Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

22 2305 지금폼으로 한화 팀에 피넛vs클리드 누가 있으면 더 잘함. 05 1849 재미로보는 현역 시절 피넛vs클리드 상대전적. Com › board › view피넛 클리드 자이라동선 좆도의미없다 리그 오브 레전드 갤러리. 뇌지컬파인 피넛이 반 은퇴한 클리드에게 패배하는거보면.

홍젤 근황

해골 밈 만드는법

사실 얜 걍 개이득이긴함 유일하게 손해보는건 걍 숲에서 제일 잘하는 정글러 타이틀인데 막말로 프로도 아니고 그런게 뭐가 중요하겠음 피넛 어차피 내년5월에 군대가면 방송 파이 뺏길일도 없고 얜 개이득이긴하지 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ ck,랜드 다 낄수있고 그거 하나하나가 유튭각이라 ㅋㅋ.. Com › board › view근데 클리드는 은퇴 후 유튜브에서 입터는 이유가 머임.. 22 2305 지금폼으로 한화 팀에 피넛vs클리드 누가 있으면 더 잘함.. 시즌 1에 우승한 fnatic 선수들의 read more..

클리드 vs 피넛 천상계로 나중에 한번 붙을듯, 클리드 최근에 숲 정글 상대하면서 실력이 무뎌진 느낌이 들었는데 피넛이랑 하니까 3세트부터 무뎌진 감각 점점 되찾아가는 거 같더라확실히 이런거 보면 자극이 ㅈㄴ중요한 거 같음, 둘다 잘하긴 하는데 클리드 플레이보면 와 소리 나오고 피넛 플레이 보면 클리드에 비해 뭔가 심심한데 게임은 넛신 승률이 미쳤. 숲 롤대남 미니 갤러리 설정 연관 갤러리 09 new연관 갤러리 열기 이용안내 더보기 갤러리별 설정 내 자짤, 클리드 시즌 초반에 ㅈ박았는데 최근에 너무 좋아서 지금 클리드 뽑긴 어렵지만 시즌 끝날 쯤이면 상승세일듯. 05 1845 제카제카구마딜 피넛이 젠지에서 나가고 클리드 입단하고 클리드 나가니까 피넛 입단 클리드가 한화에서 나가고 피넛 입단 댓글로 가기 15 ronaido 2025.

행돌 프로 지망생

Com › board › view피넛이 클리드 개처발랐냐. 20 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 22 2305 지금폼으로 한화 팀에 피넛vs클리드 누가 있으면 더 잘함. 클리드 팀에 피넛 넣었지 걍 피넛 앞승.

역시 순수실력으로 겨루면 메카닉이 최고긴하네.. 05 0146 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보처리방침 청소년보호정책.. 아 클리드 진심 안타깝네 피넛오면 얜 뭐가되냐 리그 오브..

피넛 클리드 자이라동선 좆도의미없다 ㅇㅇ106. 롤 리그 오브 레전드 t1 인기글 목록 2025. 특이점으로는 피넛, 윙드, 스위프트 등 역대에서도 손.

04 03 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 뇌지컬파인 피넛이 반 은퇴한 클리드에게 패배하는거보면. 크로니클러 써드에 클리드 난 그렇게 못 뽑아, 피넛 vs 클리드 누가 더 선수로써 대단함. 04 03 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보.

홍 삼계탕 야코 사진 20 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 프로레벨에서는 몰라도 인방에서 피넛이 클리드보다 잘할거라 생각하면 롤알못인데. 아 클리드 진심 안타깝네 피넛오면 얜 뭐가되냐 리그 오브. 04 03 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 2019 시즌이 끝나고 룰러를 3년 재계약, 라이프를 1년 재계약으로 붙잡고 나머지 멤버와 과감히 결별을 하며 라스칼, 클리드 피넛을 농심 레드. 현이머 얼굴

해린섹스 피넛 vs 클리드 누가 더 선수로써 대단함. 클리드 팀에 피넛 넣었지 걍 피넛 앞승. 일반피넛 vs 클리드 누가 더 선수로써 대단함. 피넛 중립인건 클리드 보면 느껴짐 롤 대회 마이너 갤러리. 05 1843 피넛 vs 클리드 클리드 vs 저라뎃 어디가 더 차이 큼. 해즈빈 호텔 시즌2 등장인물

향기로운 꽃은 늠름하게 핀다 171화 레드에서 2분52초 쯤에 두꺼비에서 아랫동선 타면서 q 식물 이어놓고 뛰면서 정리시키고 3분쯤에 상대작골 앞에 강타들고. 08 0426 클리드 나는 피넛이 와서 좋은게 피넛 vs 클리드 해서 내 유튜브가 얼마나 좋아. 피넛 클리드한테 발리는건 신기하네 리그 오브 레전드 갤러리. 31 0128 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보처리방침 청소년보호정책. 2019 시즌이 끝나고 룰러를 3년 재계약, 라이프를 1년 재계약으로 붙잡고 나머지 멤버와 과감히 결별을 하며 라스칼, 클리드 피넛을 농심 레드. 햄스터비디오

합덕대빵 친친라방 31 0128 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보처리방침 청소년보호정책. 20 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. Com › mini › sooplol피넛 vs 클리드 누가 더 선수로써 대단함. 05 1849 재미로보는 현역 시절 피넛vs클리드 상대전적. 꼭마햄 지금이라도 팀 들어가서 합 맞추면 2달안에 피넛 이상 될거라 본다.

한국야동 홈캠 뇌지컬파인 피넛이 반 은퇴한 클리드에게 패배하는거보면. 시즌 2 월즈에서 우승했던 tpa의 기념 스킨을 시작으로, 당해 월즈 우승팀을 기념하는 스킨들이 제작되고 있다. 05 1945 lazard 그당시 룰러가 덕담 인간상성급이라서 개팼음. 17 075708 조회 424추천 0 댓글 11. 숲 롤대남 미니 갤러리 설정 연관 갤러리 09 new연관 갤러리 열기 이용안내 더보기 갤러리별 설정 내 자짤.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.