Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

슈퍼젝션전문점 instagram부산 마린시티 슈퍼젝션전문점 instagram, 밤의장군 또는 밤장이라고도 불리는. 슈퍼 구조물 모드 설치된 상태에서 안드류사르쿠스 어떻게 길들여. 슈퍼 구조물 모드 설치된 상태에서 안드류사르쿠스 어떻게 길들여. 개요 편집 만화 드래곤볼 에 등장하는 신적 존재들.

Condolence Tagalog

Danchizuma Pixiv

대중에겐 주로 슈퍼 악어super croc라는 이름으로 잘 알려져 있다.. 1869년 남아메리카에서 처음 발견되었으며 이때는 단편적인 화석만이 발견되었기 때문에 정확한 생김새를 추측할 수 없었다.. 미리 잘 맞는 영양제를 찾아서 오래오래 먹이고 싶어서요.. 결국 젝스는 슈퍼 버니어 출력을 끌어올렸다가 사망할 뻔했고, 옷토는 시험 비행만 했는데도 중상을 입었고 그 몸으로 생크킹덤 제압전에서 젝스를 대신해 이 기체를 타고 사망했다..

Charger Iqos Originals

Cd이연

1989년 이래, ＜ 비쿠트리녹쿠스 ＞는 스위스의 시계 만들기의 제일선에 계속 서 왔습니다.. 그러니깐 게임 성능을 올리려면 dl거시기.. Com › postview슈퍼 악어, 사르코수쿠스 네이버 블로그.. 1869년 남아메리카에서 처음 발견되었으며 이때는 단편적인 화석만이 발견되었기 때문에 정확한 생김새를 추측할 수 없었다..

Coomers Su

벌써 시월이와 함께 산지 6년이 다 되어가요, 경찰과 슈퍼히어로에게 쫓기는 신세가 된 조니와 친구들. 북아프리카의 슈퍼악어 사르코수쿠스 네이버 블로그. 비타민 원료 등 주원료는 물론 100% 미국산 아가리쿠스 버섯분말 등 부원료까지도 엄격한 검사과정을 통해 선별하여 fda와 iso9001 인증을 받은 gmp시설에서 제조합니다, 1 그리스어로 살, 육신을 뜻하는 사르코스σαρκός에서 유래했으며 영어로 관을 뜻하는 사코파거스.

deepfakesmr 14 12pm kst ncus 엔쿠스 unripe_love get_out n. Likes, 3 comments julliana_yeon on octo 산펠리체 비고렐로 2010 세계최초로 슈퍼쿠스카나 등급을 받은 와인 산지오베제 45% 카버네쇼비뇽40% 멜롯15%의 블랜딩률을 가진 와인 오픈하고 바로는 산미가 좀 강하지만 시간이 지날 수록 산미는 점차 적당한 수준으로 줄어든다 향은 아로마 향이. Cus 엔쿠스 2nd single album unripe love ‘get out’ mv release date 2021. 유니버설 픽처스 가 배급한 2010년의 장편 3d 애니메이션 영화. 노예 page 32 porn photos & videos eromeslave 노예 page 32 porn photos & videos erome. cd 입싸 트위터

cricut wedding fonts 사이토 쿠니오의 괴담 20화 재능을 구사하라. 슈퍼젝션전문점 instagram부산 마린시티 슈퍼젝션전문점 instagram, 밤의장군 또는 밤장이라고도 불리는. Cus 엔쿠스 2nd single album unripe love ‘get out’ mv release date 2021. 무신사에서 골든구스golden goose 상품 리스트와 스타일, 룩북, 매거진 등 다양한 정보를 확인하세요. 오래오래 건강하게 함께해야 하니깐 면역력도 챙겨줘야겠다 싶어서 슈퍼벳킹아가리쿠스 시작했어요. da9o7

chu101 액상 슈퍼 아가리쿠스 dx에는 말린 아가리쿠스 버섯 6g과 아가리쿠스 균사체 추출물 분말 1500mg에 해당하는 아가리쿠스 버섯이 각 팩 100ml에 들어 있습니다. ⚾kusf 클럽챔피언십 2026 베이스볼5 챌린지 참가팀을 모집합니다. 일부 각룡류 종류는 무리 생활을 하였다는 증거가 발견되었기에 성체들이 새끼를 둘러싸고 둥근 원 형태의 방어진을 쳐 육식공룡과 싸우는 형태의 그림이 그려졌다. 고대 로마의 왕조 시대 이야기는 역사와 전설을 혼합하고 있는데, 타르퀴니우스는 로마의 제5대 왕 루키우스 타르퀴니우스 프리스쿠스 lucius tarquinius priscus의 아들이거나 손자로, 아내와 형 모두를 살인하며 왕위를 획득한 데 이어 전임자인 세르비우스 툴리우스를 암살한 것으로 전해진다. 1989년 이래, ＜ 비쿠트리녹쿠스 ＞는 스위스의 시계 만들기의 제일선에 계속 서 왔습니다. cametan okinawa

ca-201 한국 고대왕자 공룡킹 에 나오는 고다이 류타 의 파트너. 톰포드 아티쿠스 슈퍼 프레인 피크 lapel 울 수트. 1869년 남아메리카에서 처음 발견되었으며 이때는 단편적인 화석만이 발견되었기 때문에 정확한 생김새를 추측할 수 없었다. Com › vnvns45 › 223878880920수의사가 선택한 반려견 영양제 슈퍼벳 아가리쿠스 솔직후기 네이버. 슈퍼 구조물 모드 설치된 상태에서 안드류사르쿠스 어떻게 길들여.

cd lua 디시 연관 시라쿠스시라쿠스메이플크리스마스그릇커튼이불소파수납장식탁행거러그수건전신 거울스탠드 조명선반. 중고 4,445,880원 세금 포함 신상품 및 재입고 재고 수량 1개. 스위스의 데레몬에 있는 watch competence center에서 제조. 연타킥 浴びせて武者震い 아비세테 무샤부루이 흥분과 떨림을 퍼부어라 スゲエ物語 ことが 待ってるんだぜ 스게에 코토가. Com › bugman1303 › 220615153857슈퍼 악어, 사르코수쿠스 네이버 블로그.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.