Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Istp 남자 꼬시기는 단순하지만 깊이 있는 사람입니다. 자기일 잘하는 사람 좋아하고 물질적인 세속적인 가치 추구하는 사람은 경멸하는 편. 한쪽이 엄청좋아하는거 티내는데 한쪽은 관심없어도 걍 같이 붙어다님 여친을 사귄다해도 여사친한테 다 보고함 5개월 전. 한쪽이 엄청좋아하는거 티내는데 한쪽은 관심없어도 걍 같이 붙어다님 여친을 사귄다해도 여사친한테 다 보고함 5개월 전.

그러니까 의도하지 않게 밀당해서 멀어지는데아 내가 그냥 들이.. 한쪽이 엄청좋아하는거 티내는데 한쪽은 관심없어도 걍 같이 붙어다님 여친을 사귄다해도 여사친한테 다 보고함 5개월 전..

Sone-968 Missav.ai

알고 있는게 많거나 혹은 아는게 없더라도 상대의 지식을 존중할 줄 알아야함. 🌟 인스티즈instiz 이성 사랑방, 그가 편하게 느끼는 사람으로 스며든다면, 어느새 그는 당신 옆에서 조용히 웃고 있을지도 몰라요. 근데 남자는 진짜 외모가 자기 스타일 아니면 본선사귀는거에 진출 못하는게 맞는거 같아 나는 불가능하다고 생각하는 쪽. 사바사겠지만 자의든 타의든 남자는 어릴때부터 이성을 꼬시기위한 노력,전략,정보수집, 실패했을때 원인분석 이런거에 엄청익숙해져있는데물론 성공. Istp인데 istp꼬시는 법은 쉽다 자연스럽게 접근해서 안면트고 알고지내는 시간을 늘리고 성격 좋은척하고 본인의 존재감을 알리면됨.

나한테 관심없어보이는 남자 꼬시기 가능하다 vs 불가능하다, 내 남편 istp 1등이네 어쩐지 연애할때 무지 꼬시기 힘들었어, Com › 6709233662남자 꼬시는게 재밌는 인스티즈녀.

Sotwe 본디지

인프제 꼬시기 쉽지 않아요 ㅎㅎ 하지만 그럼에도 할수 있는거라면 인내심을 가지고 한결같이 변함없는 진심을 다하는 것. 이런 사람들은 이성을 함부로 사귀지도 않아, 꼬시기 어려운사람 어떤사람이라고 생각해. 매번 애매해 플러팅해도 모르고 플러팅 할줄도 모르고하 이런남자 어떻게 꼬셔야함.

Istp 남자 꼬시기는 단순하지만 깊이 있는 사람입니다, 🌟 인스티즈instiz 이성 사랑방. 근데 진짜 쥰녜 못하겠음 지금 몇개월째 썸인듯 걍 데이트상대인듯 한 관계임. 더 디테일하게 원하시면 대화 예시나 상황별 전략도 알려드릴게요. 남자가 평균이면 꼬시기 어려운 이유 남자는 23정도 되는 애들도 지들이 평균이라 착각해서 꼭 비슷한 애들끼리 도토리 키재기 외모 비교함.

Sotwe Y2ppii

Com › 6709233662남자 꼬시는게 재밌는 인스티즈녀, 이런 사람들은 이성을 함부로 사귀지도 않아, Net › name › 45419662모솔 남성 꼬시기 개어려움 인스티즈 instiz 이성 사랑방 카테고. Istp인데 istp꼬시는 법은 쉽다 자연스럽게 접근해서 안면트고 알고지내는 시간을 늘리고 성격 좋은척하고 본인의 존재감을 알리면됨.

이성 사랑방 내 인생 최고로 꼬시기 어려운 남자.. 남자가 평균이면 꼬시기 어려운 이유 남자는 23정도 되는 애들도 지들이 평균이라 착각해서 꼭 비슷한 애들끼리 도토리 키재기 외모 비교함.. 모순적으로 보일 수 있지만, 상상력이 풍부하면서도 결단력이 있으며, 야망이 있지만 대외적으로 표현하지 않으며, 놀랄 만큼 호기심이 많지만 쓸데없는 데 에너지를 낭비 read more.. 사친인데 짝사랑한지는 꽤 됐어이제 마침 둘다 솔로고 주변 보면 인티제는 엄청 직진해야된다고 하던데원래 우리가 친구 관계여서 그런가 그러기가 쉽지가 않아 ㅠ..

Sonming Porno

매번 애매해 플러팅해도 모르고 플러팅 할줄도 모르고하 이런남자 어떻게 꼬셔야함. 꼬시기 어려운사람 어떤사람이라고 생각해, 인티제 남자 꼬시기 왜 이렇게 어렵냐 ㅠ.

타인을 향한 연민과 동정심이 있으면서도 가족이나 친구를 보호할 때는 단호하고 가차 없는 모습을 보인다, 그러니까 의도하지 않게 밀당해서 멀어지는데아 내가 그냥 들이. 꼬시기 힘든 남자 유형이라는데 다들 납득 됨.

Net › name › 53979981내 인생 최고로 꼬시기 어려운 남자 인스티즈 instiz 이성 사랑방. 적당히 웃으면서 리액션만 해줘도 남자들은 쉽게 착각함 ㅋㅋ 거기다가 적당한 빈틈 모자름을 보여주면 더더욱 쉽게 빠지지 2분 전. 남자 특징을 적자면 청결에 예민, 깔끔함 완벽주의자 성향이라 뭐든 확실히 실수 없이 끝. Com › 86glryd › 223443007993infj 남자 꼬시기궁합조심할것정말 어려운 너 네이버 블로그.

sotwe movie×scene 매번 애매해 플러팅해도 모르고 플러팅 할줄도 모르고하 이런남자 어떻게 꼬셔야함. 여기 이성 사랑방 보면 여자들이 남자 꼬시는 방법을 어려워. 더 디테일하게 원하시면 대화 예시나 상황별 전략도 알려드릴게요. Net › name › 45419662모솔 남성 꼬시기 개어려움 인스티즈 instiz 이성 사랑방 카테고. 적당히 웃으면서 리액션만 해줘도 남자들은 쉽게 착각함 ㅋㅋ 거기다가 적당한 빈틈 모자름을 보여주면 더더욱 쉽게 빠지지 2분 전. sotwe phong

spankbang korea 그가 편하게 느끼는 사람으로 스며든다면, 어느새 그는 당신 옆에서 조용히 웃고 있을지도 몰라요. @@ 너랑 내얘기잖아 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ mbti 공감 intp istp. 타인을 향한 연민과 동정심이 있으면서도 가족이나 친구를 보호할 때는 단호하고 가차 없는 모습을 보인다. 이런 사람들 실생활을 read more. 나한테 관심없어보이는 남자 꼬시기 가능하다 vs 불가능하다. sotwe 교배프레스

snaptokyo eporner 🌟 인스티즈instiz 이성 사랑방. 이런 사람들 실생활을 read more. 매번 애매해 플러팅해도 모르고 플러팅 할줄도 모르고하 이런남자 어떻게 꼬셔야함. 내 남편 istp 1등이네 어쩐지 연애할때 무지 꼬시기 힘들었어. 꼬시기 힘든 남자 유형이라는데 다들 납득 됨. sotwe 하랑

spankbang.xom 매번 애매해 플러팅해도 모르고 플러팅 할줄도 모르고하 이런남자 어떻게 꼬셔야함. 근데 진짜 쥰녜 못하겠음 지금 몇개월째 썸인듯 걍 데이트상대인듯 한 관계임. 이런 사람들은 이성을 함부로 사귀지도 않아. 이런 사람들은 이성을 함부로 사귀지도 않아. 이런 사람들은 이성을 함부로 사귀지도 않아.

sotwe ssrpeach 인프제 꼬시기 쉽지 않아요 ㅎㅎ 하지만 그럼에도 할수 있는거라면 인내심을 가지고 한결같이 변함없는 진심을 다하는 것. Net › name › 53979981내 인생 최고로 꼬시기 어려운 남자 인스티즈 instiz 이성 사랑방. 근데 남자는 진짜 외모가 자기 스타일 아니면 본선사귀는거에 진출 못하는게 맞는거 같아 나는 불가능하다고 생각하는 쪽. Istp 남자 꼬시기는 단순하지만 깊이 있는 사람입니다. 내 남편 istp 1등이네 어쩐지 연애할때 무지 꼬시기 힘들었어.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.