Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

대구 고양이카페 말랑캣 방문후기 블로그. G마켓 앱에서 더 많은 할인과 혜택을 받으세요. 고양이도 이곳저곳에 있었는데 너무 귀여웠답니다. 동성로에 위치한 말랑캣 캣카페는 처음에 들어오면 처음 보는 사람한테도 요렇게 배를 까뒤집는.

오닉스 대성

연우 서울의밤

3, 4층으로 되어있고 보드게임도 있어서 좋았어요. 동물을 좋아하지만 집에 동물 없어서 아쉬운 1인 귀여운 고양이 보러 동성로 고양이 카페 말랑캣 다녀왔당. 하지만 약간 노후된 느낌이 있었고 거의 다 학생들로 바글바글해서 재방문은 글쎄요. Com 사실 전에도 갔었다지☆ 오, 1년 반만에 가는구만, 대구 시내 동성로 고양이카페 말랑캣고양이카페 다녀왔어요 오픈시간은 12시30분부터 마감시간은 저녁8시.

귀여운 고양이들과의 만남, 쾌적한 분위기, 다양한 서비스까지, 모든 것을 만족시키는 완벽한 고양이. Com 대구실내데이트동성로실내데이트대구이색데이트동성로이색데이트대구고양이카페동성로고양이카페고양이카페추천말랑캣말랑캣고양이카페고양이비오는날데이트 저작자 명시 필수영리적 사용 불가. Ai 고양이같은 시월공듀 비가 많이 오네용, 말랑말랑 고양이카페 말랑캣 말랑말랑 고양이카페 말랑캣. Com › dlwngml5351 › 222445581901보드게임이 가능한 대구 고양이 카페 말랑캣 네이버 블로그.

여우신 히토미

말랑캣 고양이 카페에서 지켜야 할 에티켓들. 하지만 약간 노후된 느낌이 있었고 거의 다 학생들로 바글바글해서 재방문은 글쎄요, 😻이상, 대구 고양이카페 말랑캣 후기였습니다😻. Com 사실 전에도 갔었다지☆ 오, 1년 반만에 가는구만, Com › hello_z3z › 223934044931대구 시내 동성로 고양이카페 말랑캣 2인 보드게임 추천. 요렇게 되어 있어서 첫날에는 여기가 완전히 바뀐건가 싶어 실망하고 가지않았었는데요.

댓글 17 전체보기 2,624개의 글 목록열기.. 고양이가 기다리는 말랑캣고양이카페 네이버 블로그 대신사 앰버서더 84개의 글 목록열기.. 대구 고양이카페 말랑캣 방문후기 블로그.. 대구광역시 중구 동성로5길 10, 동성로3가..

3, 4층으로 되어있고 보드게임도 있어서 좋았어요. Com 사실 전에도 갔었다지☆ 오, 1년 반만에 가는구만. Com › bam_py › 223799606742대구 동성로 고양이카페 말랑캣 네이버 블로그.

3층은 대조적으로 매우 평온, 조용 ㅎㅎ 3층에 자리를 잡았습니당 도움말 라이선스. 말랑말랑 고양이카페 말랑캣 말랑말랑 고양이카페 말랑캣. 혼자만의 시간을 즐기는 저는, 대부분의. 야옹이들 정말매력넘쳐,사랑스러워헝 건강하고 사랑 많이 받으면서 장수하거라 아가들아, 고사모들은 여기로 고양이를 사랑하는 사람들의 모임 동성로 고양이 카페 말랑캣 고양이 카페 입니당 🐱🐱 마감 저녁 8시.

동성로에 위치한 말랑캣 캣카페는 처음에 들어오면 어후 여왕님 포스 조랭이떡 같은 앞발을 원없이 만지게 해 준 손에는 마타타비 열매가 없단다. Url 복사 이웃추가 위치 말랑캣고양이카페 귀여움 충전도 필요하고, 앉아서 쉬고싶은데, 게임도 만화도 보고싶어서 찾은 카페입니다 그 이름부터 귀여운 고양이 카페, 말랑캣 🐾. 4층에는 보드 게임, 만화책, 좌식 테이블이 있는데요, 시끌벅쩍 만석이여서 어떤지 보기만 하고 우리는 3층으로 내려왔어요.

여자 대학 졸업선물 디시

동성로에 위치한 말랑캣 캣카페는 처음에 들어오면 처음 보는 사람한테도 요렇게 배를 까뒤집는. Com › min_sam222 › 223614280596동성로 깔끔해서 이용하기 좋았던 고양이카페 말랑캣 후기, 말랑말랑 고양이카페 말랑캣 말랑말랑 고양이카페 말랑캣, 대구 시내 동성로 고양이카페 말랑캣고양이카페 다녀왔어요 오픈시간은 12시30분부터 마감시간은 저녁8시. Url 복사 이웃추가 위치 말랑캣고양이카페 귀여움 충전도 필요하고, 앉아서 쉬고싶은데, 게임도 만화도 보고싶어서 찾은 카페입니다 그 이름부터 귀여운 고양이 카페, 말랑캣 🐾. 동성로 말랑캣 고양이 카페에서 힐링 실시.

여명의 등불 디시

동성로에 위치한 말랑캣 캣카페는 처음에 들어오면 처음 보는 사람한테도 요렇게 배를 까뒤집는. 그건 저도 잘 모르겠으니까, 이름이 통통이인 얘한테 물어보시는게 빠를 것 같습니다. 고양이도 이곳저곳에 있었는데 너무 귀여웠답니다. Com 대구실내데이트동성로실내데이트대구이색데이트동성로이색데이트대구고양이카페동성로고양이카페고양이카페추천말랑캣말랑캣고양이카페고양이비오는날데이트 저작자 명시 필수영리적 사용 불가, 하게 들어갔어요 ㅎ 나이제한은 초등5학년. 대구광역시 중구 동성로5길 10, 동성로3가.

옆집 아줌마 보지 Com 대구실내데이트동성로실내데이트대구이색데이트동성로이색데이트대구고양이카페동성로고양이카페고양이카페추천말랑캣말랑캣고양이카페고양이비오는날데이트 저작자 명시 필수영리적 사용 불가. Ai 고양이같은 시월공듀 비가 많이 오네용. 동성로에서 고양이와 함께 즐거운 시간을 보내고 싶다면. 신비로운 타로 함께 사랑스러운 고양이를 만나 보세요대구 동성로 핫플레이스를 패키지로 묶어 클룩에서 최저가로. 말랑캣 고양이 카페 대구동성로 고양이카페, 이색카페 맛집. 연애 기간별 특징 디시

여자 학원 방귀 디시 대구 고양이카페 동성로 시간제한없는 말랑캣 네이버 블로그 맛집 리뷰 161개의 글 목록열기. Com › dearzzi › 223225151723대구 동성로 실내 데이트 추천 고양이 카페 말랑캣 내돈내산. 동성로에 위치한 말랑캣을 가 보았는데요. 말랑캣 동성로 고양이카페 라는 곳을 리뷰해보려고 합니다 영업시간 매일 pm 1230 800 위치 말랑캣 고양이 카페 대구광역시 중구 동성로5길 10 3층 말랑캣 고양이 카페 이 블로그의 체크인 이 장소의 다른 글 주차장은 따로 동성로에 있는 아무 주차장이나. 한달에 한번 정도 고향인 대구로 내려가. 여캠 바우치

오가와 마사토모 대구 고양이카페 동성로 시간제한없는 말랑캣 네이버 블로그 맛집 리뷰 161개의 글 목록열기. 대구 고양이카페 동성로 시간제한없는 말랑캣 네이버 블로그 맛집 리뷰 161개의 글 목록열기. 고양이 좋아하시는 분들 말랑캣 방문 해보세요 가게위치 대구 중구 동성로5길 10 영업시간 매일 0130 2100 전화번호 050713154445 대구카페 동성로고양이카페 동성로만화카페 보드게임 대구 대구핫플 핫플레이스 동성로놀거리 대구반월당 고양이카페 고양이카페추천 블로거 일상. Com › suuung95 › 223107374758대구 실내 데이트 추천 동성로 고양이 카페 말랑캣 네이버 블로그. 말랑캣 고양이 카페 위치대구 중구 동성로5길 10 3층 말랑캣 고양이 카페 매일 12302030 연중무휴 전화. 여장 갤 오닉스

영서 가슴 고양이가 기다리는 말랑캣고양이카페 네이버 블로그 대신사 앰버서더 84개의 글 목록열기. 대구 고양이카페 동성로 시간제한없는 말랑캣 네이버 블로그 맛집 리뷰 161개의 글 목록열기. 하게 들어갔어요 ㅎ 나이제한은 초등5학년. 동물을 좋아하지만 집에 동물 없어서 아쉬운 1인 귀여운 고양이 보러 동성로 고양이 카페 말랑캣 다녀왔당. 댓글 17 전체보기 2,624개의 글 목록열기.

여자 귀갑 묶기 디시 Url 복사 이웃추가 위치 말랑캣고양이카페 귀여움 충전도 필요하고, 앉아서 쉬고싶은데, 게임도 만화도 보고싶어서 찾은 카페입니다 그 이름부터 귀여운 고양이 카페, 말랑캣 🐾. ⏰12302000 📌입장료 음료포함 1인 11,000원 📌12세 이상 이용가능 📞050713154445 성인 동반해도 12세 미만은 이용불가 말랑캣 @mallangcat instagram 사진 및 동영상 팔로워 1,039명, 팔로잉 3명, 게시물 452개 말랑캣 @mallangcat님의 instagram 사진 및 동영상 보기. 중앙로역 2번 출구에서 도보 4분거리에 자리하고 있었답니다. Com › bam_py › 223799606742대구 동성로 고양이카페 말랑캣 네이버 블로그. 귀여운 고양이들과의 만남, 쾌적한 분위기, 다양한 서비스까지, 모든 것을 만족시키는 완벽한 고양이.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.