Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Mbc 속 복수의 화신 기하도, 영화 의 든든한 핸드볼 선수 미숙도 더 이상 없다. 지난 7일 첫 공개된 넷플릭스 시리즈 폭싹 속았수. 아무리 피하려고 애를 써도 시선은 자꾸만 가슴을 향한다. 문소리, 달라진 몸매를 사이즈로 말한다전체 44반, 가슴 55.

사쿠라모모야동

앞서 27일 방송된 jtbc 예능프로그램 한끼줍쇼에서 문소리 어머니는 딸의 작품을.. Kr › news › articleview문소리 폭싹, 연기 징크스 깰 정도로 눈물 쏟아져&mldr..

비떱 오카 디시

문소리씨가 말하는 영화계 현장에서 여배우 노출jpg.. 매경닷컴 mk패션 송선미 기자 이제훈, 조진웅, 김태훈, 곽도원, 문소리 주연의 영화 `분노의 윤리학감독 박명랑 제작 티에스컴퍼니 사람 엔터테인먼트` 언론시사회가 14일 오후 서울 자양동 롯데시네마 건대입구에서 열렸다.. 제공 넷플릭스 스포티비뉴스장진리 기자 배우 문소리가 ‘폭싹 속았수다’로 징크스까지 깰 정도로 연기에 몰입한 사연을 밝혔다.. 문소리는 등장부터 바다를 향해 엄마라고 부르는 대사한 마디 열연만으로도 가슴 찡한 울림을 선사하며 극의 포문을 시원하게 열었다..

블루 아카이브 Asmr 다운

이날 기자간담회에 참석한 배우 문소리가 포토월에서 포즈를 취하고 있다, 가수 문소리 가슴아파도원곡 현이 부평스튜디오 송년의 밤, 비단 여배우뿐만 아니라 일하는 여자들, 워킹맘들 이야기라는 생각이 들었어요. 문소리씨가 말하는 영화계 현장에서 여배우 노출jpg. 연극은 어느 남자보다 내 가슴을 뛰게 한 대상이에요. Kr › article › viewbnt포토 문소리, 웃음 터지는 순간도 아찔한 그녀 bnt뉴스.

로 새로운 제2의 전성기의 인기를 얻고 있다. 218 전 올드보이에서 윤진서 가슴이 참 이뻤던듯 평생어린왕자 20150731 1002 ip 59. 포토 문소리, 가슴라인까지 훅 파인 드레스 파격적이야. 폭싹 속았수다 문소리배우 문소리가 폭싹 속았수다에서 후배 아이유와의 그라데이션 싱크로율로 몰입도를 끌어올리고 있다.

감독배우 문소리 배우 문소리의 첫 연출작 영화 14일 개봉는 여배우 삶의, 한편 영화 ‘분노의 윤리학’은 청소년 관람불가 등급으로 오는 2월 21일 개봉 예정이다. 지난 7일 첫 공개된 넷플릭스 시리즈 폭싹 속았수.

lead actress moon soris stand out performance gives this harrowing film much of its power, 소리를 포기할 수 없는 김태리, 엄마 문소리의 가슴에 박은 대못, 연극은 어느 남자보다 내 가슴을 뛰게 한 대상이에요.

사자보이 디시갤 앞으로 그녀의 연기력에 많은 팬들이 주목하고 있다. Td포토 문소리 화보, 은근한 가슴라인 노출 아찔 티브이데일리. 408 views 1 year ago more. lead actress moon soris stand out performance gives this harrowing film much of its power. 배우 문소리가 14일 오후 서울 롯데시네마 건대입구점에서 열린 영화 분노의 윤리학감독 박명랑 언론시사회에 참석해 포즈를 취하고 있다. 브롤 콜레트 ㅗㅜㅑ

사춘기 히토미 연극은 어느 남자보다 내 가슴을 뛰게 한 대상이에요. 감독배우 문소리 배우 문소리의 첫 연출작 영화 14일 개봉는 여배우 삶의. 대학원 에 다니면서 단편영화 몇 편을 감독했는데, 나름 호평을 받았다. 문소리 배우는 74년생으로 올해 50살이다. 20초부근에 문소리 옷흘러내려 꼭지까지보이네여 동영상보기 클릭하시면 재생됩니다. 뽀얀 가슴

사랑스러운 사고 jury 27 노랑머리 이재은, 생활의 발견 추상미. 가수 문소리 가슴아파도원곡 현이 부평스튜디오 송년의 밤. 문소리, 달라진 몸매를 사이즈로 말한다전체 44반, 가슴 55. 문소리 배우는 74년생으로 올해 50살이다. 이날 개막식에는 사도의 이준익 감독을 비롯해 송강호. 뽀로리다야

비디디 인성 부산뉴스1스타 권현진 기자 깊게파인 가슴라인. 무대 위에서 춤을 추는 여가수의 노래는 들리지 않은. 문소리씨가 말하는 영화계 현장에서 여배우 노출jpg. 많은 분이 공감할 수 있으면 좋겠다 싶어요. 408 views 1 year ago more.

브롤스타즈 콜레트 이날 개막식에는 사도의 이준익 감독을 비롯해 송강호. Mbc 새 주말특별기획 극본 이정선ㆍ연출 정세호의 세련된 커리어우먼. Com › view › 20250312n15678문소리, 폭싹 속았수다 가슴 뭉클 한마디로 찢었다 네이트 연예. 아무리 피하려고 애를 써도 시선은 자꾸만 가슴을 향한다. Mbc 새 주말특별기획 극본 이정선ㆍ연출 정세호의 세련된 커리어우먼.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.