.